A new rapid bedside assay for quantitative testing of D-Dimer (Cardiac D-Dimer) in the diagnostic work-up for deep vein thrombosis

2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Legnani ◽  
Simone Fariselli ◽  
Michela Cini ◽  
Gaetana Oca ◽  
Carmela Abate ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (04) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanno Riess ◽  
Viola Hach-Wunderle ◽  
Horst Gerlach ◽  
Heike Carnarius ◽  
Sonja Eberle ◽  
...  

SummaryIt is uncertain whether gender influences the clinical presentation of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and the discriminative value of the Wells diagnostic pretest probability score. The aim of the study was to determine whether gender impacts the clinical presentation and diagnosis of DVT. The study analysed a cohort of 4,976 outpatients with clinically suspected DVT of the leg prospectively recruited by 326 vascular medicine physicians in the German ambulatory care sector between October and December 2005. The diagnosis of DVT was based on compression ultrasonography in 96% of patients. Among 4,777 patients who had a diagnostic work-up for DVT there were more women (n=2,998) than men (n=1,779). However, the prevalence of confirmed DVT was 37.0% (658/1779) in men vs. 24.3% (730/2,998) in women (p<0.001). Among patients with confirmed DVT, proximal DVT was more common in men (59.6% vs. 44.5% in women, p<0.001). Swelling of the leg, pitting oedema and dilated superficial veins were more frequently reported by men (p<0.001). The percentage of patients with a high probability Wells clinical pretest score was higher in men than in women (67.0% vs. 57.0%, p<0.001). However, overall, the score equally discriminated risk groups for DVT in both sexes. In conclusion, women were more frequently referred for a diagnostic work-up for DVT than men, but the prevalence of DVT was higher in men and their thrombotic events were more severe. Nevertheless, the Wells clinical pretest probability score correctly identified low- and high-risk groups in both genders.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (05) ◽  
pp. 807-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Haas ◽  
Mariette Agterof ◽  
Marike Vos ◽  
Douwe Biesma ◽  
Roger Schutgens

SummaryDespite the use of a clinical score and D-dimers to exclude deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the majority of patients still need repeated ultrasound (US).The aim of the study was to investigate whether fibrin monomers (FMs), as markers of thrombin generation, have additional value in the diagnosis of DVT. This is a posthoc analysis of 464 outpatients, participants in a management study using D-dimers (Tina-Quant® ) and a clinical score in the exclusion of DVT. Two new FM assays (Auto LIA-FM® and IATRO SF®, Japan) were performed. Overall sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity of the D-dimer test were 98%, 98% and 42%.The optimal cut-off point for the Auto LIAFM test was ≤ 3 µ g/ml with values of 88%, 88% and 59%, respectively. The IATRO SF test had an optimal cut-off point of ≤ 2 µ g/ ml with values of 92%, 81 and 22%, respectively.The NPV of a non-high clinical score and a normal D-dimer (n=97) was 100%. In patients with a high clinical score (n=160), the NPV of the D-dimer was 88%. In these patients, a single US combined with a normal D-dimer or FM test had an equal NPV as serial US (100 versus 98%, respectively) and lead to a reduction in the need for US by 36–53%, respectively. In patients with abnormal D-dimer concentrations (n=343), a normal US combined with a normal Auto LIA-FM test had a NPV of 97%,which was also true for serial US.This could lead to a reduction in the need for US by 45%. The present studied FMs are inferior to theTina-Quant D-dimer test when used as primary screening tool to exclude DVT.Adding these FMs to patients with a normal Tina-Quant D-dimer has no benefit. In patients with a high pretest clinical probability score, a single US in combination with a normal D-dimer or FM test might be as safe as serial US. In patients with abnormal D-dimer concentrations and a normal US, a normal FM test might be able to replace the second US.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. P-W-517-P-W-517
Author(s):  
S.M. Schellong ◽  
H. Gerlach ◽  
V. Hach-Wunderle ◽  
E. Rabe ◽  
H.B. Riess ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2806-2810
Author(s):  
Frederikus A. Klok ◽  
Charlotte E. A. Dronkers ◽  
Menno V. Huisman

The diagnostic work-up of upper and of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis starts with the assessment of the pre-test probability by using a validated clinical decision rule, followed by imaging if deep vein thrombosis cannot reliably be rule out. For splanchnic vein thrombosis and cerebral vein thrombosis, the diagnostic assessment starts with imaging. Currently, the imaging techniques most widely used in clinical practice are compression ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, with a diagnostic standard dependent on the specific site of the venous thrombosis. This chapter provides an overview of the diagnostic accuracy and potential pitfalls of imaging techniques for the different sites of venous thrombosis.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3405-3405
Author(s):  
Pape-Mamadou Sene ◽  
Denis Yahiaoui ◽  
Maral Koolian ◽  
Vicky Tagalakis

