scholarly journals The Diagnostic Performance of a Non-Emergency Department-Based Deep Vein Thrombosis Ambulatory Care Pathway

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3405-3405
Author(s):  
Pape-Mamadou Sene ◽  
Denis Yahiaoui ◽  
Maral Koolian ◽  
Vicky Tagalakis

Background Ambulatory management of isolated acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the standard of care in most patient populations, and in clinical practice is mostly initiated in the emergency department (ED). However, patients referred to the ED with suspected DVT often experience unnecessary delays to diagnosis and subsequent long stays to determine appropriate treatment and follow up care. We implemented a DVT ambulatory care pathway that does not include the ED for referred patients with suspected isolated DVT that begins with pre-test risk stratification in the community and subsequent algorithm-based diagnostic work-up, treatment, and follow-up at a tertiary care centre in Montreal Canada. Objective To determine the diagnostic performance of a non-ED based DVT ambulatory care pathway. Methods We determined the prevalence of DVT over a 46 week period between August 2018 and June 2019 among ambulatory patients with suspected isolated DVT who following community-based risk stratification using the modified Well's clinical prediction score were referred for diagnostic work up and treatment using a newly implemented non-ED based DVT ambulatory care pathway. Results Among 122 patients referred by community physicians, 86 (70%) met pre-defined pathway criteria for assessment of suspected DVT. In all, 42 (49%) were referred with an unlikely/low modified Well's score and 44 (51%) with a likely/high score. Overall, the prevalence of DVT was 19.8%, specifically 9.5% in the unlikely/low and 30.2% in the likely/high pretest probability groups, respectively. Conclusion Our results show that the diagnostic performance of a non-ED based acute DVT ambulatory care pathway is in line with literature estimates. The advantage of this pathway is that it offers clear, evidence-based guidance for community physicians to diagnosis and treat patients in an ambulatory setting without using the ED. The approach is likely to result in both healthcare and economic benefits, including increased patient satisfaction and shorter ED stays. Disclosures Tagalakis: Sanofi Aventis: Other: investigator initiated grant;participated on ad boards; Pfizer: Other: participated on ad boards; BMS-Pfizer: Other: participated on ad boards; Servier: Other: participated on ad boards; Bayer: Other: participated on ad boards.

2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Legnani ◽  
Simone Fariselli ◽  
Michela Cini ◽  
Gaetana Oca ◽  
Carmela Abate ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (04) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanno Riess ◽  
Viola Hach-Wunderle ◽  
Horst Gerlach ◽  
Heike Carnarius ◽  
Sonja Eberle ◽  
...  

SummaryIt is uncertain whether gender influences the clinical presentation of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and the discriminative value of the Wells diagnostic pretest probability score. The aim of the study was to determine whether gender impacts the clinical presentation and diagnosis of DVT. The study analysed a cohort of 4,976 outpatients with clinically suspected DVT of the leg prospectively recruited by 326 vascular medicine physicians in the German ambulatory care sector between October and December 2005. The diagnosis of DVT was based on compression ultrasonography in 96% of patients. Among 4,777 patients who had a diagnostic work-up for DVT there were more women (n=2,998) than men (n=1,779). However, the prevalence of confirmed DVT was 37.0% (658/1779) in men vs. 24.3% (730/2,998) in women (p<0.001). Among patients with confirmed DVT, proximal DVT was more common in men (59.6% vs. 44.5% in women, p<0.001). Swelling of the leg, pitting oedema and dilated superficial veins were more frequently reported by men (p<0.001). The percentage of patients with a high probability Wells clinical pretest score was higher in men than in women (67.0% vs. 57.0%, p<0.001). However, overall, the score equally discriminated risk groups for DVT in both sexes. In conclusion, women were more frequently referred for a diagnostic work-up for DVT than men, but the prevalence of DVT was higher in men and their thrombotic events were more severe. Nevertheless, the Wells clinical pretest probability score correctly identified low- and high-risk groups in both genders.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1061-1061
Author(s):  
Rossella Rosari Cacciola ◽  
Veronica Vecchio ◽  
Elio Gentilini Cacciola ◽  
Emma Cacciola

