DNA and low titer, helper-free, recombinant AAV prime-boost vaccination for cytomegalovirus induces an immune response to CMV-pp65 and CMV-IE1 in transgenic HLA A*0201 mice

Vaccine ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghislaine Gallez-Hawkins ◽  
Xiuli Li ◽  
Anne E. Franck ◽  
Lia Thao ◽  
Simon F. Lacey ◽  
...  
Vaccine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (31-32) ◽  
pp. 5852-5861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Tssann Liu ◽  
Wei-Ting Lin ◽  
Chung-Chin Tsai ◽  
Chuan-Chang Chuang ◽  
Chin-Len Liao ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (15) ◽  
pp. 1661-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Davis ◽  
Bror Morein ◽  
Lennart Åkerblom ◽  
Karin Lövgren-Bengtsson ◽  
Mariëlle E. van Gils ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (9) ◽  
pp. 4391-4398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Palmowski ◽  
Ed Man-Lik Choi ◽  
Ian F. Hermans ◽  
Sarah C. Gilbert ◽  
Ji-Li Chen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongqing Gu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Youjun Mi ◽  
Xueli Gong ◽  
Tao Luo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Marín-López ◽  
Eva Calvo-Pinilla ◽  
Diego Barriales ◽  
Gema Lorenzo ◽  
Javier Benavente ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-514
Author(s):  
A.-P. S. Shurygina ◽  
N. V. Zabolotnykh ◽  
T. I. Vinogradova ◽  
K. A. Vasilyev ◽  
Zh. V. Buzitskaya ◽  
...  

Improving specific prevention of tuberculosis continues to be a top priority in phthisiology. “Prime-boost” vaccination schemes aim to maintain adequate levels of specific immunity while forming long-term protection. They are based on sequential use of BCG vaccine and new vaccine candidates expressing protective mycobacterial proteins. The development of new tuberculosis prevention approaches requires an understanding of how the anti-tuberculosis immune response forms and which mechanisms provide TB protection. Since tuberculosis is an airborne infection, vaccine effectiveness largely depends on mucosal immunity based on the formation of long-lived, functionally-active memory T-lymphocytes in the respiratory tract. We have previously shown that the influenza vector expressing ESAT-6 and Ag85A mycobacterial proteins (Flu/ESAT-6_Ag85A) in vaccination scheme of intranasal boost immunization resulted in significant increase of BCG's protective effect according to key indicators aggregate data in experimental tuberculosis infection. The aim of this work was to study the effect of intranasal immunization with the Flu/ESAT-6_Ag85A influenza vector on the formation of antigen-specific central and effector memory T cells and the cytokine-producing activity of effector T cells (TEM) in BCG standard and “BCG prime — influenza vector boost” vaccination schemes in mice. Intranasal immunization with the influenza vector has been shown to increase the proportion of antigen-specific CD4+ central memory T cells (TCM) in the pool of activated lymphocytes of lung and spleen reaching significant differences from the BCG group in the percentage of spleen CD4+ TCM (p < 0.01). In contrast to BCG, vaccination with the studied vaccine candidate was accompanied by accumulation of highly differentiated CD8 effector cells in lung, the target organ during tuberculosis infection. Comparative evaluation of the cell-mediated, post-vaccine immune response after immunization with influenzavector-based vaccine candidate (intranasal/mucosal) or BCG vaccine (subcutaneous) showed advantages in the mucosal group: in formation of functionally active subpopulations of effector CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes (CD44highCD62Llow) in lungs secreting IL-2 as well as polyfunctional cells capable of coproducing two cytokines (IFNγ/TNFα or IFNγ/IL-2) or three cytokines (IFNγ/TNFα/IL-2). Due to their more pronounced effector function, polyfunctional T-lymphocytes can be considered to be potential immunological markers of protective immunity in tuberculosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Palgen ◽  
Nicolas Tchitchek ◽  
Jamila Elhmouzi-Younes ◽  
Simon Delandre ◽  
Inana Namet ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3206-3206
Author(s):  
Michael Hahn ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Brunhilde Schweiger ◽  
Cathrin Hollenbach ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immune response to viruses in patients with multiple myeloma can be hampered by both the disease and its treatment with chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. H1N1 or seasonal influenza in myeloma patients is often characterized by severe complications. Influenza vaccination is therefore generally recommended for these patients. Nevertheless, there is evidence that in these patients, the immune response to vaccination is frequently insufficient. Preliminary data suggest that the immune response may be increased by a boost vaccination. Methods Vaccination with a triple-antigen (H1N1, A, B) influenza vaccine (Optaflu(R) from Novartis Ltd.) was administered to patients with confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma at our outpatient clinic during the season 2012/13. Humoral response monitoring was performed employing hemagglutination inhibition assays. Titers above 40 U/l were considered as protective against the respective virus strain. Based on published data from smaller cohorts, patients not mounting sufficient immune responses to the first vaccination, but clinically well tolerating the vaccine, were offered a second vaccine. Blood samples were taken prior to immunization and four weeks after each vaccination for titer analysis. Results Forty-eight myeloma patients were vaccinated. None of them showed protective immunity against all of the three antigens Influenza H1N1, A and B before vaccination. Before the seasonal vaccination 2012/13 only 18% (9/48) of the patients had protective titers against H1N1, 10% (5/48) against A and 10% (5/48) against B. After the first vaccination a protective titer against all three antigens was achieved in 14% (7/48) of the patients, in 41% (20/48) against H1N1, in 33% (16/48) against A and 20% (10/48) against B. Twenty-five patients received a second vaccine. After this boost vaccination 33% (8/25) of the patients had protective immunity against all three antigens, 75% (18/25) against H1N1, 58% (14/25) against A and 46% (11/25) against B. Conclusions Antibody protection against influenza virus is extremely poor in myeloma patients. The Federal Committee on Vaccination in Germany termed “Staendige Impfkommission (STIKO)” clearly recommends annual vaccination. In this pilot project we could demonstrate that in myeloma patients a single shot of seasonal influenza vaccine results only in 20-40% of the vaccinees in sufficient titers of neutralizing antibodies to a single antigen. The frequency of protective titers could be roughly doubled by a vaccine boost which is comparable to results reported for other groups of immunocompromised hosts like patients at hemodialysis or with HIV infection. We therefore recommend an influenza vaccine boost for myeloma patients in general. A prospective, randomized study would be highly appreciated to confirm this recommendation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document