Mobility-based environmental justice: Understanding housing disparity in real-time exposure to air pollution and momentary psychological stress in Beijing, China

2021 ◽  
pp. 114372
Author(s):  
Yinhua Tao ◽  
Yanwei Chai ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Mei-Po Kwan
2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (17) ◽  
pp. 12106-12115
Author(s):  
Guannan Geng ◽  
Qingyang Xiao ◽  
Shigan Liu ◽  
Xiaodong Liu ◽  
Jing Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 974-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxia Ma ◽  
Yuxin Zhao ◽  
Sixu Yang ◽  
Jianding Zhou ◽  
Jinyuan Xin ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 909-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Mitchell ◽  
Danny Dorling

This paper presents the results of the first national study of air quality in Britain to consider the implications of its distribution across over ten thousand local communities in terms of potential environmental injustice. We consider the recent history of the environmental justice debate in Britain, Europe, and the USA and, in the light of this, estimate how one aspect of air pollution, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels, affects different population groups differentially across Britain. We also estimate the extent to which people living in each community in Britain contribute towards this pollution, with the aid of information on the characteristics of the vehicles they own. We find that, although community NO x emission and ambient NO2 concentration are strongly related, the communities that have access to fewest cars tend to suffer from the highest levels of air pollution, whereas those in which car ownership is greatest enjoy the cleanest air. Pollution is most concentrated in areas where young children and their parents are more likely to live and least concentrated in areas to which the elderly tend to migrate. Those communities that are most polluted and which also emit the least pollution tend to be amongst the poorest in Britain. There is therefore evidence of environmental injustice in the distribution and production of poor air quality in Britain. However, the spatial distribution of those who produce and receive most of that pollution have to be considered simultaneously to see this injustice clearly.


Alcohol ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Chun Lin ◽  
David Kinnamon ◽  
Devangsingh Sankhala ◽  
Sriram Muthukumar ◽  
Shalini Prasad

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Ravetti ◽  
Tim Swanson ◽  
Yana Jin ◽  
Quan Mu ◽  
Shiqiu Zhang

AbstractThis paper analyses the implications of government control over public information about air pollution. First, we model the incentives for a local government with control over the media to affect popular perception concerning pollution. We argue that biased announcements can influence the inflows of labour force in a municipality beyond economic factors. Then, we examine some evidence on information misreporting in the context of Beijing, China. We show that official air pollution announcements diverge systematically from an alternative source of information, provided by the US Embassy. The results point at a manipulation of popular perception consistent with the motives indicated in our model. Furthermore, using an original household survey, we examine whether the distorted public signal affects agents' behaviour. We find that households that depend upon government-controlled media are significantly less responsive to pollution peaks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document