scholarly journals Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Villepinte ◽  
Arpana Verma ◽  
Chloe Dimeglio ◽  
Xavier De Boissezon ◽  
David Gasq
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Measures

Mirror therapy simultaneously combined with electrical stimulation for upper limb motor function recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552095193
Author(s):  
Alberto Saavedra-García ◽  
Jose A Moral-Munoz ◽  
David Lucena-Anton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Mirror Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of simultaneous combination of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation in the recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke, compared with conventional therapy, mirror therapy or electrical stimulation isolated. Data sources: Articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Central register of controlled trials and ScienceDirect up to July 2020. Review methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro tool. The RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used to obtain the meta-analysis, through the standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and to evaluate the risk of bias. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Eight articles were included in this systematic review, seven were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 314 participants were analyzed. The overall quality of the articles included in this review was good. There was no overall significant mean difference on upper limb motor function after stroke using the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment by 1.56 (95% CI = –2.08, 5.20; P = 0.40; moderate-certainty evidence) and the Box and Block Test results by 1.39 (95% CI = –2.14, 4.92; P = 0.44; high-certainty evidence). There was overall significant difference in the Action Research Arm Test by 3.54 (95% CI = 0.18, 6.90; P = 0.04; high-certainty evidence). Conclusion: Direct scientific evidence about the effectiveness of the combined therapy of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation simultaneously for the improvement of the upper limb motor function after stroke is lacking. Further high-quality and well-designed research is needed.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Massage Therapy for Improving Sequelae in Post-Stroke Survivors. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4424
Author(s):  
Rosa Cabanas-Valdés ◽  
Jordi Calvo-Sanz ◽  
Pol Serra-Llobet ◽  
Joana Alcoba-Kait ◽  
Vanessa González-Rueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Therapeutic Massage ◽  
Limb Spasticity ◽  
Conventional Physiotherapy

Objective: To assess the effect of therapeutic massage for improving sequelae in stroke survivors. Methods: A systematic review of the nine medical databases from January 1961 to December 2020 was carried out. The bibliography was screened to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently screened references, selected relevant studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the PEDro scale. The primary outcome was upper and lower limb motor function and spasticity. Results: A total of 3196 studies were identified and 18 RCT were finally included (1989 individuals). A meta-analysis of RCTs in the comparison of Chinese massage (Tuina) plus conventional physiotherapy versus conventional physiotherapy was performed. The mean difference (MD) in the subacute stage on upper limb motor-function using the Fugl Meyer Assessment was 2.75; (95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.97 to 4.53, p = 0.002, I2 = 36%). The MD on upper limb spasticity using modified Ashworth scale was −0.15; (95% CI from −0.24 to −0.06, p < 0.02, I2 = 0%).The MD on lower limb spasticity was −0.59; (95% CI from −0.78 to −0.40, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) in the endpoint. Conclusions: Therapeutic massage, especially Tuina, in addition to conventional therapy is effective for improving motor function and for reducing spasticity in stroke survivors.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of technological interventions to improve upper limb motor function in people with stroke in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiling Milagros Carbajal-Galarza ◽  
Nathaly Olga Chinchihualpa-Paredes ◽  
Sergio Alejandro Abanto-Perez ◽  
María Lazo-Porras
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Technological Interventions ◽  
Low And Middle Income

ABSTRACTIntroductionStroke is one of the main causes of disability in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), frequently presenting with upper extremity paresis and causing major functional dependence. It requires high dose and intense rehabilitation which implies high economic costs, consequently limiting this therapy in LMIC. There are multiple technological interventions that facilitate rehabilitation either in intensity, adherence and motor evaluation; or enable access to rehabilitation such as robots, games or virtual reality, sensors, electronic devices and tele-rehabilitation. Their efficacy has been mainly evaluated in high-income countries, hence the importance of conducting a systematic review in LMIC settings.ObjectivesTo measure the efficacy of technological interventions vs. classical physical rehabilitation in the upper extremity motor function in people who had suffered a first or recurrent episode of stroke in LMIC.Methods and analysisThis protocol is consistent with the methodology recommended by the PRISMA-P and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. We propose to do a systematic review and meta-analysis. In order to do so, we will perform an electronic search in PubMed, Global Index Medicus and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. No date range parameters will be used. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in English, Spanish, French and Portuguese, with the primary outcome focusing on upper limb motor function, will be included. Two reviewers will screen all retrieved titles, abstracts and full texts, perform the evaluation of the risk of bias and extract all data independently. The risk of bias of the included RCT will be evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. A qualitative synthesis will be provided in text and tables, to summarize the main results of the selected publications.The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed through the I2 statistic. If there is sufficient homogeneity across outcomes, a meta-analysis will be considered. The outcomes to be evaluated will be motor functionality of the upper extremity, performance for activities of daily living and quality of life, through measurement scales.ConclusionsThis systematic review will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of multiple technological interventions to improve motor function of upper extremity in individuals with stroke in LMIC. Based on this analysis, we will be able to assess whether these interventions are also effective and feasible in the recovery of functionality after stroke in low- and middle-income countries, and thus offer recommendations in these areas.

scholarly journals Virtual Reality Systems for Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amaranta De Miguel-Rubio ◽  
M Dolores Rubio ◽  
Alvaro Alba-Rueda ◽  
Alejandro Salazar ◽  
Jose A Moral-Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cord Injury