Abstract COVID-19 vaccination campagnies with several vaccines types are currently undeway. Recently, the ASTRA ZENECA vaccine has raised public alarm with concerns regarding the development of thrombotic events known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Early and limited studies have implicated an antibody-mediated platelet activation as the mechanism of the clotting events. Aim of this study was to investigate the platelet and coagulation activation using specialized tests. In this study we enrolled 60 patients (40 men, 20 women; mean age 55±10 years) without cardiovascular risk factors or a history of thrombosis who reported having poplitea deep vein thrombosis (35/60) and pulmonary embolism (25/60) revealed with lower-limb ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) angiography, respectively, 7 days after vaccination with ASTRA ZENECA. All patients were evaluated for initial testing such as platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fib) and D-dimer (DD). Platelets were measured by automated analyzer, PT and APTT by coagulometric test, Fib using Clauss method, and DD using ELISA. Complete blood hemostasis was studied by platelet function assay (PFA-100) on Collagen/ADP (CT-ADP) and Collagen/Epinephrine (CT-EPI) cartridges and Thromboelastometry method on Clotting Time (CT), Clotting Formation Time (CFT), Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF), and clot lysis at 30 minutes (LY-30). All patients had thrombocytopenia (60±5x109/L), longer PT (28±10 s) and PTT (50±10 s), lower Fib (80±20 mg/dl), higher DD ((550±100 mg/l). All patients had shorter C/ADP and C/EPI (C/ADP, n.v. 68-121 s (42±10 s) and C/EPI n.v. 84-160 s (38±5 s) and shorter CT (CT, unit: s. n.v. 100-240 s) (INTEM 30±20 s, EXTEM 18±10 s), shorter CFT (CFT, unit: s, n.v. 30-160 s (INTEM 11±10 s, EXTEM 19±10 s), longer MCF (MCF, unit: mm, n.v. 50-72 mm (INTEM 128±10 mm, EXTEM 110±10 mm), and lower LY-30 (LY-30, %: v.n. 15% (INTEM 0.8%, EXTEM 0.7%). These interesting findings may be the novelty in the diagnostic work-up of the VITT. If these tests may aid in the diagnosis of VITT deserve to be confirmed and need reproducing in other studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (02) ◽  
pp. 180-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. de Moerloose

SummaryD-dimer measurement has proven to be very useful to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in symptomatic outpatients (1). The problem faced by many physicians is the choice and the position of the D-Dimer tests in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In the last and present issues of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, two very interesting studies addressing these questions were published.In the first paper (2), de Groot and colleagues evaluated, in a management study, the clinical utility of incorporating the SimpliRED assay in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected PE. Of the 245 study subjects, 59 did not receive anticoagulant therapy on the basis of a nondiagnostic lung scan, a normal D-dimer and a non-high clinical probability of PE. In the follow-up, only one patient experienced a thromboembolic event (which can be compared with the 6% of subsequent rate of VTE in the follow-up of the 54 patients with a normal perfusion lung scan). However, if SimpliRED D-dimer would have been used alone as a first exclusion step, 6 of 61 patients with proven PE had been missed (9.8%, 95% CI 3.7-20.2).


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. P-W-517-P-W-517
Author(s):  
S.M. Schellong ◽  
H. Gerlach ◽  
V. Hach-Wunderle ◽  
E. Rabe ◽  
H.B. Riess ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 1234-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horst Gerlach ◽  
Viola Hach-Wunderle ◽  
Eberhard Rabe ◽  
Hanno Riess ◽  
Heike Carnarius ◽  
...  

