scholarly journals Non-invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis with ElastPQ: Comparison with Transient Elastography and Serologic Fibrosis Marker Tests, and Correlation with Liver Pathology Results

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2515-2521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Eun Lee ◽  
Kyung Sook Shin ◽  
June-Sik Cho ◽  
Sun Kyoung You ◽  
Ji Hye Min ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Soňa Franková ◽  
Jan Šperl

Portal hypertension represents a wide spectrum of complications of chronic liver diseases and may present by ascites, oesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndrome or portopulmonary hypertension. Portal hypertension and its severity predicts the patient‘s prognosis: as an invasive technique, the portosystemic gradient (HPVG – hepatic venous pressure gradient) measurement by hepatic veins catheterisation has remained the gold standard of its assessment. A reliable, non-invasive method to assess the severity of portal hypertension is of paramount importance; the patients with clinically significant portal hypertension have a high risk of variceal bleeding and higher mortality. Recently, non-invasive methods enabling the assessment of liver stiffness have been introduced into clinical practice in hepatology. Not only may these methods substitute for liver biopsy, but they may also be used to assess the degree of liver fibrosis and predict the severity of portal hypertension. Nowadays, we can use the quantitative elastography (transient elastography, point shear-wave elastrography, 2D-shear-wave elastography) or magnetic resonance imaging. We may also assess the severity of portal hypertension based on the non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis (i.e. ELF test) or estimate clinically signifi cant portal hypertension using composite scores (LSPS – liver spleen stiff ness score), based on liver stiffness value, spleen diameter and platelet count. Spleen stiffness measurement is a new method that needs further prospective studies. The review describes current possibilities of the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension and its severity.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Abdelaaty Abdelkader ◽  
Amira Mahmoud AlBalakosy ◽  
Ahmed Fouad Helmy Sherief ◽  
Mohamed Soliman Gado

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects approximately 170 million people worldwide, causing liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and leading to liver transplantation and ultimately death. Accurate evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases is crucial, as liver fibrosis is important in order to make therapeutic decisions, determine prognosis of liver disease and to follow-up disease progression. Multiple non-invasive methods have been used successfully in the prediction of fibrosis; however, early changes in noninvasive biomarkers of hepatic fibrosis under effective antiviral therapy are widely unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes of transient elastography values as well as FIB-4 and AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) in patients treated with DAAs. Objectives The aim beyond this study is to evaluate the changes in liver stiffness in hepatitis C Egyptian patients before and at least one year after treatment with DAAs using transient elastography and non-invasive liver fibrosis indices as FIB-4 and APRI scores. Patients and methods The present study was conducted on 100 patients with chronic hepatitis C patients attended to Ain Shams University Hospitals, Viral hepatitis treatment unit between October 2017 and December 2018, who were followed-up during treatment and after treatment for at least one year (retrospective and prospective study). Total number of cases during the study period was 117 patients. 17 patients were excluded from the study due to missed follow-up. Eventually, 100 patients were enrolled in the study fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Results The mean age of our patients is 47.9 years with Male predominance (52 males and 48 females). There was a significant improvement of, platelets counts, ALT and AST levels, which in turn cause significant improvement in FIB-4 and APRI scores. There was a significant improvement of liver stiffness after end of treatment, regardless of the DAA regimen used, as evidenced by Fibroscan. Conclusion Fibrosis regression –assessed by non-invasive markers of fibrosis is achievable upon removal of the causative agent.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. e115-e116
Author(s):  
Luis Téllez ◽  
Payance Audrey ◽  
Valérie Paradis ◽  
Enrique Rodríguez-Santiago ◽  
Aurélie Plessier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin Kazankov ◽  
Chiara Rosso ◽  
Ramy Younes ◽  
Angelo Armandi ◽  
Hannes Hagström ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Non-invasive fibrosis staging is essential in metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Transient elastography (TE) is a well-established method for liver fibrosis assessment. We have previously shown that the macrophage marker sCD163 is an independent predictor for fibrosis in MAFLD. In the present study we tested whether the combination of macrophage markers and TE improves fibrosis prediction.Methods: We measured macrophage markers soluble (s)CD163 and mannose receptor (sMR) in two independent cohorts from Italy (n = 141) and Sweden (n = 70) with biopsy-proven MAFLD and available TE.Results: In the Italian cohort, TE and sCD163 showed similar moderate associations with liver fibrosis (rho = 0.56, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively). TE had an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC, with 95% CI) for fibrosis; F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72–0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.81 (0.73–0.89), F4 = 0.95 (0.90–1.0). sCD163 also predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.71 (0.63–0.80), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.74–0.90), F4 = 0.89 (0.76–1.0)]. However, combining sCD163 and TE did not improve the AUROCs significantly [F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72–0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.85 (0.78–0.92), F4 = 0.97 (0.93–1.0)]. In the Swedish cohort, TE showed a closer association with fibrosis (rho = 0.73, p < 0.001) than sCD163 (rho = 0.43, p < 0.001) and sMR (rho = 0.46, p < 0.001). TE predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.88 (0.80–0.97), F ≥ 3 = 0.90 (0.83–0.97), F4 = 0.87 (0.78–0.96)], whereas sCD163 did not (best AUROC 0.75). sMR showed a better prediction [F ≥ 2 = 0.68 (0.56–0.81), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.71–0.92), F4 = 0.79 (0.66–0.93)], but the addition of sMR did not further improve the prediction of fibrosis by TE.Conclusion: In these cohorts of MAFLD patients, TE was superior to macrophage markers for fibrosis prediction and in contrast to our hypothesis the addition of these markers to TE did not improve its predictive capability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Dai Kwon ◽  
Kyung Ok Ko ◽  
Jae Woo Lim ◽  
Eun Jung Cheon ◽  
Young Hwa Song ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. A121
Author(s):  
V. Di Marco ◽  
F. Bronte ◽  
D. Cabibi ◽  
V. Calvaruso ◽  
Z. Borsellino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document