Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates LINE-1 expression through epigenetic mechanisms that are linked to the canonical TGF-β1 signaling pathway

2016 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
E.M. Reyes-Reyes ◽  
K.S. Ramos
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey V. Polonikov ◽  
Olga Yu. Bushueva ◽  
Irina V. Bulgakova ◽  
Maxim B. Freidin ◽  
Mikhail I. Churnosov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Hoon Pan ◽  
Jingsi Tang ◽  
Kaleigh Beane ◽  
Mersady Redding ◽  
Jiangchao Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives For decades, fructose intake has been recognized as an environmental risk for metabolic syndromes and diseases. Thus, we comprehensively examined the effects of fructose intake on mice liver transcriptomes. Methods Fructose supplemented water (34%; wt/vol) was fed to both male and female C57BL/6 N mice at their free will for six weeks, followed by hepatic transcriptomics analysis. Based on our criteria, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected and subjected to further computational analyses to predict key pathways and upstream regulator(s). Subsequently, predicted genes and pathways from the transcriptomics dataset were validated via quantitative RT-PCR analyses. Results As results, we identified 89 down-regulated and 88 up-regulated mRNAs in fructose-fed mice livers. These DEGs were subjected to bioinformatic analysis tools in which DEGs were mainly enriched in xenobiotic metabolic processes; further, in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software, it was suggested that the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is an upstream regulator governing overall changes while fructose suppresses the AhR signaling pathway. In our quantitative RT-PCR validation, we confirmed that fructose suppressed AhR signaling through modulating expressions of transcription factor (arnt) and upstream regulators (ncor2, and rb1). Conclusions Altogether, we demonstrated that ad libitum fructose intake suppresses the canonical AhR signaling pathway in C57BL/6 N mice liver. Based on our current observations, further studies are warranted, especially with regard to the effects of co-exposure to fructose on 1) other types of carcinogens and 2) inflammation inducing agents (or even diets such as a high-fat diet), to find implications of fructose induced-AhR suppression. Funding Sources This work was supported by the University of Arkansas, VPRED Start-up fund and Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences. Support has been also provided in part by the Arkansas Biosciences Institute, a partnership of scientists from Arkansas Children's Hospital, Arkansas State University, the University of Arkansas-Division of Agriculture, the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. The Arkansas Biosciences Institute is the major research component of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act of 2000. Supporting Tables, Images and/or Graphs


2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth E. Dunham ◽  
Emily A. Stevens ◽  
Edward Glover ◽  
Christopher A. Bradfield

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geonildo Rodrigo Disner ◽  
Monica Lopes-Ferreira ◽  
Carla Lima

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is an environmentally responsive ligand-activated transcription factor, identified in the ‘70s for its toxic responses to halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, such as dioxin. Recently, AhR has been recognized as engaged in multiple physiological processes in health and diseases, particularly in the immune system, inflammatory response, tumorigenesis, and cellular differentiation by epigenetic mechanisms involving miRNAs. However, there is still scarce information about AhR-dependent miRNA regulation and miRNA-mediated epigenetic control in pathologies and therapies. In this review, we explore the mutual regulation of AhR and miRNA over the last decade of studies since many miRNAs have dioxin response elements (DRE) in their 3’ UTR, as well as AhR might contain binding sites of miRNAs. TCDD is the most used ligand to investigate the impact of AhR activation, and the immune system is one of the most sensitive of its targets. An association between TCDD-activated AhR and epigenetic mechanisms like post-transcriptional regulation by miRNAs, DNA methylation, or histone modification has already been confirmed. Besides, several studies have shown that AhR-induced miR-212/132 cluster suppresses cancers, attenuates autoimmune diseases, and has an anti-inflammatory role in different immune responses by regulating cytokine levels and immune cells. Together the ever-expanding new AhR roles and the miRNA therapeutics are a prominent segment among biopharmaceuticals. Additionally, AhR-activated miRNAs can serve as valuable biomarkers of diseases, notably cancer progression or suppression and chemical exposure. Once AhR-dependent gene expression may hinge on the ligand, cell type, and context singularity, the reviewed outcomes might help contextualize state of the art and support new trends and emerging opportunities in the field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document