Seasonal variation of human physiology does not influence the harvest of peripheral blood CD34+ cells from unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 102917
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Pruszczyk ◽  
Milena Płachta ◽  
Elżbieta Urbanowska ◽  
Małgorzata Król ◽  
Maria Król ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Physiology ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Seasonal Variation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells

scholarly journals Lower Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts and Yields at Subsequent Donations Is Influenced By a Shorter Inter-Donation Interval between the First and Subsequent Mobilizations

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1962-1962
Author(s):  
Sandhya R. Panch ◽  
Brent R. Logan ◽  
Jennifer A. Sees ◽  
Bipin N. Savani ◽  
Nirali N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors are asked to donate a subsequent time to the same or different recipient. In a recent large CIBMTR study of second time donors, Stroncek et al. incidentally found that second peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections had lower total CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells per liter of whole blood processed, and CD34+ cells per kg donor weight. Based on smaller studies, the time between the two independent PBSC donations (inter-donation interval) as well as donor sex, race and baseline lymphocyte counts appear to influence CD34+ cell yields at subsequent donations. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate factors contributory to CD34+ cell yields at subsequent PBSC donation amongst NMDP donors. Methods. The study population consisted of filgrastim (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC donors through the NMDP/CIBMTR between 2006 and 2017, with a subsequent donation of the same product. evaluated the impact of inter-donation interval, donor demographics (age, BMI, race, sex, G-CSF dose, year of procedure, need for central line) and changes in complete blood counts (CBC), on the CD34+ cell yields/liter (x106/L) of blood processed at second donation and pre-apheresis (Day 5) peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts/liter (x106/L) at second donation. Linear regression was used to model log cell yields as a function of donor and collection related variables, time between donations, and changes in baseline values from first to second donation. Stepwise model building, along with interactions among significant variables were assessed. The Pearson chi-square test or the Kruskal-Wallis test compared discrete variables or continuous variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, a significance level of 0.01 was used due to the large number of variables considered. Results: Among 513 PBSC donors who subsequently donated a second PBSC product, clinically relevant decreases in values at the second donation were observed in pre-apheresis CD34+ cells (73.9 vs. 68.6; p=0.03), CD34+cells/L blood processed (32.2 vs. 30.1; p=0.06), and total final CD34+ cell count (x106) (608 vs. 556; p=0.02). Median time interval between first and second PBSC donations was 11.7 months (range: 0.3-128.1). Using the median pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts from donation 1 as the cut-off for high versus low mobilizers, we found that individuals who were likely to be high or low mobilizers at first donation were also likely to be high or low mobilizers at second donation, respectively (Table 1). This was independent of the inter-donation interval. In multivariate analyses, those with an inter-donation interval of >12 months, demonstrated higher CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors donating within a year (mean ratio 1.15, p<0.0001). Change in donor BMI was also a predictor for PBSC yields. If donor BMI decreased at second donation, so did the CD34+cells/L blood processed (0.74, p <0.0001). An average G-CSF dose above 960mcg was also associated with an increase in CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors who received less than 960mcg (1.04, p=0.005). (Table 2A). Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells on Day 5 of second donation were also affected by the inter-donation interval, with higher cell counts associated with a longer time interval (>12 months) between donations (1.23, p<0.0001). Further, independent of the inter-donation interval, GCSF doses greater than 960mcg per day associated with higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cells at second donation (1.26, p<0.0001); as was a higher baseline WBC count (>6.9) (1.3, p<0.0001) (Table 2B). Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of second time unrelated PBSC donors, a longer inter-donation interval was confirmed to be associated with better PBSC mobilization and collection. Given hematopoietic stem cell cycling times of 9-12 months in humans, where possible, repeat donors may be chosen based on these intervals to optimize PBSC yields. Changes in BMI are also to be considered while recruiting repeat donors. Some of these parameters may be improved marginally by increasing G-CSF dose within permissible limits. In most instances, however, sub-optimal mobilizers at first donation appear to donate suboptimal numbers of HSC at their subsequent donation. Disclosures Pulsipher: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Lecture; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria. Shaw:Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

scholarly journals Ex vivo expansion and maturation of peripheral blood CD34+ cells into the myeloid lineage

