scholarly journals Zinc Fingers 10 and 11 of Miz-1 undergo conformational exchange to achieve specific DNA binding

Structure ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Boisvert ◽  
Danny Létourneau ◽  
Patrick Delattre ◽  
Cynthia Tremblay ◽  
Émilie Jolibois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Conformational Exchange

Only two of the five zinc fingers of the eukaryotic transcriptional repressor PRDI-BF1 are required for sequence-specific DNA binding

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1940-1949
Author(s):  
A D Keller ◽  
T Maniatis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Transcriptional Repressor ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Sequence Requirements

The eukaryotic transcriptional repressor PRDI-BF1 contains five zinc fingers of the C2H2 type, and the protein binds specifically to PRDI, a 14-bp regulatory element of the beta interferon gene promoter. We have investigated the amino acid sequence requirements for specific binding to PRDI and found that the five zinc fingers and a short stretch of amino acids N terminal to the first finger are necessary and sufficient for PRDI-specific binding. The contribution of individual zinc fingers to DNA binding was investigated by inserting them in various combinations into another zinc finger-containing DNA-binding protein whose own fingers had been removed. We found that insertion of PRDI-BF1 zinc fingers 1 and 2 confer PRDI-binding activity on the recipient protein. In contrast, the insertion of PRDI-BF1 zinc fingers 2 through 5, the insertion of zinc finger 1 or 2 alone, and the insertion of zinc fingers 1 and 2 in reverse order did not confer PRDI-binding activity. We conclude that the first two PRDI-BF1 zinc fingers together are sufficient for the sequence-specific recognition of PRDI.

Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 1593-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Park ◽  
C. Bai ◽  
K.A. Platt ◽  
M.P. Matise ◽  
A. Beeghly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Shh Signaling ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Gli Transcription Factors ◽  
Ventral Spinal Cord

The secreted factor Sonic hedgehog (SHH) is both required for and sufficient to induce multiple developmental processes, including ventralization of the CNS, branching morphogenesis of the lungs and anteroposterior patterning of the limbs. Based on analogy to the Drosophila Hh pathway, the multiple GLI transcription factors in vertebrates are likely to both transduce SHH signaling and repress Shh transcription. In order to discriminate between overlapping versus unique requirements for the three Gli genes in mice, we have produced a Gli1 mutant and analyzed the phenotypes of Gli1/Gli2 and Gli1/3 double mutants. Gli3(xt) mutants have polydactyly and dorsal CNS defects associated with ectopic Shh expression, indicating GLI3 plays a role in repressing Shh. In contrast, Gli2 mutants have five digits, but lack a floorplate, indicating that it is required to transduce SHH signaling in some tissues. Remarkably, mice homozygous for a Gli1(zfd)mutation that deletes the exons encoding the DNA-binding domain are viable and appear normal. Transgenic mice expressing a GLI1 protein lacking the zinc fingers can not induce SHH targets in the dorsal brain, indicating that the Gli1(zfd)allele contains a hypomorphic or null mutation. Interestingly, Gli1(zfd/zfd);Gli2(zfd/+), but not Gli1(zfd/zfd);Gli3(zfd/+) double mutants have a severe phenotype; most Gli1(zfd/zfd);Gli2(zfd/+) mice die soon after birth and all have multiple defects including a variable loss of ventral spinal cord cells and smaller lungs that are similar to, but less extreme than, Gli2(zfd/zfd) mutants. Gli1/Gli2 double homozygous mutants have more extreme CNS and lung defects than Gli1(zfd/zfd);Gli2(zfd/+) mutants, however, in contrast to Shh mutants, ventrolateral neurons develop in the CNS and the limbs have 5 digits with an extra postaxial nubbin. These studies demonstrate that the zinc-finger DNA-binding domain of GLI1 protein is not required for SHH signaling in mouse. Furthermore, Gli1 and Gli2, but not Gli1 and Gli3, have extensive overlapping functions that are likely downstream of SHH signaling.

