scholarly journals Gay fathers through cross-border surrogacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for mental health and father–child bonding

Author(s):  
Nicola Carone ◽  
Demetria Manzi ◽  
Lavinia Barone ◽  
Vittorio Lingiardi ◽  
Roberto Baiocco ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranit Mishori ◽  
Kathryn Hampton ◽  
Hajar Habbach ◽  
Elsa Raker ◽  
Anjali Niyogi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Asylum evaluations are highly specialized medico-legal encounters which collect physical or mental health evidence, or both, and used in immigration proceedings. Although the field of asylum medicine is growing, access to these evaluations is still inadequate, particularly for asylum seekers in immigration detention or other forms of custody, such as under the Migrant Protection Protocols or “Remain in Mexico” policy. Given advances in telemedicine in recent years and growing evidence of similar outcomes with in-person treatment, it seems prudent to examine whether remote modalities may also be effective for conducting mental health asylum evaluations in hard-to-reach populations. Methods: We analyzed the comments of 12 clinicians who conducted a total of 25 cross-border remote mental health evaluations and completed a post-evaluation survey regarding their impressions and experiences. Results: Clinicians encountered a number of challenges including technical difficulties and a decreased ability to establish rapport. Nearly uniformly, however, clinicians noted that despite difficulties, they were able achieve the goals of the evaluation, including rapport building and diagnosis. Conclusion: remote evaluations appear to be non-inferior to in-person encounters and may be useful in expanding legal options for hard-to-reach asylum seekers.


2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ross ◽  
Phil Woods ◽  
Val Reed ◽  
Susan Sookoo ◽  
Anne Dean ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. A. Ioannidis

AbstractNeurobiology-based interventions for mental diseases and searches for useful biomarkers of treatment response have largely failed. Clinical trials should assess interventions related to environmental and social stressors, with long-term follow-up; social rather than biological endpoints; personalized outcomes; and suitable cluster, adaptive, and n-of-1 designs. Labor, education, financial, and other social/political decisions should be evaluated for their impacts on mental disease.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document