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1405-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Haylock ◽  
LB To ◽  
TL Dowse ◽  
CA Juttner ◽  
PJ Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Production ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Hematopoietic reconstitution (HR) after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is characterized by a delay of 8 and 12 days for recovery to safe levels of neutrophils and platelets even in patients with the most rapid engraftment. We postulate that a further enhancement in the rate of HR may be achieved by transplanting with an expanded postprogenitor cell population that can provide mature functional cells within days of infusion. In this study we investigated the ability of combinations of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF) to generate nascent granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) in a 7-day suspension culture of peripheral blood CD34+ cells. A combination of 6 HGF, ie, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage- CSF (GM-CSF), and stem cell factor (SCF), was identified as the most potent combination of those tested. Subsequently, large volume suspension cultures of CD34+ cells from the same patients using the same 6-factor combination were established and monitored for 21 days. An exponential rate of nucleated cell production (mean 1,324-fold increase) occurred during culture. CFU-GM production paralleled nucleated cell production until day 10, peaked at day 14 (mean 66-fold increase), and was then maintained until day 21. Cells produced in culture were predominantly neutrophil precursors and developed normally as assessed by morphology, immunophenotype, and superoxide generation. This stroma-free, cytokine-driven culture system can achieve a degree of amplification, which suggests the feasibility of ex vivo culture of hematopoietic progenitor cells as an adjunct to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Bortezomib Given in Sequence with Anthracycline and Thalidomide-Containing Regimens Does Not Adversely Affect Stem Cell Mobilization and Engraftment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Hanna J. Khoury ◽  
Douglas R. Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) remains the standard of care, there is considerable interest in incorporating bortezomib into the initial treatment of MM. However, the role of bortezomib in frontline therapy for MM will depend in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. We conducted a pilot study of bortezomib administered pretransplant followed by high-dose melphalan with AHSCT. Two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cell mobilization was initiated by administering filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously on consecutive days until stem cell harvest was completed. Stem cell collection began on day 5 of filgrastim via large volume apheresis (20 L/day) performed daily until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients were subsequently admitted to the hospital for high-dose melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2/day subcutaneously was administered starting day +1 post-transplant and continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. To date, 23 of a planned 40 patients have been enrolled in this study with 19 patients having completed their initial therapy with bortezomib followed by AHSCT. Patient population consists of 16 male and 7 female patients with the median age at diagnosis of 58 years (range 38–68). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (16), IgA (7) with stage II (9) or stage III (14) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 11 patients were treated with VAD (vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) or DVd (Doxil, vincristine and dexamethasone), 5 patients with thalidomide and 5 patients with both. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. All patients successfully achieved the target of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in either one (15/19 patients) or two (4/19 patients) collections with the first apheresis product containing a mean of 5.79 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Analysis of peripheral blood by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant differences in lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment with bortezomib. Following AHSCT, all patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (time to platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 12 days (range 9–30 days). Eleven patients were evaluable for response at 100 days post-transplant. Compared to pre-bortezomib paraprotein levels, 3 patients achieved a CR or near CR, 7 maintained a PR while 1 patient developed PD. We conclude that pretransplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment in patients with MM undergoing AHSCT. Updated results and detailed analysis will be available at the time of presentation.

