Kidney Donor Risk Index as the Predictor for the Short-term Clinical Outcomes After Kidney Transplant From Deceased Donor With Acute Kidney Injury

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jun ◽  
C.W. Jung ◽  
S. Lim ◽  
M.G. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Kidney Donor ◽  
Short Term

scholarly journals Impact of deceased donor with acute kidney injury on subsequent kidney transplant outcomes–an ANZDATA registry analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0249000
Author(s):  
Juan Pei ◽  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
Yong Pey See ◽  
Elaine M. Pascoe ◽  
Andrea K. Viecelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Hazard Ratio

Background The need for kidney transplantation drives efforts to expand organ donation. The decision to accept organs from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) can result in a clinical dilemma in the context of conflicting reports from published literature. Material and methods This observational study included all deceased donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand between 1997 and 2017. The association of donor-AKI, defined according to KDIGO criteria, with all-cause graft failure was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death, delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection. Results The study included 10,101 recipients of kidneys from 5,774 deceased donors, of whom 1182 (12%) recipients received kidneys from 662 (11%) donors with AKI. There were 3,259 (32%) all-cause graft failures, which included 1,509 deaths with functioning graft. After adjustment for donor, recipient and transplant characteristics, donor AKI was not associated with all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.26), death-censored graft failure (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.92–1.28), death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98–1.35) or graft failure when death was evaluated as a competing event (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.26). Donor AKI was not associated with acute rejection but was associated with DGF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% CI 1.92–2.68). Conclusion Donor AKI stage was not associated with any kidney transplant outcome, except DGF. Use of kidneys with AKI for transplantation appears to be justified.

scholarly journals Adverse clinical outcomes associated with RAAS inhibitor discontinuation: analysis of over 400 000 patients from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby J L Humphrey ◽  
Glen James ◽  
Eric T Wittbrodt ◽  
Donna Zarzuela ◽  
Thomas F Hiemstra
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
First Occurrence ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Users of guideline-recommended renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may experience disruptions to their treatment, e.g. due to hyperkalaemia, hypotension or acute kidney injury. The risks associated with treatment disruption have not been comprehensively assessed; therefore, we evaluated the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in RAAS inhibitor users experiencing treatment disruptions in a large population-wide database. Methods This exploratory, retrospective analysis utilized data from the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics and the Office for National Statistics databases. Adults (≥18 years) with first RAAS inhibitor use (defined as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Time to the first occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes [all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, cardiac arrest, advancement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and acute kidney injury] was compared between RAAS inhibitor users with and without interruptions or cessations to treatment during follow-up. Associations between baseline characteristics and adverse clinical outcomes were also assessed. Results Among 434 027 RAAS inhibitor users, the risk of the first occurrence of all clinical outcomes, except advancement in CKD stage, was 8–75% lower in patients without interruptions or cessations versus patients with interruptions/cessations. Baseline characteristics independently associated with increased risk of clinical outcomes included increasing age, smoking, CKD, diabetes and heart failure. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for effective management of factors associated with RAAS inhibitor interruptions or cessations in patients for whom guideline-recommended RAAS inhibitor treatment is indicated.

scholarly journals First Reported Case in Romania of a Successfully Treated Severe COVID-19 in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Focus on Acute Kidney Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179
Author(s):  
Flaviu Tosa ◽  
Roxana Manaila ◽  
Alina Elec ◽  
Tudor Moisoiu ◽  
Liviu Ghervan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Transplant Recipient ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipient ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Kidney Graft ◽  
Kidney Involvement

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel virus SARS-CoV-2 is expanding worldwide, kidney involvement seems to be part of the spectrum of its effects. Moreover, the prognosis of the disease seems to be worse in immunocompromised patients when compared to the general population, with 4–5 times higher mortality rates. However, the overall impact on long-term function of the kidney graft is unknown. We report on a case of a 46-year-old kidney transplant recipient who was successfully treated for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The clinical course was complicated by transient acute kidney injury, most likely due to tubulo-interstitial involvement, with return to the baseline of the creatinine level by the time of discharge. We discuss the characteristics and differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury, as well as management of immunosuppression in connection with overall clinical status and evolution of kidney function. The case is illustrative for dilemmas that transplant professionals may face in the absence of evidence-based, efficient COVID-19 therapy. The risk-benefit balance of the yet to be approved treatment strategies may be weighed differently in organ transplant recipients owing to their immunocompromised status and potential drug interactions with immunosuppressive therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document