SummaryCurrent guidelines recommend optimised algorithms for diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). There is little data to determine to what extent real-world health care adheres to guidelines, and which outcome in terms of diagnostic efficiency and safety is achieved. This registry involved patients with clinically suspected DVT of the leg recruited in German ambulatory care between October and December 2005. Registry items were: diagnostic methods applied; diagnostic categories at day 1; and venous thromboembolic events up to 90 days in patients without firmly established DVT. A total of 4,976 patients were recruited in 326 centres. Venous ultrasonography was performed in 4,770 patients (96%), D-dimer assay in 1,773 patients (36%) and venography in 288 patients (6%). At day 1, DVT was confirmed in 1,388 patients (28%), and ruled out in 3,389 patients (68%), and work-up was inconclusive in 199 patients (4%).The rate of venous thromboembolism at 90 days was 0.34% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 to 0.88) in patients in whom the diagnosis of DVT had been ruled out, and 2.50% (95% CI: 0.69 to 6.28) in patients with inconclusive diagnostic workup. This nationwide evaluation in German ambulatory care revealed that the diagnostic work-up for suspected DVT did not adhere to current guidelines. However, the overall diagnostic safety was excellent, although there is potential for improvement in a well defined minority of patients.The TULIPA registry was funded by GlaxoSmithKline GmbH und Co KG, Munich.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e022063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy J Bungard ◽  
Bruce Ritchie ◽  
Jennifer Bolt ◽  
William M Semchuk