BACKGROUND Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) usually present with different motor impairments, including a deterioration of upper limb motor function (ULMF), that limit their performance of activities of daily living and reduce their quality of life. Virtual reality (VR) is being used in neurological rehabilitation for the assessment and treatment of the physical impairments of this condition. OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of VR on ULMF in patients with SCI compared with conventional physical therapy. METHODS The search was performed from October to December 2019 in Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The inclusion criteria of selected studies were as follows: (1) comprised adults with SCI, (2) included an intervention with VR, (3) compared VR intervention with conventional physical therapy, (4) reported outcomes related to ULMF, and (5) was a controlled clinical trial. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The RevMan 5.3 statistical software was used to obtain the meta-analysis according to the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs. RESULTS Six articles were included in this systematic review. Four of them contributed information to the meta-analysis. A total of 105 subjects were analyzed. All of the studies used semi-immersive or nonimmersive VR systems. The statistical analysis showed nonsignificant results for the Nine-Hole Peg Test (SMD –0.93, 95% CI –1.95 to 0.09), muscle balance test (SMD –0.27, 95% CI –0.82 to 0.27), Motricity Index (SMD 0.16, 95% CI −0.37 to 0.68), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) subtests (writing, SMD –0.10, 95% CI –4.01 to 3.82; simulated page turning, SMD –0.99, 95% CI –2.01 to 0.02; simulated feeding, SMD –0.64, 95% CI –1.61 to 0.32; stacking checkers, SMD 0.99, 95% CI –0.02 to 2.00; picking up large light objects, SMD –0.42, 95% CI –1.37 to 0.54; and picking up large heavy objects, SMD 0.52, 95% CI –0.44 to 1.49), range of motion of shoulder abduction/adduction (SMD –0.23, 95% CI –1.48 to 1.03), shoulder flexion/extension (SMD 0.56, 95% CI –1.24 to 2.36), elbow flexion (SMD –0.36, 95% CI –1.14 to 0.42), elbow extension (SMD –0.21, 95% CI –0.99 to 0.57), wrist extension (SMD 1.44, 95% CI –2.19 to 5.06), and elbow supination (SMD –0.18, 95% CI –1.80 to 1.44). Favorable results were found for the JTHFT subtest picking up small common objects (SMD –1.33, 95% CI –2.42 to –0.24). CONCLUSIONS The current evidence for VR interventions to improve ULMF in patients with SCI is limited. Future studies employing immersive systems to identify the key aspects that increase the clinical impact of VR interventions are needed, as well as research to prove the benefits of the use of VR in the rehabilitation of patients with SCI in the clinical setting.

scholarly journals Game-Based Virtual Reality Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function and Quality of Life After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Domínguez-Téllez ◽  
Jose A. Moral-Muñoz ◽  
Alejandro Salazar ◽  
Esteban Casado-Fernández ◽  
David Lucena-Antón
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Virtual Reality Systems for Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

10.2196/22537 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e22537
Author(s):  
Amaranta De Miguel-Rubio ◽  
M Dolores Rubio ◽  
Alvaro Alba-Rueda ◽  
Alejandro Salazar ◽  
Jose A Moral-Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cord Injury

Background Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) usually present with different motor impairments, including a deterioration of upper limb motor function (ULMF), that limit their performance of activities of daily living and reduce their quality of life. Virtual reality (VR) is being used in neurological rehabilitation for the assessment and treatment of the physical impairments of this condition. Objective A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of VR on ULMF in patients with SCI compared with conventional physical therapy. Methods The search was performed from October to December 2019 in Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The inclusion criteria of selected studies were as follows: (1) comprised adults with SCI, (2) included an intervention with VR, (3) compared VR intervention with conventional physical therapy, (4) reported outcomes related to ULMF, and (5) was a controlled clinical trial. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The RevMan 5.3 statistical software was used to obtain the meta-analysis according to the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs. Results Six articles were included in this systematic review. Four of them contributed information to the meta-analysis. A total of 105 subjects were analyzed. All of the studies used semi-immersive or nonimmersive VR systems. The statistical analysis showed nonsignificant results for the Nine-Hole Peg Test (SMD –0.93, 95% CI –1.95 to 0.09), muscle balance test (SMD –0.27, 95% CI –0.82 to 0.27), Motricity Index (SMD 0.16, 95% CI −0.37 to 0.68), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) subtests (writing, SMD –0.10, 95% CI –4.01 to 3.82; simulated page turning, SMD –0.99, 95% CI –2.01 to 0.02; simulated feeding, SMD –0.64, 95% CI –1.61 to 0.32; stacking checkers, SMD 0.99, 95% CI –0.02 to 2.00; picking up large light objects, SMD –0.42, 95% CI –1.37 to 0.54; and picking up large heavy objects, SMD 0.52, 95% CI –0.44 to 1.49), range of motion of shoulder abduction/adduction (SMD –0.23, 95% CI –1.48 to 1.03), shoulder flexion/extension (SMD 0.56, 95% CI –1.24 to 2.36), elbow flexion (SMD –0.36, 95% CI –1.14 to 0.42), elbow extension (SMD –0.21, 95% CI –0.99 to 0.57), wrist extension (SMD 1.44, 95% CI –2.19 to 5.06), and elbow supination (SMD –0.18, 95% CI –1.80 to 1.44). Favorable results were found for the JTHFT subtest picking up small common objects (SMD –1.33, 95% CI –2.42 to –0.24). Conclusions The current evidence for VR interventions to improve ULMF in patients with SCI is limited. Future studies employing immersive systems to identify the key aspects that increase the clinical impact of VR interventions are needed, as well as research to prove the benefits of the use of VR in the rehabilitation of patients with SCI in the clinical setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document