Background Ambulatory management of isolated acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the standard of care in most patient populations, and in clinical practice is mostly initiated in the emergency department (ED). However, patients referred to the ED with suspected DVT often experience unnecessary delays to diagnosis and subsequent long stays to determine appropriate treatment and follow up care. We implemented a DVT ambulatory care pathway that does not include the ED for referred patients with suspected isolated DVT that begins with pre-test risk stratification in the community and subsequent algorithm-based diagnostic work-up, treatment, and follow-up at a tertiary care centre in Montreal Canada. Objective To determine the diagnostic performance of a non-ED based DVT ambulatory care pathway. Methods We determined the prevalence of DVT over a 46 week period between August 2018 and June 2019 among ambulatory patients with suspected isolated DVT who following community-based risk stratification using the modified Well's clinical prediction score were referred for diagnostic work up and treatment using a newly implemented non-ED based DVT ambulatory care pathway. Results Among 122 patients referred by community physicians, 86 (70%) met pre-defined pathway criteria for assessment of suspected DVT. In all, 42 (49%) were referred with an unlikely/low modified Well's score and 44 (51%) with a likely/high score. Overall, the prevalence of DVT was 19.8%, specifically 9.5% in the unlikely/low and 30.2% in the likely/high pretest probability groups, respectively. Conclusion Our results show that the diagnostic performance of a non-ED based acute DVT ambulatory care pathway is in line with literature estimates. The advantage of this pathway is that it offers clear, evidence-based guidance for community physicians to diagnosis and treat patients in an ambulatory setting without using the ED. The approach is likely to result in both healthcare and economic benefits, including increased patient satisfaction and shorter ED stays. Disclosures Tagalakis: Sanofi Aventis: Other: investigator initiated grant;participated on ad boards; Pfizer: Other: participated on ad boards; BMS-Pfizer: Other: participated on ad boards; Servier: Other: participated on ad boards; Bayer: Other: participated on ad boards.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1061-1061
Author(s):  
Rossella Rosari Cacciola ◽  
Veronica Vecchio ◽  
Elio Gentilini Cacciola ◽  
Emma Cacciola

Abstract COVID-19 vaccination campagnies with several vaccines types are currently undeway. Recently, the ASTRA ZENECA vaccine has raised public alarm with concerns regarding the development of thrombotic events known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Early and limited studies have implicated an antibody-mediated platelet activation as the mechanism of the clotting events. Aim of this study was to investigate the platelet and coagulation activation using specialized tests. In this study we enrolled 60 patients (40 men, 20 women; mean age 55±10 years) without cardiovascular risk factors or a history of thrombosis who reported having poplitea deep vein thrombosis (35/60) and pulmonary embolism (25/60) revealed with lower-limb ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) angiography, respectively, 7 days after vaccination with ASTRA ZENECA. All patients were evaluated for initial testing such as platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fib) and D-dimer (DD). Platelets were measured by automated analyzer, PT and APTT by coagulometric test, Fib using Clauss method, and DD using ELISA. Complete blood hemostasis was studied by platelet function assay (PFA-100) on Collagen/ADP (CT-ADP) and Collagen/Epinephrine (CT-EPI) cartridges and Thromboelastometry method on Clotting Time (CT), Clotting Formation Time (CFT), Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF), and clot lysis at 30 minutes (LY-30). All patients had thrombocytopenia (60±5x109/L), longer PT (28±10 s) and PTT (50±10 s), lower Fib (80±20 mg/dl), higher DD ((550±100 mg/l). All patients had shorter C/ADP and C/EPI (C/ADP, n.v. 68-121 s (42±10 s) and C/EPI n.v. 84-160 s (38±5 s) and shorter CT (CT, unit: s. n.v. 100-240 s) (INTEM 30±20 s, EXTEM 18±10 s), shorter CFT (CFT, unit: s, n.v. 30-160 s (INTEM 11±10 s, EXTEM 19±10 s), longer MCF (MCF, unit: mm, n.v. 50-72 mm (INTEM 128±10 mm, EXTEM 110±10 mm), and lower LY-30 (LY-30, %: v.n. 15% (INTEM 0.8%, EXTEM 0.7%). These interesting findings may be the novelty in the diagnostic work-up of the VITT. If these tests may aid in the diagnosis of VITT deserve to be confirmed and need reproducing in other studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (02) ◽  
pp. 180-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. de Moerloose

SummaryD-dimer measurement has proven to be very useful to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in symptomatic outpatients (1). The problem faced by many physicians is the choice and the position of the D-Dimer tests in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In the last and present issues of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, two very interesting studies addressing these questions were published.In the first paper (2), de Groot and colleagues evaluated, in a management study, the clinical utility of incorporating the SimpliRED assay in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected PE. Of the 245 study subjects, 59 did not receive anticoagulant therapy on the basis of a nondiagnostic lung scan, a normal D-dimer and a non-high clinical probability of PE. In the follow-up, only one patient experienced a thromboembolic event (which can be compared with the 6% of subsequent rate of VTE in the follow-up of the 54 patients with a normal perfusion lung scan). However, if SimpliRED D-dimer would have been used alone as a first exclusion step, 6 of 61 patients with proven PE had been missed (9.8%, 95% CI 3.7-20.2).


1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-032 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Boneu ◽  
G Bes ◽  
H Pelzer ◽  
P Sié ◽  
H Boccalon

SummaryThis study was performed to determine the accuracy of D-Dimer fibrin derivatives, thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) complexes and prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F 1 + 2) determinations for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients referred to the angiology unit of our hospital for a clinically suspected DVT were investigated. They were submitted to mercury strain gauge plethysmography and to ultrasonic duplex scanning examination; in cases of inconclusive results or of proximal DVT (n = 35), an ascending phlebography was performed. After these investigations were completed, the diagnosis of DVT was confirmed in 34 and excluded in 82. One half of the patients were already under anticoagulant therapy at the time of investigation. The 3 biological markers were assayed using commercially available ELISA techniques and the D-Dimer was also assayed with a fast latex method. The normal distribution of these markers was established in 40 healthy blood donors. The most accurate assay for the diagnosis of DVT was the D-Dimer ELISA which had both a high sensitivity (94%) and a high negative predictive value (95%). The D-Dirner latex, TAT complexes and F 1 + 2 were far less sensitive and provided negative predictive values which ranged between 78 and 85%. In spite of positive and significant correlations between the levels of ihe 3 markers, their association did not improve their overall accuracy for detecting D\/L Therefore, with the exception of the D-Dimer ELISA, these markers were of little value for the diagnosis of DVT in this specific population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document