Landscape transformations of early rice agriculture: methodological developments and new results in the archaeological identification of arable rice systems in prehistory

2012 ◽  
Vol 279-280 ◽  
pp. 530-531
Author(s):  
Alison Weisskopf
The Holocene ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 743-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorian Q Fuller ◽  
Jacob van Etten ◽  
Katie Manning ◽  
Cristina Castillo ◽  
Eleanor Kingwell-Banham ◽  
...  

We review the origins and dispersal of rice in Asia based on a data base of 443 archaeobotanical reports. Evidence is considered in terms of quality, and especially whether there are data indicating the mode of cultivation, in flooded (‘paddy’ or ‘wet’) or non-flooded (‘dry’) fields. At present it appears that early rice cultivation in the Yangtze region and southern China was based on wet, paddy-field systems from early on, before 4000 bc, whereas early rice in northern India and Thailand was predominantly dry rice at 2000 bc, with a transition to flooded rice documented for India at c. 1000 bc. On the basis of these data we have developed a GIS spatial model of the spread of rice and the growth of land area under paddy rice. This is then compared with a review of the spread of ungulate livestock (cattle, water buffalo, sheep, goat) throughout the Old World. After the initial dispersal through Europe and around the Mediterranean (7000–4000 bc), the major period of livestock expansion is after 3000 bc, into the Sub-Saharan savannas, through monsoonal India and into central China. Further expansion, to southern Africa and Southeast Asia dates mostly after 1000 bc. Based on these two data sets we provide a quantitative model of the land area under irrigated rice, and its likely methane output, through the mid to late Holocene, for comparison to a more preliminary estimate of the expansion of methane-producing livestock. Both data sets are congruent with an anthropogenic source of later Holocene methane after 3000 bc, although it may be that increase in methane input from livestock was most significant in the 3000–1000 bc period, whereas rice paddies become an increasingly significant source especially after 2000 bc.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Aoi Hosoya ◽  
Yo-Ichiro Sato ◽  
Dorian Q. Fuller
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Manjil Hazarika

Northeast India is situated at the nexus of the South Asian, Southeast Asian, and East Asian biogeographical realms and harbours diverse biota, providing a unique opportunity to archaeologists and anthropologists for the study of the relationship between humans and their environment over the ages. Moreover, this region, the abode of diverse ethnic groups with diverse cultures and customs, hints at a long history of continuous and close association between humans and nature, which is important in the understanding of plant and animal domestication. Genetic analysis of present-day domesticates with their wild counterparts provides valuable insights into their differentiation, time of domestication, and changes in their morphological traits through control by humans. The chapter also elucidates the role played by rice in Northeast Indian culture and highlights the long-term history of rice agriculture in the region.


Planta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 254 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mafroz A. Basunia ◽  
Heather M. Nonhebel ◽  
David Backhouse ◽  
Mary McMillan
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Nelson

Rice was first introduced from China 1122 B.C., but millet had already been grown there for many centuries.” When Hulbert (1906:15) wrote these words in the early years of this century, he presumably followed some written or oral tradition regarding Kija's (Chi-tzu), the legendary agnate of the last Shang king, bringing rice to Korea. It is interesting that there was a tradition that millet cultivation preceded rice, which came from northern China at approximately 1100 B.C. Seventy-five years after Hulbert recorded the tradition in English, archaeological research has demonstrated that millet did precede rice in Korea, and that the timing of the introduction of rice at the end of the Shang dynasty is probably too late rather than too early.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document