Transcriptional activity of the zinc finger protein NGFI-A is influenced by its interaction with a cellular factor

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6858-6865
Author(s):  
M W Russo ◽  
C Matheny ◽  
J Milbrandt
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Cellular Factor ◽  
Inhibitory Domain

NGFI-A is an immediate-early gene that encodes a transcription factor whose DNA-binding domain is composed of three zinc fingers. To define the domains responsible for its transcriptional activity, a mutational analysis was conducted with an NGFI-A molecule in which the zinc fingers were replaced by the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. In a cotransfection assay, four activation domains were found within NGFI-A. Three of the activation domains are similar to those characterized previously: one contains a large number of acidic residues, another is enriched in proline and glutamine residues, and another has some sequence homology to a domain found in Krox-20. The fourth bears no resemblance to previously described activation domains. NGFI-A also contains an inhibitory domain whose removal resulted in a 15-fold increase in NGFI-A activity. This increase in activity occurred in all mammalian cell types tested but not in Drosophila S2 cells. Competition experiments in which increasing amounts of the inhibitory domain were cotransfected along with NGFI-A demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in NGFI-A activity. A point mutation within the inhibitory domain of the competitor (I293F) abolished this property. When the analogous mutation was introduced into native NGFI-A, a 17-fold increase in activity was observed. The inhibitory effect therefore appears to be the result of an interaction between this domain and a titratable cellular factor which is weakened by this mutation. Downmodulation of transcription factor activity through interaction with a cellular factor has been observed in several other systems, including the regulation of transcription factor E2F by retinoblastoma protein, and in studies of c-Jun.

scholarly journals Computational study of the effect of protonation states of PSA protein zinc fingers on its DNA binding

2019 ◽  
Vol 1274 ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
Nguyen Viet Duc ◽  
Ly Hai Nguyen ◽  
Hien T. T. Lai ◽  
Toan T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Computational Study ◽  
Zinc Fingers

Relative Contributions of the Zinc Fingers of Transcription Factor IIIA to the Energetics of DNA Binding

1994 ◽  
Vol 244 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen R. Clemens ◽  
Penghua Zhang ◽  
Xiubei Liao ◽  
Steven J. McBryant ◽  
Peter E. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Transcription Factor Iiia

scholarly journals Multitasking C2H2 Zinc Fingers Link Zac DNA Binding to Coordinated Regulation of p300-Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 5544-5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Hoffmann ◽  
Thomas Barz ◽  
Dietmar Spengler
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
First Time ◽  
Recruitment Model ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

ABSTRACT Zac is a C2H2 zinc finger protein that regulates apoptosis and cell cycle arrest through DNA binding and transactivation. The coactivator proteins p300/CBP enhance transactivation through their histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity by modulating chromatin structure. Here, we show that p300 increases Zac transactivation in a strictly HAT-dependent manner. Whereas the classic recruitment model proposes that coactivation simply depends on the capacity of the activator to recruit the coactivator, we demonstrate that coordinated binding of Zac zinc fingers and C terminus to p300 regulates HAT function by increasing histone and acetyl coenzyme A affinities and catalytic activity. This concerted regulation of HAT function is mediated via the KIX and CH3 domains of p300 in an interdependent manner. Interestingly, Zac zinc fingers 6 and 7 simultaneously play key roles in DNA binding and p300 regulation. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, that C2H2 zinc fingers can link DNA binding to HAT signaling and suggest a dynamic role for DNA-binding proteins in the enzymatic control of transcription.

scholarly journals An unusual arrangement of 13 zinc fingers in the vertebrate gene Z13

1995 ◽  
Vol 311 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
T C Schulz ◽  
B Hopwood ◽  
P D Rathjen ◽  
J R Wells
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Structural Organization ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Protein Domain ◽  
Nucleic Acid Binding ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Wide Range

