Abstract
Two commonly used population structure software packages are freely available for breed authentication, Structure and Admixture. Structure uses a Bayesian approach to model population structure, while Admixture uses a frequentist approach. More recently, an allele frequency method has been updated to use quadratic programming to constrain the multiple linear regression coefficients of the regression of genotype count (divided by two) on the matrix of allele frequencies for each known breed or line. This constraint forced coefficients to sum to one and be greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 1. The goal of this research was to compare and contrast these three methods to determine the breed/line authenticity for each of the five genetic lines. These five lines included Large White, Landrace, a lean Duroc, a meat quality Duroc, and a Pietrain line. Only animals with a 50K SNP panel were used in this analysis. Analyses were run five times for Structure and Admixture to check repeatability. The allele frequency method did not need to be repeated because it remains the same as long as the reference allele frequency matrix stays constant. For Structure, results of breed composition were inconsistent across replicates. Structure separated at least one of the maternal lines in three out of the five replicates with only 500 animals and kept the Duroc lines together as one population. Only 500 animals could be utilized in each run of Structure due to computational restraints. Admixture was very consistent across runs for each animal, but also failed to separate the two Duroc lines, instead splitting one of the two maternal lines. Finally, the allele frequency method split all five lines correctly and was 100% reproducible as long as the reference allele frequency matrix stays the same across runs.
Correction to: Benchmarking the software packages to model and assess the seismic response of unreinforced masonry existing buildings through nonlinear static analyses
