scholarly journals Machine learning for geographically differentiated climate change mitigation in urban areas

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 102526
Author(s):  
Nikola Milojevic-Dupont ◽  
Felix Creutzig
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58
Author(s):  
Didem Gunes Yilmaz ◽  

Paris Agreement of December 2015 was the last official initiative led by the United Nations (UN) as the driver of climate change mitigation. Climate change was hence linked with an increase in the occurrence of natural hazards. A variety of initiatives were consequently adopted under different themes such as sustainable cities, climate-friendly development and low-carbon cities. However, most of the initiatives targeted by global cities with urban areas being the focus in terms of taking action against global warming issues. This is due to the structural and environmental features of cities characterized by being populated, as such, they not only generate a large number of carbon emissions but also happens to be the biggest consumer of natural resources. In turn, they create a microclimate, which contributes to climate change. Masdar City, for example, was designed as the first fully sustainable urban area, which replaced fuel-based energy with the electric-based energy. China, as another example, introduced the Sponge Cities action, a method of urban water management to mitigate against flooding. Consequently, architects and urban planners are urged to conform to the proposals that would mitigate global warming. This paper, as a result, examines some of the models that have been internationally adopted and thereafter provide the recommendations that can be implemented in large urban areas in Turkey, primarily in Istanbul.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 5999
Author(s):  
Giulia Lucertini ◽  
Gianmarco Di Giustino

Urban and peri-urban areas are subject to major societal challenges, like food security, climate change, biodiversity, resource efficiency, land management, social cohesion, and economic growth. In that context, Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture (UPA), thanks to its multifunctionality, could have a high value in providing social, economic, and environmental co-benefits. UPA is an emerging field of research and production that aims to improve food security and climate change impact reduction, improving urban resilience and sustainability. In this paper, a replicable GIS-based approach was used to localize and quantify available areas for agriculture, including both flat rooftop and ground-level areas in the mainland of the city of Venice (Italy). Then, possible horticultural yield production was estimated considering common UPA yield value and average Italian consumption. Climate change mitigation, like CO2 reduction and sequestration, and climate change adaptation, like Urban Flooding and Urban Heat Island reduction, due to the new UPA areas’ development were estimated. Despite the urban density, the identified areas have the potential to produce enough vegetables for the residents and improve climate change mitigation and adaptation, if transformed into agricultural areas. Finally, the paper concludes with a reflection on the co-benefits of UPA multifunctionality, and with some policy suggestions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Kristine Belesova ◽  
Max Callaghan ◽  
Jan C Minx ◽  
Felix Creutzig ◽  
Catalina Turcu ◽  
...  

Cities produce more than 70% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Action by cities is therefore crucial for climate change mitigation as well as for safeguarding the health and wellbeing of their populations under climate change. Many city governments have made ambitious commitments to climate change mitigation and adaptation and implemented a range of actions to address them. However, a systematic record and synthesis of the findings of evaluations of the effect of such actions on human health and wellbeing is currently lacking. This, in turn, impedes the development of robust knowledge on what constitutes high-impact climate actions of benefit to human health and wellbeing, which can inform future action plans, their implementation and scale-up. The development of a systematic record of studies reporting climate and health actions in cities is made challenging by the broad landscape of relevant literature scattered across many disciplines and sectors, which is challenging to effectively consolidate using traditional literature review methods. This protocol reports an innovative approach for the systematic development of a database of studies of climate change mitigation and adaptation actions implemented in cities, and their benefits (or disbenefits) for human health and wellbeing, derived from peer-reviewed academic literature. Our approach draws on extensive tailored search strategies and machine learning methods for article classification and tagging to generate a database for subsequent systematic reviews addressing questions of importance to urban decision-makers on climate actions in cities for human health and wellbeing.


Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1246
Author(s):  
Manuel Delgado-Capel ◽  
Paloma Cariñanos

Present-day dense cities are increasingly affected by the impacts associated with climate change. The recurrence of extreme climate events is projected to be intensified in cities in the next decades, especially in the most vulnerable areas of the world, such as the Mediterranean region. In this context, the urban green infrastructure (UGI) is presented as a nature-based solution that directly contributes to climate change mitigation in Mediterranean compact cities and improves health, social, welfare, and environmental conditions for inhabitants. This research sets out a manageable framework to define, locate, and categorize more functional green urban and peri-urban areas in a dense Mediterranean city. It takes spatial distribution, extension, and the capacity to improve inhabitants’ wellbeing through the provision of ecosystem services as classification criteria. Results show a scenario with a greater functional green surface available for the citizens to be managed. Identified areas have been categorized as cores, nodes, links, and green spaces defined as “other” areas. In particular, the latter play a significant role at social, structural, and ecological levels. The study showcases that rethinking urban design and strategic decision-making around these areas can enhance green equity in Mediterranean dense cities, their capacity to better deal with environmental extremes, and the inhabitants’ engagement with a culture of sustainability and wellbeing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Brand ◽  
Thomas Goetschi ◽  
Evi Dons ◽  
Regine Gerike ◽  
Esther Anaya-Boig ◽  
...  

Abstract Active travel (walking or cycling for transport) is generally good for health, the environment and the economy. Yet the net effects of changes in active travel on changes in mobility-related CO2 emissions are complex and under-researched. Here we collected longitudinal data on daily travel behavior, mode choice, as well as personal and geospatial characteristics in seven European cities and derived mobility-related lifecycle CO2 emissions from daily travel activity over time and space. Fixed- and mixed-effects modelling of longitudinal panel data (n=1849) was performed to assess the associations between changes in lifecycle CO2 emissions and changes in transport mode use (primary exposure), main mode of travel, and cycling frequency (secondary exposures). Daily mobility-related lifecycle CO2 emissions were 2.8 kgCO2 per person at baseline, with car travel contributing 69% and cycling 1%. At follow-up, mobility-related lifecycle CO2 emissions were -0.52 (95%CI -0.82 to -0.21) kgCO2/day lower per additional cycling trip, -0.41 (95%CI -0.69 to -0.12) kgCO2/day lower per additional walking trip, and -2.11 (95%CI -1.78 to -2.43) kgCO2/day lower per ‘avoided’ car trip. An average person cycling 1 trip/day more and driving 1 trip/day less for 200 days a year would decrease mobility-related lifecycle CO2 emissions by about 0.5 tonnes over a year. Those who changed from ‘not cycling’ to ‘cycling’ decreased daily CO2 emissions by -2.54 (95%CI -3.90 to -1.17) kgCO2/day. Mobility-related CO2 emissions decreased by -9.28 (95%CI -11.46 to -7.11) kg/day for those who changed their ‘main mode’ from car, van or motorbike to active travel. Extensive sensitivity analyses by city, journey purpose and key personal characteristics largely confirmed our results. Active travel is shown to substitute for motorized travel, with significant climate change mitigation effects. Even if not all car trips could be substituted by active travel the potential for decreasing emissions is considerable and significant. Investing in and promoting active travel should therefore be a cornerstone of strategies to meet net zero carbon targets, particularly in urban areas, while also improving public health and quality of urban life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document