Improving assessment accuracy for lake biological condition by classifying lakes with diatom typology, varying metrics and modeling multimetric indices

2017 ◽  
Vol 609 ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Liu ◽  
R. Jan Stevenson
2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 105862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Ruaro ◽  
Éder André Gubiani ◽  
Robert M. Hughes ◽  
Roger Paulo Mormul

Author(s):  
JoAnna L. Lessard ◽  
Mow Soung Cheng ◽  
Chris Akinbubola ◽  
James B. Stribling ◽  
Erik W. Leppo

Proteomes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. O’Rourke ◽  
Stephanie E. L. Town ◽  
Penelope V. Dalla ◽  
Fiona Bicknell ◽  
Naomi Koh Belic ◽  
...  

The accurate quantification of changes in the abundance of proteins is one of the main applications of proteomics. The maintenance of accuracy can be affected by bias and error that can occur at many points in the experimental process, and normalization strategies are crucial to attempt to overcome this bias and return the sample to its regular biological condition, or normal state. Much work has been published on performing normalization on data post-acquisition with many algorithms and statistical processes available. However, there are many other sources of bias that can occur during experimental design and sample handling that are currently unaddressed. This article aims to cast light on the potential sources of bias and where normalization could be applied to return the sample to its normal state. Throughout we suggest solutions where possible but, in some cases, solutions are not available. Thus, we see this article as a starting point for discussion of the definition of and the issues surrounding the concept of normalization as it applies to the proteomic analysis of biological samples. Specifically, we discuss a wide range of different normalization techniques that can occur at each stage of the sample preparation and analysis process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 661-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Ruaro ◽  
Éder André Gubiani ◽  
Almir Manoel Cunico ◽  
Janet Higuti ◽  
Yara Moretto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 201 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-560
Author(s):  
D. N. Yuriev ◽  
G. V. Zhukovskaya

Research and commercial trawl catches of humpback shrimp Pandalus hypsinotus from the Tatar Strait (Japan Sea) in 2004–2020 were investigated, with bioanalysis of about 45 thousand specimens. Average timing of group molting, spawning, and eggs laying are determined, terms of gonads and eggs development are estimated. Prespawning and molting of the females occur between January-April, with the peaks in early February and middle February, respectively. All oviparous females have 30–40 days to lay eggs, and molt during 50–55 days; the peak of the eggs laying occurs in late June. The males molt in July-August, afterwards the largest individuals change gender and new intersexes are formed. The males have the second molting in October-December, with the peak in late November. In January, after finish of the males molting, a new annual reproduction cycle starts from the prespawning molting of females. Both vitellogenesis and embryogenesis are observed through the year, though females with developing gonads prevail from August to January (because of a long time span between winter and summer moltings while the egg carrying continued 15 months) but oviparous females — from February to July. The individual reproductive cycle of Pandalus hypsinotus in the Tatar Strait lasts 24 months, with 9 months of vitellogenesis (quick growth of gonads) and 15 months of embryogenesis. During the 2-year reproductive cycle, most of females pass through the following stages: i) gonads development (just after eggs laying) when almost all oviparous females (up to 95 % in May) have green gonads under carapace that corresponds to the stage of development «eggs laid — gonads weakly developed»; ii) summer molting from August when females lose hairs on pleopods and the gonads growth accelerates; iii) respawning in January-March (together with the firstly spawning intersexes, with slight delay of the latter); iv) initial developing of eggs during summer; v) stage of «eyed eggs» from December to March; and vi) eggs laying and molting from late March to late May; then the 2-year reproductive cycle repeats.


2022 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 108488
Author(s):  
Kelly O. Maloney ◽  
Kevin P. Krause ◽  
Matthew J. Cashman ◽  
Wesley M. Daniel ◽  
Benjamin P. Gressler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-180
Author(s):  
Minnikova Tatiana Vladimirovna ◽  
◽  
Kolesnikov Sergey Il'ch ◽  
Kazeev Kamil Shagidullovich ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document