Temporal Changes in Plerixafor Administration Do Not Impact Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization Efficacy: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2988-2988
Author(s):  
R. Donald Harvey ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Heather Renfroe ◽  
Rajni Sinha ◽  
Christopher R Flowers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Dosing Interval ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Abstract 2988 Objectives: Plerixafor (AMD3100, Mozobil) with filgrastim (G-CSF, Neupogen) is approved for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). Plerixafor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) are well described, with linear, dose-dependent PK following subcutaneous (SC) administration, peak concentrations 30–60 mins post-injection and an elimination half-life (t1/2) of 5.3 hr. In pharmacodynamic studies of plerixafor in conjunction with filgrastim in healthy volunteers, peak CD34+ cell counts occur 10–14 hours following administration, however, data is limited in the 14–24 hr timeframe. Plerixafor labeling requires SC dosing approximately 11 hours prior to apheresis, which translates into dosing 10 :00 PM the night before apheresis, and 54% of MM patients collect ≥ 6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg following a single apheresis procedure. The current regimen is inconvenient for patients and requires additional health care resources. Based on PK and PD, we hypothesized that plerixafor given at 3 :00 PM (17 hr prior to apheresis) would yield equivalent CD34+ HSC yield to 10 :00 PM dosing in MM patients. Methods: In a Simon's two-stage design, we enrolled MM patients undergoing cytokine-only HSC mobilization. All subjects received filgrastim 7.5 mcg/kg SC BID for 4 days followed by plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC daily) for up to 4 days beginning at 3 :00 PM the day prior to the first day of a 24-liter apheresis procedure at 8 :00 AM. Target CD34+ HSC collection for stem cell transplant (SCT) was ≥ 10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Blood samples for CD34+ fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis were collected prior to the first plerixafor dose and at 1, 3, and 17 ± 1 hr, then daily prior to apheresis as needed. Results: Thirty patients (17 female, median age 59 years [range 44–70]) were evaluable; 27 received 1 pre-mobilization regimen (RVD n=20, VTD n=2, VD n=2, V/PLD/D n=1, VT n=1, RD n=1) for a median of 4 (1–6) cycles. Three received 2 regimens [CMF × 6 (breast cancer), then VTD × 5; RD × 4, then RVD × 4; and V/PLD × 1 with maintenance R]. Six patients received prior radiation. Mean (± SD) CD34+ cell counts in peripheral blood pre-plerixafor and 1, 3, and 17 hr post-first dose increased through the dosing interval (Figure). Twenty-two (73%) patients collected target cell numbers in 1 day of apheresis, 7 (23%) in 2 days, and 1 (3%) in 3 days. Twenty-seven (90%) patients collected ≥ 6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 1 day. Institutional data with filgrastim 7.5 mcg/kg SC BID for 4 days alone in MM in 22 subjects showed a day 1 collection of ≥ 10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 18% of patients (Renfroe H, et al. Transfusion Feb 2011). Adverse events were generally mild and consistent with known side effects of the combination [gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhea, nausea) and injection site reactions]. To date, 16 (53%) patients have proceeded to autologous SCT with melphalan conditioning and all patients have engrafted, with median time to an ANC ≥ 500/mm3 of 13 (range 11–15) days and platelets ≥ 20, 000/mm3 of 16 (range 11–21) days. Conclusion: This is the first prospective trial demonstrating the safety and efficacy of plerixafor given 17 hr prior to apheresis. Pharmacodynamic data showed the peripheral blood CD34+ cell population increased throughout the dosing interval, with a 4.6-fold increase over pre-plerixafor counts at 17 hr. Comparison with historical institutional controls and published data suggests this regimen yields at least equivalent, if not superior, collection rates with one apheresis procedure. Disclosures: Flowers: Genentech/Roche (unpaid): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bortezomib in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2067-2067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhausaheb Bagal ◽  
Anant Gokarn ◽  
Avinash Bonda ◽  
Swapnil Chavan ◽  
Sachin Punatar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Harvest

