scholarly journals Effects of immersive virtual reality exposure in preparing pediatric oncology patients for radiation therapy

Author(s):  
Michelle Tennant ◽  
Nigel Anderson ◽  
George J. Youssef ◽  
Laura McMillan ◽  
Renae Thorson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 104345422097570
Author(s):  
Remziye Semerci ◽  
Melahat Akgün Kostak ◽  
Tuba Eren ◽  
Gülcan Avci

Purpose: Needle procedures are one of the most distressing practices for pediatric oncology patients. Virtual reality (VR) is a distraction method which offers an extremely realistic and interactive virtual environment and helps reduce needle-related pain and distress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of VR method on pain during venous port access in pediatric oncology patients aged 7 to 18 years. Method: Children who had cancer and were between the ages of 7 and 18 years and undergoing a port-a-cath access were randomly assigned through blocked randomization to either the VR intervention group or control group. A commercially available VR headset was fitted to children in the intervention group. Immediately after the port access, pain scores were obtained from children’s self-reports and parents’ proxy reports, using the Wong–Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Results: Descriptive characteristics of the children ( n = 71) showed a homogeneous distribution between groups. During the procedure, children in the control group ( n = 36; 5.03 ± 3.35) experienced more pain than the children in VR group ( n = 35; 2.34 ± 2.76; p < .001). Proxy reports of the parents in the experimental group (1.77 ± 2.46) were found to be lower than those in the control group (4.67 ± 2.56; p < .001). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: VR method is effective for reducing pain during venous port access in pediatric oncology patients. VR should be used as a distraction method during venous port access.


2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. e26589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avani Dholakia Rao ◽  
Qinyu Chen ◽  
Ralph P. Ermoian ◽  
Sara R. Alcorn ◽  
Maria Luisa S. Figueiredo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Wolitzky ◽  
Robyn Fivush ◽  
Elana Zimand ◽  
Larry Hodges ◽  
Barbara Olasov Rothbaum

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9537-9537
Author(s):  
I. J. Dunkel ◽  
A. Kosack ◽  
E. Riedel ◽  
T. E. Kiehn ◽  
T. N. Small ◽  
...  

9537 Background: VRE colonization and infection have emerged as an issue for pediatric oncology patients, but little is known about the long-term risks following initial VRE positivity in this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of subsequent VRE infection in colonized or infected pediatric oncology patients and to try to identify risk factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the 57 pediatric oncology patients who had a positive VRE culture at MSKCC from 1996–2000 and subsequently received chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Patients whose only subsequent treatment was allogeneic stem cell transplantation were excluded. The incidence of subsequent VRE infection was calculated using a competing risk analysis accounting for death from non-VRE causes as a competing risk. Data regarding hypothesized risk factors for subsequent VRE infections were collected. Results: Ten of the 57 patients had subsequent VRE infection, but none was the primary cause of death. The cumulative incidence of subsequent infection was 14% (7–27%, 95% confidence interval) at 1 year and 16% (9–29%, 95% confidence interval) at 2 years. Eight developed their subsequent infection within 3 months; the other 2 occurred at 15 and 30 months. A formal analysis of risk factors was not attempted due to the small number of events; however, none of the hypothesized risk factors (initial VRE colonization versus infection, number of chemotherapy or radiation therapy regimens, number of neutropenic or mucositis episodes, number of hospitalizations, number of abdominal surgeries or stem cell transplantations) appeared to differ between those who developed a subsequent infection and those who did not. Conclusions: Pediatric oncology patients with VRE colonization or initial infection are at risk for subsequent VRE infection, particularly within the first 3 months of initial diagnosis of VRE positivity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document