ObjectiveTo compare the characteristics/management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) for patients either discharged directly from the emergency department (ED) or hospitalised throughout a year within two urban cities in Canada.DesignRetrospective medical record review.SettingHospitals in Edmonton, Alberta (n=4) and Regina, Saskatchewan (n=2) from April 2014 to March 2015.ParticipantsAll patients discharged from the ED or hospital with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (PE). Those having another indication for anticoagulant therapy, pregnant/breast feeding or anticipated lifespan <3 months were excluded.Primary and secondary outcomesPrimarily, to compare proportion of patients receiving traditional therapy (parenteral anticoagulant±warfarin) relative to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) between the two cohorts. Secondarily, to assess differences with therapy selected based on clot burden and follow-up plans postdischarge.Results387 (25.2%) and 665 (72.5%) patients from the ED and hospital cohorts, respectively, were included. Compared with the ED cohort, those hospitalised were older (57.3 and 64.5 years; p<0.0001), more likely to have PE (35.7% vs 83.8%) with a simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) ≥1 (31.2% vs 65.2%), cancer (14.7% and 22.3%; p=0.003) and pulmonary disease (10.1% and 20.6%; p<0.0001). For the ED and hospital cohorts, similar proportions of patients were prescribed traditional therapies (72.6% and 71.1%) and a DOAC (25.8% and 27.4%, respectively). For the ED cohort, DOAC use was similar between those with a sPESI score of 0 and ≥1 (35.1% and 34.9%, p=0.98) whereas for those hospitalised lower risk patients were more likely to receive a DOAC (31.4% and 23.8%, p<0.055). Follow-up was most common with family physicians for those hospitalised (51.5%), while specialists/VTE clinic was most common for those directly discharged from the ED (50.6%).ConclusionsTraditional and DOAC therapies were proportionately similar between the ED and hospitalised cohorts, despite clear differences in patient populations and follow-up patterns in the community.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2774-2774
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
Richard Schabath ◽  
Tamara Alpermann ◽  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Flow cytometry (FC) is increasingly used in diagnostic work-up of bone marrow (BM) from patients with suspected or proven myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Data on FC in peripheral blood (PB) is scarce. Aims Evaluate the use of FC for PB in suspected or proven MDS by comparison to BM analyzed during follow-up. Methods PB of 157 patients (pts) with suspected MDS was analyzed by FC applying ELN criteria defined recently for diagnosis of MDS in BM (Westers et al., Leukemia 2012). For all pts during follow-up at least one BM sample was evaluable by morphology, cytogenetics, and FC in parallel to confirm or exclude MDS (according to WHO 2008 criteria). Pts were then grouped according to results obtained from BM analysis during follow-up time points into 1) proven MDS (n=96), 2) no MDS (n=32), and 3) MPN, MDS/MPN, or “MDS possible” (presence of dysplastic features by morphology but not sufficient to diagnose MDS) (n=29) (median time to MDS confirmation, 0.9 months, range, 0.1-53.0; median time to last BM assessment without confirmation of MDS; 0.8 months, range, 0.2-23.0). Results First, results of FC on PB were compared between pts with finally proven MDS (n=96) by BM vs. those with no MDS by BM as diagnosed during follow-up. All 34 pts with myeloid progenitor cells (MPC) by FC in PB had finally proven MDS. However, in addition 62/94 (66.0%) of those without MPC (p<0.0001) also had proven MDS. Thus, the presence of MPC in PB was at least strongly indicative of MDS while there were also cases with MDS without MPC in PB. Moreover, besides the presence of MPC in PB, 17 of these 34 cases in addition displayed an aberrant antigen expression on MPC. Focusing on granulocytes we first analyzed side-scatter (SSC) signals in granulocytes as ratio of mean SSC signals granulocytes/lymphocytes (G/L). While for BM samples a reduced SSC ratio G/L had been described which reflects hypogranulation, we indeed found similar data for PB with a significantly lower SSC ratio G/L in pts with proven MDS as compared to those without (mean±SD 5.7±1.1 vs. 6.3±1.0, p=0.015). More strict, a mean SSC ratio G/L of 3.9 was found to most specifically identify pts with MDS: all 6 cases with a ratio <3.9 had MDS. Regarding aberrant antigen expression in granulocytes, MDS was more frequently diagnosed among cases with vs. without the following features: aberrant CD11b/CD16 expression pattern (43/46 investigated, 93.5% vs. 53/82, 64.6%; p=0.0002), lack of CD10 expression (37/43, 86.0% vs. 59/85, 69.4%; p=0.052), CD56 expression (19/21, 90.5% vs. 77/107, 72.0%; p=0.098). Cumulating this data, ≥2 aberrantly expressed antigens on granulocytes were found indicative of MDS: 42/45 (93.3%) of pts with aberrant expression of ≥2 antigens had MDS while only 54/83 (65.1%) of those with 0 or 1 aberrantly expressed antigen had finally proven MDS (p=0.0003). Regarding aberrant antigen expression in monocytes, pts with the following features more frequently had MDS as compared to those without: reduced expression of HLA-DR, CD13, CD11b, or CD15, aberrant expression of CD2 or CD34 (as single makers all n.s.). However, cumulating this data also resulted in a significant relation to a diagnosis of MDS during follow-up: 31/36 (86.1%) of pts with aberrant expression of ≥2 antigens on monocytes were diagnosed MDS vs. 65/92 (70.7%) of those without (p=0.052). Integrating the data for the different cell compartments, pts were separated according to the presence of the following 4 criteria: 1) presence of MPC in PB by FC, 2) aberrant expression of ≥1 antigen in MPC in PB, 3) aberrant expression of ≥2 antigens in granulocytes in PB, and 4) aberrant expression of ≥2 antigens in monocytes in PB: 68/76 (89.5%) of pts with ≥1 of these criteria had MDS, which was the case in 28/52 (53.8%) of cases fulfilling none of these criteria (p<0.0001). Strengthening the selection to presence of ≥2 of the criteria, all such 36 cases had MDS which was true for 60/92 (65.2%) of those with ≤1 criterion (p<0.0001). Applying these criteria to the set of remaining 29 pts with MPN, MDS/MPN, or possible MDS, 17 (58.6%) of them fulfilled ≥1 criterion which was true for 8/32 (25.0%) of pts not diagnosed MDS (p=0.010). Conclusions FC reveals MDS-related findings in PB samples using a specific panel targeting 10 antigens and may be used to identify pts with a high probability of MDS. Further studies with direct comparison of PB and BM should clarify the role of PB analysis by FC in the diagnostic work-up of pts with suspected MDS. Disclosures: Kern: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schabath:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Alpermann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document