Abstract Background: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) have become integral part of front-line treatment of multiple myeloma. Murine model experiments have shown mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood after PI administration via down regulation of very late antigen 4 (VLA-4) which mediate adherence of hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow microenvironment via interaction with vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1). Human studies with bortezomib in combination with G-CSF for mobilization have yielded encouraging results with no additional toxicity and no malignant plasma cell mobilization was observed. Cyclophosphamide based chemo-mobilization offers advantage in term of higher stem cell yield and is able to overcome adverse impact of prior lenalidomide therapy on stem cell harvest. In the current study we added bortezomib to cyclophosphamide-GCSF (B-Cy-GCSF) chemo-mobilization regimen to study the effect of bortezomib on stem cell harvest and compared this with our earlier protocol of only cyclophosphamide-GCSF (Cy-GCSF) mobilization. Methods: Patients of multiple myeloma aged between 18 to 70 years were eligible for the study in the period between March 2016- June 2018. Patients after induction therapy achieving at least partial response and having no more than grade 1 peripheral neuropathy were enrolled. Patients received bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8 and 11 and cyclophosphamide (Cy) was administered at a dose of 1 g/m2 on day 8 and 9 followed by G-CSF 10µg/kg in two divided doses from day 11 onwards till target stem cell collection of at least 5 X 106/Kg. The peripheral blood CD34 (PB CD34) counts were monitored from day 14 and harvest was initiated when it reached above 20 cells/µL. The peak PB CD34 count achieved, the number of days of harvest required, the CD34 dose yield and the engraftment kinetics were recorded and compared with earlier patients who had undergone Cy-GCSF chemo-mobilization. These patients had received Cy 1 g/m2 on d1 and d2, G-CSF 10 mcg/kg from d4 onwards and PBCD34 monitored from d7 onwards. Result: A total of 37 patients were enrolled between March 2016 and June 2018. Median age of study cohort was 46 years (range 27-63) and 27 (73 %) were males. Median lines of therapy received were 1 (range 1 to 2) and 8 (21.6 %) had received lenalidomide prior to stem cell harvest. The median peak peripheral blood CD34 cell counts 71.3 cells /µL (range 27.5 -306). Median CD34 cells collected were 9.21 X 106 /Kg (range 4.95-17.1). Target CD34 cell collection was achieved after a median of one day harvest (range 1-2). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11.5 and 13.5 days respectively. These results were compared with 88 patients who had undergone Cy-GCSF chemo-mobilization earlier at our center from May 2008 till February 2016 as seen in Table1 . In Cy- G-CSF cohort, median number of harvest required for target CD34 was 2 (range 1-4) and median CD34 cell yield was 8.2 X 106/Kg (0.4-24.2). Target CD34 cells yield of 5 X 106/Kg was achieved with single apheresis in 58.6% of patients after B-Cy-GCSF mobilization as compared to 44.3% in Cy-G-CSF group, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.1). While 3(3.4 %) had failed chemo-mobilization after Cy-GCSF, none of patients in bortezomib group had mobilization failure. Conclusion: Patients undergoing B-Cy-GCSF mobilization have higher stem cell yield and required less days of harvest. This strategy should be explored in a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Ex vivo expansion and maturation of peripheral blood CD34+ cells into the myeloid lineage

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1405-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Haylock ◽  
LB To ◽  
TL Dowse ◽  
CA Juttner ◽  
PJ Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Production ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Hematopoietic reconstitution (HR) after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is characterized by a delay of 8 and 12 days for recovery to safe levels of neutrophils and platelets even in patients with the most rapid engraftment. We postulate that a further enhancement in the rate of HR may be achieved by transplanting with an expanded postprogenitor cell population that can provide mature functional cells within days of infusion. In this study we investigated the ability of combinations of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF) to generate nascent granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) in a 7-day suspension culture of peripheral blood CD34+ cells. A combination of 6 HGF, ie, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage- CSF (GM-CSF), and stem cell factor (SCF), was identified as the most potent combination of those tested. Subsequently, large volume suspension cultures of CD34+ cells from the same patients using the same 6-factor combination were established and monitored for 21 days. An exponential rate of nucleated cell production (mean 1,324-fold increase) occurred during culture. CFU-GM production paralleled nucleated cell production until day 10, peaked at day 14 (mean 66-fold increase), and was then maintained until day 21. Cells produced in culture were predominantly neutrophil precursors and developed normally as assessed by morphology, immunophenotype, and superoxide generation. This stroma-free, cytokine-driven culture system can achieve a degree of amplification, which suggests the feasibility of ex vivo culture of hematopoietic progenitor cells as an adjunct to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Higher Efficacy of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Children Mobilized with High-Dose G-CSF.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5274-5274
Author(s):  
Jan Styczynski ◽  
Robert Debski ◽  
Hanna Gornicka ◽  
Elzbieta Hulek ◽  
Pawel Wojtylak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Group I ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Collection ◽  
Number Of Cells