The zinc finger is a protein domain that imparts specific nucleic acid-binding activity on a wide range of functionally important proteins. In this paper we report the molecular cloning and characterization of a novel murine zinc-finger gene, mZ13. Analysis of mZ13 cDNAs revealed that the gene expresses a 794-amino-acid protein encoded by a 2.7 kb transcript. The protein has an unusual arrangement of 13 zinc fingers into a ‘hand’ of 12 tandem fingers and a single isolated finger near the C-terminus. This structural organization is conserved with the probable chicken homologue, cZ13. mZ13 also contained an additional domain at the N-terminus which has previously been implicated in the regulation of zinc-finger transcription factor DNA-binding, via protein-protein interactions. mZ13 expression was detected in a wide range of murine embryonic and adult tissues. The structural organization of mZ13 and its expression profile suggest that it may function as a housekeeping DNA-binding protein that regulates the expression of specific genes.

Functional Differences in GATA-1 Affinity for Double Versus Single GATA-1 Binding Sites Dictate Synergistic Versus Antagonistic Interactions of PU.1 and GATA-1 in Myeloid Gene Transcription.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1608-1608
Author(s):  
Jian Du ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas ◽  
Qing Xi ◽  
Steven J. Ackerman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Dual Versus ◽  
P2 Promoter ◽  
Dual Site

Abstract Instructive roles for both GATA-1 and PU.1 have been demonstrated in hematopoiesis, and recent studies have identified both antagonistic and synergistic interactions between them in myeloid gene transcription and lineage development. In prior studies, we reported that PU.1 synergizes with rather than antagonizes GATA-1 for transactivation of a hallmark eosinophil gene, the major basic protein P2 promoter (MBP-P2), which possesses a novel dual (double) GATA-binding site, similar to the palindromic double site in the murine GATA-1 control locus that may specify eosinophil lineage-specific expression of GATA-1 and eosinophil development. To address the transcriptional mechanism for PU.1-GATA-1 synergy through the MBP-P2 dual GATA site, we investigated GATA-1 and PU.1 physical and functonal interactions via their binding sites in the MBP-P2 promoter. DNA binding affinities of GATA-1 and its C- versus N-terminal zinc fingers were assessed for single versus double GATA sites in the presence or absence of PU.1. Our results show that the dual GATA site strongly binds full length GATA-1 with higher affinity than either of the single sites, using both zinc fingers, but that mutant GATA-1 proteins with C-finger or N-finger deletions retain their ability to bind, albeit at lower affinity, to the dual site. DNA binding activities of the two zinc fingers with the dual GATA site were confirmed using peptides containing only the C-finger or N-finger region. Of note, formation of GATA-1 complexes with the dual GATA site was not inhibited by the addition of PU.1, whereas formation of binding complexes for mutants of GATA-1 containing only the C- or N-finger region could be completely inhibited in a dose-response fashion by PU.1. These unique features of PU.1/GATA-1 interactions on a dual versus single GATA-1 site were confirmed using peptides containing only the C- or N-finger regions of GATA-1. Our findings indicate that both zinc fingers of GATA-1 are involved in formation of the high-affinity GATA-1 complex with the dual site. Importantly, we show that the higher affinity dual GATA-1 site complex is not affected by the addition of PU.1, whereas formation of the binding complex with a single GATA-1 site is eliminated by PU.1, emphasizing the different mechanisms of GATA-1/PU.1 interactions on dual versus single GATA binding sites. Functional analyses by transactivation confirmed that synergistic activation of the MBP-P2 promoter by GATA-1 and PU.1 is mediated by their protein-protein interactions through this unique high affinity dual GATA-1 binding site. We suggest two possible mechanisms for PU.1/GATA-1 synergy on dual GATA sites: (1) PU.1 may change GATA-1 conformation and its high affinity for the dual site, enhancing its availability for interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery. Alternatively, (2) PU.1 could impede interactions of GATA-1 with a co-repressor, e.g. FOG-1, which we and others have shown represses GATA-1 function in the eosinophil lineage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document