Weight loss from lifestyle interventions and severity of sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1173-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana J. Mitchell ◽  
Zoe E. Davidson ◽  
Maxine Bonham ◽  
Denise M. O'Driscoll ◽  
Garun S. Hamilton ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 750-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almudena Carneiro‐Barrera ◽  
Amparo Díaz‐Román ◽  
Alejandro Guillén‐Riquelme ◽  
Gualberto Buela‐Casal

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 83-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Naslund ◽  
Karen L. Whiteman ◽  
Gregory J. McHugo ◽  
Kelly A. Aschbrenner ◽  
Lisa A. Marsch ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1162-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingwei Xiang ◽  
Hongyu Wu ◽  
An Pan ◽  
Bhakti Patel ◽  
Guangda Xiang ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4118
Author(s):  
Mingling Chen ◽  
Gebresilasea Gendisha Ukke ◽  
Lisa J. Moran ◽  
Surbhi Sood ◽  
Christie J. Bennett ◽  
...  

Lifestyle intervention is effective in preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the efficacy of intervention components across different ethnic groups is less clear. This systematic review examined the effects of intervention characteristics of lifestyle interventions on diabetes incidence and weight loss by ethnicity using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were searched for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on lifestyle interventions (diet and/or physical activity) in adults at risk of T2DM. Ethnicity was categorized into European, South Asian, East and Southeast Asian, Middle Eastern, Latin American and African groups. Forty-five studies (18,789 participants) were included in the systematic review and 41 studies in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed a high number of intervention sessions was significantly associated with a greater reduction in diabetes incidence (P = 0.043) and weight (P = 0.015), while other intervention characteristics including intervention provider and delivery format did not alter the outcomes (all P > 0.05). Additionally, narrative synthesis showed long-term interventions (≥12 months) were associated with significant diabetes risk reduction for all ethnic groups, while short-term interventions (<12 months) were more effective in weight loss in most ethnic groups. There may be ethnic preferences for the optimal number of intervention sessions.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e020876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Dong ◽  
Brian Y Hong ◽  
Ashley M Yu ◽  
John Cathey ◽  
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam ◽  
...  

IntroductionObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is caused by complete or partial obstruction of the upper airway resulting in repeated episodes of interrupted or shallow breaths. OSA is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The prevalence is estimated to range from 3% to 7% in the general population but may be much higher. Several studies show that weight loss or bariatric surgery may have a role in treating OSA. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the safety and efficacy of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of weight loss surgery for adults with OSA and comorbid obesity.Methods and analysisA search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE and two major Chinese biomedical databases will be performed to identify related trials published as of October 2018. This study will include RCTs, comparing different types of weight loss surgery for OSA with obesity or weight loss surgery for OSA with obesity with other upper airway surgeries. The primary outcomes that will be measured are apnoea–hypopnoea index, excess weight loss and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes will include duration of hospital stay, neck circumference, reoperation, waist circumference, body mass index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, overt complications (eg, gastric fistula, bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection), quality of life, quality of sleep and/or functionality. The systematic review will be conducted according to the recommendations as outlined by the Cochrane collaboration.Ethics and disseminationThe systematic review and meta-analysis will include published data available online and thus ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Review updates will be conducted if there is new evidence that may cause any change in review conclusions. Any changes to the study protocol will be updated in the PROSPERO trial registry accordingly.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017081743.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai-Ming Wong ◽  
Hayley N. Barnes ◽  
Simon A. Joosten ◽  
Shane A. Landry ◽  
Eli Dabscheck ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0245794
Author(s):  
Nathalie LeVasseur ◽  
Wei Cheng ◽  
Sasha Mazzarello ◽  
Mark Clemons ◽  
Lisa Vandermeer ◽  
...  

Background Excess weight has been associated with increased morbidity and a worse prognosis in adult patients with early-stage cancer. The optimal lifestyle interventions to optimize anthropometric measures amongst cancer patients and survivors remain inconsistent. Objective To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise and dietary interventions alone or in combination on anthropometric measures of adult cancer patients and survivors. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Trials Registry was performed. Outcomes of interest included changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. Screening and data collection were performed by two reviewers. Bayesian NMAs were performed. Results Overall, 98 RCTs were included; 75 were incorporated in NMAs (n = 12,199). Groups of intervention strategies included: 3 exercise interventions, 8 dietary interventions, 7 combination interventions of diet and exercise and standard care. Median intervention duration was 26 weeks. NMA suggested that diet alone (mean difference [MD] -2.25kg, 95% CrI -3.43 to -0.91kg) and combination strategies (MD -2.52kg, 95% CrI -3.54 to -1.62kg) were associated with more weight loss compared to standard care. All dietary interventions achieved a similar magnitude of weight loss (MD range from -2.03kg to -2.52kg). Both diet alone and combination strategies demonstrated greater BMI reductions versus standard care, and each of diet alone, exercise alone and combination strategies demonstrated greater reductions in waist circumference than standard care. Conclusion Diet and exercise alone or in combination are effective lifestyle interventions to improve anthropometric measures in cancer patients and survivors. All reputable diets appear to be similarly effective to achieve weight loss.


BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n2771
Author(s):  
Helen Saul ◽  
Deniz Gursul

The study Abbott S, Smith E, Tighe B, Lycett D. Group versus one-to-one multi-component lifestyle interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Hum Nutr Diet 2021;34:485-93. To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/group-weight-loss-programmes-more-effective-than-one-to-one-sessions/


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document