Implementation of a bundle of Utstein cardiopulmonary resuscitation programs to improve survival outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a metropolis: A before and after study

Resuscitation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Park ◽  
Sang Do Shin ◽  
Young Sun Ro ◽  
Kyoung Jun Song ◽  
Ki Jeong Hong ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C Moore ◽  
Michael Grahl ◽  
Tracy Marko ◽  
Ariel Blythe-Reske ◽  
Amber Lage ◽  
...  

Introduction: Active Compression Decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an impedance threshold device (ACD+ITD CPR) is available for use in the United States. However, little is known regarding integration of this CPR system into a large urban prehospital system with short response times, routine use of mechanical CPR and ITD, and transport of patients to cardiac arrest centers. This is an ongoing before and after study of the implementation of ACD+ITD CPR in non-traumatic cardiac arrest cases 6 months pre and post protocol change. Hypothesis: Neurologically intact rates of survival, defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2, would be higher post protocol. Methods: Basic life support first responders (n = 420) and paramedics (n = 207) underwent training including didactic and hands-on sessions to learn ACD+ITD CPR. The protocol included ACD+ITD CPR initially, with the option to transition to mechanical CPR at 15 minutes. Demographics, response time, CPR duration, initial rhythm, signs of perfusion during CPR, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were recorded prospectively by first responders. Chart review was performed to determine survival to hospital admission and CPC score at discharge. Results: Training occurred October 2016 to March 2017, with protocol change on May 1, 2017. Cases from November 2016-April 2017 (n = 136) and May 2017-November 2017 (n= 103) were reviewed. Complete data were available for 128 subjects pre-protocol change (94%) and 96 subjects (94%) post. Age, gender, response time, rhythm, total CPR time, and rates of bystander CPR and witnessed arrest were similar between groups. Post protocol change, 87% (89/102) received ACD+ITD CPR with median ACD+ITD CPR time of 15 minutes (range 2-300). Pre-protocol, 6/128 (4.7%) subjects survived with CPC score 1 or 2, versus 8/96 (13.5%) subjects post (difference 8.8%, 95% CI 1%-17%). ROSC rates were similar (pre: 54/127, 42.5% post: 44/93, 47%, difference 4.8%, 95% CI -8% - 18%) Conclusions: The change in protocol was straightforward with a high rate of adherence of the system for the recommended duration of therapy. Results are suggestive of a higher rate of neurological survival with the routine use of ACD+ITD CPR in a small cardiac arrest patient population.


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainab Alqudah ◽  
Ziad Nehme ◽  
Brett Williams ◽  
Alaa Oteir ◽  
Karen L Smith

Aim: In this study, we examine the impact of a trauma-based resuscitation protocol on survival outcomes following emergency medical services (EMS) witnessed traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: We included EMS-witnessed OHCAs arising from trauma and occurring between 2008 and 2019. In December 2016, a new resuscitation protocol for traumatic OHCA was introduced prioritizing the treatment of potentially reversible causes before conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The effect of the new protocol on survival outcomes was assessed using adjusted multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Paramedics attempted resuscitation on 490 patients, with 341 (69.6%) and 149 (30.4%) occurring during the control and intervention periods, respectively. A reduction in the proportion of cases receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation and epinephrine administration were found in the intervention period compared to the control period, whereas trauma-based interventions increased significantly, including blood administration (pre-arrest: 17.9% vs 3.7%; intra-arrest: 24.1% vs 2.7%), splinting (pre-arrest: 38.6% vs 17.1%; intra-arrest: 20.7% vs 5.2%), and finger thoracostomy (pre-arrest: 13.1% vs 0.6%; intra-arrest: 22.8% vs 0.9%), respectively, with p-values <0.001 for all comparisons. After adjustment, the trauma-based resuscitation protocol was not associated with an improvement in survival to hospital discharge (AOR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.51-3.23), event survival (AOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.41-1.28) or prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (AOR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39-1.03). Conclusion: In our region, the introduction of a trauma-based resuscitation protocol led to an increase in the delivery of almost all trauma interventions; however, this did not translate into better survival outcomes following EMS-witnessed traumatic OHCA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document