Abstract Objective: Analysis of efficacy of PBSC collection after mobilization by high-dose G-CSF in children and young adults, qualified for transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells. Patients and Methods: Total number of 21 patients (23 collection cycles) were included into the study, divided into 2 groups: group I of 10 patients (aged 16m-23y, weight 8.5–61kg) with solid tumors were mobilized with G-CSF (Neupogen) at dose 2x5 μg/kg bw/day (12 collection cycles); group II of 11 patients (aged 3–27y, weight 12.5–68kg) with solid tumors (n=6) or hematological malignancies (n=5), who were mobilized with G-CSF (Neupogen) at dose 2x12 μg/kg bw/day. PBSC collections were performed by COBE Spectra from the day when CD34 cell count exceeded 20/μl. Efficacy of procedure was determined by collection of total 2x106 CD34 cells/kg (minimal required cell dose), or 5x106 CD34 cells/kg (optimal cell dose). Results: Group I: Peripheral blood CD34 cell count exceeded 20/μl in 7/12 (58%) patients at day 4 and 10/12 (83%) at day 6 of G-CSF administration. Total number of CD34 cells of 2x106 /kg kw and 5x106 /kg bw was obtained in 3/12 (25%) and 2/12 (17%) patients after first collection respectively; and in 8/12 (67%) and 4/12 (33%) after second collection, respectively. After 3 days of collection required number of cells was obtained in 9/12 (75%) and 6/12 (50%) patients, respectively. No patient reported side-effects related to G-CSF administration. Group II: Peripheral blood CD34 cell count exceeded 20/μl in 8/11 (73%) patients at day 4 and 11/11 at day 6 of G-CSF administration. Total number of CD34 cells of 2x106 /kg bw and 5x106 /kg bw was obtained in 9/11 (82%) and 3/11 (27%) patients after first collection respectively; and in 11/11 and 6/11 (55%) after second collection, respectively. After 3 days of collection, in all patients, but one, optimal number of cells was obtained. Two patients reported side-effects related to G-CSF administration (headache, bone pain). No differences were found between the rate of speed of PBSC mobilization in analyzed schemes of G-CSF administration, however group of patients mobilized with high-dose G-CSF, showed more efficient stem cell collection after 3 days of procedure (p=0.027; OR=14; 95%CI=1.1–402). Conclusion: Mobilization of PBSC with high-dose G-CSF is a safe and effective method of hematopoietic stem cell collection, enabling high efficacy of this procedure.

scholarly journals Stem Cell Mobilization Using Parathyroid Hormone Analog: A Single Institutional Review

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Okechukwu Nwogbo ◽  
Thuy Le ◽  
James Shikle ◽  
Juan Cintron Garcia ◽  
Sheila Tinsley
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection ◽  
Poor Mobilizers

Objective: Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization increases the release of immature and maturing hematopoietic cells from the marrow into the blood circulation. For successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation an adequate number of stem cells must be mobilized and collected. For autologous stem cell transplants, a product bag CD34+ count of &gt; 5.0 x 106 CD34/kg is a target; however, patients have been successfully transplanted with doses as low as 2.0 x 106 CD34/kg. Some patients are "poor mobilizers" and standard protocols do not result in adequate numbers of circulating CD34 cells to collect. Risk factors associated with poor stem cell mobilization include increasing age, underlying diagnosis, low premobilization platelet count, history of increasing cycles, and regimens of chemotherapy. Teriparatide, a parathyroid hormone (PTH) analog has been used in "poor mobilizers." Two patients at our institution received the drug as part of an additional mobilization strategy. Method: Medical records of patients who had stem cell mobilization were reviewed. Two patients who failed routine mobilization protocol received PTH as part of an additional mobilization regimen. Clinical outcomes, collection, and engraftment data were reviewed. Result: Patient 1 had a diagnosis of Hodgkin Lymphoma and failed to mobilize adequately on the first attempt using filgrastim and plerixafor with peripheral blood CD34 counts of 1, 4, and 3 resulting in cancellation of stem cell collection. For the second mobilization attempt, teriparatide was added to the regimen. Peripheral blood CD34 counts improved to 8, 6, and 2 resulting in three collections with a total of 2.23 x 106 CD34/kg for reinfusion. Engraftment data showed 14 days for neutrophils and 17 days for platelets. The patient is 6 months post-transplant with no major morbidities reported, currently in maintenance therapy, and has not recurred. Patient 2 had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and failed to mobilize on filgrastim and plerixafor with peripheral blood CD34 counts of 2, 2, and 2 resulting in collections with a total of 0.6 x 106 CD34/kg for reinfusion. For the second mobilization attempt, peripheral blood CD34 counts of 2, 2, 2, and 0 resulting in collections with a total of 0.822 x 106 CD34/kg for reinfusion. For the third mobilization attempt, teriparatide was added to the regimen. Peripheral blood CD34 counts improved to 8 and 4 resulting in collections with a total of 1.8 x 106 CD34/kg for reinfusion. Patient expired one month after collection without reinfusion. Conclusion: Two patients who failed standard mobilization for stem cell collection at our institution received teriparatide as part of an additional stem cell mobilization regimen. Adequate doses of stem cell products for transplant were collected. One patient was reinfused and subsequently engrafted appropriately. Teriparatide can be used in the setting of poor mobilization. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

