Collaborative research partnerships with disadvantaged communities: challenges and potential solutions

Public Health ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (9) ◽  
pp. 758-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. El Ansari
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zanib Rasool

Collaborative research can bring communities to the heart of social research and provide a lens on the everyday experiences of ordinary people living extraordinary lives, capturing the funds of knowledge held in communities that exist outside the corridors of education institutions. If delivered in an ethical way, co-production can empower communities and elevate voices that traditionally have been on the margins. Through collaboration, we can bridge the knowledge gap that exists between communities and universities and raise community aspirations.


Author(s):  
Walid El Ansari

Notions of the “expert patient,” user choices about where care is provided and by whom, and enhanced understanding between patients and healthcare workers for continuity of care all have implications for workforce planning and human resources. Modern health systems and care require a range of patient and community inputs if they are to be relevant for their users. However, partnering with disadvantaged communities for such purposes is not an easy undertaking. Such partnership efforts need to be premised on a participatory approach and face multiple challenges. Given the range of the stakeholders involved, the sharing of turf, risks, and resources that are usually part of such efforts requires careful consideration of all the partners. Further, there is always the possible exhaustion of the communities from being repeatedly over-researched, as well as the frequently encountered initial lack of trust between partners-to-be who have not previously collaborated. In such circumstances, the sharing of assets and a focus on enhancing the mutual capacities for a common purpose needs to be spelled out clearly from the start. Notwithstanding these and other challenges, over the past decade partnerships have become a frequent requirement for government and funding agency assistance. Research partnerships that incorporate community assets and values are among the defining approaches to social problem solving, where partnering has become the fundamental and strategic component of efforts aimed at promoting community health.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Dobbs ◽  
Christy L. Davies ◽  
Michelle L. Walker ◽  
Neil E. Pettit ◽  
Bradley J. Pusey ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-256
Author(s):  
Nathan Eisenstadt ◽  
Josie McLellan

Emerging scholarship on university–community co-production rightly emphasizes the importance of preparatory work to build research partnerships. Such preparation creates the necessary common ground on which to build a meaningful collaborative relationship. Drawing on our experiences on a large university–community co-production experiment in historical mapping, we argue that this work is particularly important in partnerships where relationships are characterized by difference. If academics wish to work with individuals and groups beyond the bounds of those with whom they already agree, ‘foregrounding’ co-production is a critical component. We identify three dimensions of foregrounding co-production: practical, epistemological and affective. Each become increasingly important in cases where communities lack trust in, or actively mistrust, the university. Understanding and navigating difference, historical harm and power asymmetries can be time-intensive, and it may require a reorientation of the relationship between process and output in collaborative projects such that initially intended aims are not met. In order to encourage co-production across difference, we conclude that foregrounding should be valued as an end or ‘output’ in and of itself.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Credo ◽  
Jani C. Ingram

In the United States, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people are frequently under- or misrepresented in research and health statistics. A principal reason for this disparity is the lack of collaborative partnerships between researchers and tribes. There are hesitations from both academic Western scientists and tribal communities to establish new partnerships due to differences in cultural and scientific understanding, from data ownership and privacy to dissemination and project expansion. An infamous example is the mishandling of samples collected from the Havasupai Tribe by Arizona State University (ASU) scientists, leading to a legal battle between the tribe and ASU and ending in a moratorium of research with the Havasupai people. This paper will explore three successful and positive collaborations with a large and small tribe, including how the partnerships were established and the outcomes of the collaboration. In addition, the paper will provide perspective of what needs to be addressed by Western scientists if productive collaborations with tribal groups are to be established.


2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 837-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy J. Reback ◽  
Allan J. Cohen ◽  
Thomas E. Freese ◽  
Steven Shoptaw

Drawing on our experiences as researchers and community-based providers, this paper outlines several key components of successful practice/research collaboration: forming equal partnerships, bilateral communication, ensuring nonhierarchical collaborations, and appropriate dissemination of outcomes. Many concrete benefits can result from collaborative research projects, including additional services, program development, and training for service agency staff. Building partnerships takes time and a good amount of planning and negotiation prior to writing proposals. However, these collaborations can result in more effective efforts to solve common problems and reach common goals.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Carolyn Behrman ◽  
Karen Flynn ◽  
Arleen Hanlin

Anthropologists have been engaging in active or participatory research agendas to an increasing degree in recent years, a trend that is well documented in Practicing Anthropology and a wide variety of venues ranging from Human Organization to Anthropology and Education Quarterly to PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. These research agendas involve partnerships between academic researchers and community-based groups. The partners work together to design and implement studies addressing specific concerns of the wider community in which the partner and, generally, the academics' institution are embedded. At their best community-based, collaborative research partnerships result in strong, well-targeted studies that directly contribute to the effectiveness or success of some local program or service. More broadly these partnerships also contribute to the well-being of the community in many ways, including enhanced ‘town-gown’ relationships.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document