Safety evaluation of enzalutamide dose-escalation strategy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

209 Background: Treatment with abiraterone acetate (abi) increases the survival of men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Resistance to abi invariably occurs, probably due in part to up-regulation of steroidogenic enzymes and/or other mechanisms that sustain the synthesis of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), which raises the possibility of reversing resistance by concomitant inhibition of other required steroidogenic enzymes. The 1000 mg daily abi dose was selected for the phase III trials despite the absence of dose-limiting toxicities at higher doses. Based on the 3β-hydroxyl, Δ5-structure, we hypothesized that abi also inhibits 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase (3βHSD), which is absolutely required for the intratumoral synthesis of DHT in CRPC, regardless of origins or routes of synthesis. Methods: We tested if abi inhibits recombinant 3βHSD2 activity in vitro or endogenous 3βHSD activity in LNCaP and LAPC4 cells, including conversion of [3H]-dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to androstenedione (AD), androgen receptor (AR) nuclear translocation, expression of AR-responsive genes, and LAPC4 xenograft growth in orchiectomized mice supplemented with DHEA. Results: Abi has a mixed inhibition pattern of 3βHSD2 in vitro, blocks the conversion from DHEA to AD and DHT with an IC50 of < 1 µM in CRPC cell lines, inhibits AR nuclear translocation and expression of TMPRSS2, and decreases CRPC xenograft growth in DHEA-supplemented mice. Conclusions: Abi blocks 3βHSD enzymatic activity, synthesis of AD and DHT, inhibits the AR-response, and suppresses growth of CRPC cells at concentrations that are clinically achievable. Variable abi inhibition of 3βHSD might account in part for the heterogeneous clinical response to abi. More importantly, 3βHSD inhibition with abi might be clinically harnessed to reverse resistance to CYP17A1 inhibition at the standard dose by dose-escalation, or simply by administration with food to increase drug exposure.

Download Full-text

First-in-human, phase I study of PF-06753512, a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen (PrCa VBIR), in biochemical relapse (BCR) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2612 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2612-2612

Author(s):

Karen A. Autio ◽

Celestia S. Higano ◽

Luke T. Nordquist ◽

Leonard Joseph Appleman ◽

Tian Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Therapeutic Vaccines ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Viral Particles ◽

Group 3

2612 Background: Therapeutic vaccines targeting PC-associated antigens represent attractive approaches in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Safety/antitumor activity of PF-06753512 (PrCa VBIR) was evaluated in a phase I, dose-escalation and expansion study in patients (pts) with BCR prior to ADT and in pts with mCRPC either prior to or after failure of novel hormone therapy. PrCa VBIR consists of: 1) priming immunization with a replication-deficient adenoviral vector (AdC68) expressing PSA, prostate-specific membrane antigen and prostate stem cell antigen; 2) boosts with plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding the same antigens by IM electroporation; 3) ICI given subcutaneously, including anti CTLA-4 antibody tremelimumab (TRM) and anti PD-1 antibody sasanlimab (SSL). Methods: AdC68 ± ICI(s) were given on months (mos) 1 and 5 and pDNA ± ICI(s) on mos 2–4 and 6–8. After 8 mos, maintenance pDNA + ICI(s) were given every 1 or 2 mos. In Part A (6 escalation cohorts), pts with mCRPC received AdC68 (4 or 6x10e11 viral particles) + pDNA 5 mg ± ICIs (TRM alone 80 mg; TRM 40 or 80 mg + SSL 130 or 300 mg). In Part B (3 expansion cohorts), pts with mCRPC received AdC68 6x10e11 + pDNA 5 mg + TRM 80 mg + SSL 300 mg; pts with BCR received similar vector and pDNA + TRM 80 mg ± SSL 130 mg. Primary objectives: Assess overall safety (CTCAE v4.03), determine expansion dose. Secondary objectives: Anti-tumor activity (RECIST v1.1, Prostate Cancer Working Group 3, PSA 50 response) and immune response. (Note: Database remains open, some queries pending). Results: As of Sept 15, 2020, 91 pts were treated in dose-escalation (n=38) and expansion (n=53; BCR=35, mCRPC=18). Immune responses (ELISpot) were positive in some pts. Grade (G) 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) developed in 38.5% (35/91) of pts. G5 TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (n=1 G4 myasthenia gravis + G5 pulmonary embolism; n=1 G5 myocarditis). irAEs were more frequent in BCR compared to mCRPC. See the table for efficacy data. Conclusions: Vaccination with PrCa VBIR had a manageable safety profile. TRAEs increased when 2 ICIs were given. Some pts with BCR experienced durable PSA-50 responses without ADT; patients with mCRPC had few objective tumor responses, but had prolonged median rPFS. PrCa VBIR appears to stimulate antigen-specific immunity and results in noticeable antitumor activity, particularly in androgen sensitive disease. Clinical trial information: NCT02616185. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text