An Effective Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization Algorithm for Adding Plerixafor to G-CSF for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4389-4389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin LaPorte ◽  
Scott R. Solomon ◽  
Asad Bashey ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
Lawrence E. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
The Absolute

Abstract Abstract 4389 Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become an integral part of the treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). In addition, it is standard practice to collect enough stem cells for more than one transplant. Therefore, it is critical to have an effective mobilization strategy in order to efficiently collect sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells. Administering granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone to MM patients can produce sufficient CD34+ yields in the majority of patients. However, some patients may require > 4 apheresis days to achieve those yields. In addition, some patients may fail to collect enough CD34+ cells for ASCT. Plerixafor was approved in 2008 to be used in combination with G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood. Plerixafor can increase the average daily CD34+ yields by 3-fold. However, since the majority of patients can collect with G-CSF alone, a plerixafor algorithm was developed in 2009 to judiciously administer plerixafor only to those patients at higher perceived risk for mobilization failure. Administration of plerixafor is based on a peripheral blood CD34+ count drawn after 3 days of G-CSF and subsequent CD34+ collection yields. Methods: G-CSF 10mcg/kg/day (given daily or divided into twice daily) was administered subcutaneously from day 1 to 4. On day 4, a peripheral absolute CD34+ cell count was drawn. If the absolute CD34+ cell count was ≥ 12 cells/mm3 then apheresis started on day 5. If the absolute CD34+ cell count on day 4 was < 12 cells/mm3 plerixafor 240mcg/kg was administered subcutaneously the evening prior to apheresis beginning on day 5. During apheresis, if the CD34+ yield was < 1.0×106 CD34+/kg or 50% less than the previous collection, plerixafor was initiated. The minimum collection yield for all patients was 4.0×106 CD34+/kg. The maximum number of apheresis days was 5. Previous therapy was also examined. Results: From October 2009 to May 2011, 68 multiple myeloma patients were mobilized with G-CSF +/− plerixafor. Ninety-three percent (63/68) of patients achieved the minimum collection yield of 4.0×106 CD34+/kg. Ninety-nine percent (67/68) of patients achieved a yield of at least 2.0×106 CD34+/kg. Forty-four percent (30/68) of the patients required at least 1 dose of plerixafor with the majority requiring it prior to the first apheresis (83%). The median days of apheresis was 2 (range 1–5). The overall average yield on the first apheresis day was 4.35×106 CD34+/kg (95% CI +/− 0.64). The overall average total yield was 8.71×106 CD34+/kg (95% CI +/− 0.93). Sixty percent (41/68) and 76% (52/68) of patients collected ≥ 6.0×106 CD34+/kg in ≤ 2 days and ≤ 4 days of apheresis, respectively. The average daily yield (ACD34) for G-CSF alone can be predicted by ACD34 = 0.0377+ 0.07456xCD34 (see figure). ACD34 after plerixafor + G-CSF can be predicted by the equation 3(0.0377 + 0.07456xCD34) = ACD34. Of the patients that received previous radiation therapy (9) or cyclophosphamide (2), plerixafor was utilized in 78% and 100%, respectively. Previous lenalidomide therapy was present in 50% of the patients and it did not correlate to any increase in plerixafor usage. Conclusion: Adding plerixafor to G-CSF based upon a day 4 CD34+ count and collection yields is an effective strategy to mobilize CD34+ cells. Ninety-three percent of the of the patients were able to collect a minimum of 4.0×106 CD34+/kg cells and 99% collected > 2.0×106 CD34+/kg, in a median of two collections. Limitations to the study include a small sample size and an arbitrarily determined threshold to administer plerixafor. Also, the length of lenalidomide could not be retrospectively determined. A cost-based analysis is currently being performed to help determine the best day 4 CD34 cutoff for future studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document