Boost Vaccination Improves Humoral Immune Response Against Influenza Virus In Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3206-3206
Author(s):  
Michael Hahn ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Brunhilde Schweiger ◽  
Cathrin Hollenbach ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immune response to viruses in patients with multiple myeloma can be hampered by both the disease and its treatment with chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. H1N1 or seasonal influenza in myeloma patients is often characterized by severe complications. Influenza vaccination is therefore generally recommended for these patients. Nevertheless, there is evidence that in these patients, the immune response to vaccination is frequently insufficient. Preliminary data suggest that the immune response may be increased by a boost vaccination. Methods Vaccination with a triple-antigen (H1N1, A, B) influenza vaccine (Optaflu(R) from Novartis Ltd.) was administered to patients with confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma at our outpatient clinic during the season 2012/13. Humoral response monitoring was performed employing hemagglutination inhibition assays. Titers above 40 U/l were considered as protective against the respective virus strain. Based on published data from smaller cohorts, patients not mounting sufficient immune responses to the first vaccination, but clinically well tolerating the vaccine, were offered a second vaccine. Blood samples were taken prior to immunization and four weeks after each vaccination for titer analysis. Results Forty-eight myeloma patients were vaccinated. None of them showed protective immunity against all of the three antigens Influenza H1N1, A and B before vaccination. Before the seasonal vaccination 2012/13 only 18% (9/48) of the patients had protective titers against H1N1, 10% (5/48) against A and 10% (5/48) against B. After the first vaccination a protective titer against all three antigens was achieved in 14% (7/48) of the patients, in 41% (20/48) against H1N1, in 33% (16/48) against A and 20% (10/48) against B. Twenty-five patients received a second vaccine. After this boost vaccination 33% (8/25) of the patients had protective immunity against all three antigens, 75% (18/25) against H1N1, 58% (14/25) against A and 46% (11/25) against B. Conclusions Antibody protection against influenza virus is extremely poor in myeloma patients. The Federal Committee on Vaccination in Germany termed “Staendige Impfkommission (STIKO)” clearly recommends annual vaccination. In this pilot project we could demonstrate that in myeloma patients a single shot of seasonal influenza vaccine results only in 20-40% of the vaccinees in sufficient titers of neutralizing antibodies to a single antigen. The frequency of protective titers could be roughly doubled by a vaccine boost which is comparable to results reported for other groups of immunocompromised hosts like patients at hemodialysis or with HIV infection. We therefore recommend an influenza vaccine boost for myeloma patients in general. A prospective, randomized study would be highly appreciated to confirm this recommendation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moacyr Silva ◽  
Atul Humar ◽  
A. M. James Shapiro ◽  
Peter Senior ◽  
Katja Hoschler ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 444-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazia Tadount ◽  
Pamela Doyon-Plourde ◽  
Ellen Rafferty ◽  
Shannon MacDonald ◽  
Manish Sadarangani ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1401-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Huijskens ◽  
John Rossen ◽  
Paul Mulder ◽  
Ruud van Beek ◽  
Hennie van Vugt ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe emergence of a new influenza A virus (H1N1) variant in 2009 led to a worldwide vaccination program, which was prepared in a relatively short period of time. This study investigated the humoral immunity against this virus before and after vaccination with a 2009 influenza A virus (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, as well as the persistence of vaccine-induced antibodies. Our prospective longitudinal study included 498 health care workers (mean age, 43 years; median age, 44 years). Most (89%) had never or only occasionally received a seasonal influenza virus vaccine, and 11% were vaccinated annually (on average, for >10 years). Antibody titers were determined by a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay at baseline, 3 weeks after the first vaccination, and 5 weeks and 7 months after the second vaccination. Four hundred thirty-five persons received two doses of the 2009 vaccine. After the first dose, 79.5% developed a HI titer of ≥40. This percentage increased to 83.3% after the second dose. Persistent antibodies were found in 71.9% of the group that had not received annual vaccinations and in 43.8% of the group that had received annual vaccinations. The latter group tended to have lower HI titers (P=0.09). With increasing age, HI titers decreased significantly, by 2.4% per year. A single dose of the 2009 vaccine was immunogenic in almost 80% of the study population, whereas an additional dose resulted in significantly increased titers only in persons over 50. Finally, a reduced HI antibody response against the 2009 vaccine was found in adults who had previously received seasonal influenza virus vaccination. More studies on the effect of yearly seasonal influenza virus vaccination on the immune response are warranted.


Author(s):  
Yelvi Levani ◽  
Ayu Lidya Paramita

Influenza is an acute respiratory disease caused by influenza virus. Influenza can affect million people in every year and causing morbidity. Some of cases can be severe and need hospitalized, especially in elderly people. Influenza is an airborne disease and can spread rapidly. Every seasonal flu can be different because Influenza virus do mutation. Influenza vaccine can reduce morbidity and mortality. There are two types of influenza vaccine; live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) and inactivated influenza virus (IIV). The newest type of influenza vaccine consists four types of virus (quadrivalent), therefore it gives more protection compared to the older one. Influeza vaccine is still recommended during pandemic COVID-19 because it can prevent co-infection between Influenza and COVID-19. In addition, it can reduce the morbidity and mortality during pandemic COVID-19.


Author(s):  
Jiong Wang ◽  
Alexander Wiltse ◽  
Martin S. Zand

The human antibody response to influenza virus infection or vaccination is as complicated as it is essential for protection against flu. The constant antigenic changes of the virus to escape human herd immunity hinder the yearly selection of vaccine strains since it is hard to predict which virus strains will circulate for the coming flu season. A "universal" influenza vaccine that could induce broad cross-influenza subtype protection would help to alleviate this burden. However, the human antibody response is intricate and often obscure, with factors like antigenic seniority or original antigenic sin "OAS", and back-boosting ensuring that each person mounts a unique immune response to infection or vaccination with any new influenza virus strain. Notably, the effects of existing antibodies on cross-protective immunity after repeated vaccinations are unclear. More research is needed to characterize the mechanisms at play, but traditional assays such as hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) are excessively limited in scope and too resource-intensive to effectively meet this challenge. In the past ten years, new multiple dimensional assays (MDAs) have been developed to help overcome these problems by simultaneously measuring antibodies against a large panel of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) proteins with a minimal amount of sample in a high throughput way. MDAs will likely be a powerful tool for accelerating the study of the humoral immune response to influenza vaccination and the development of a universal influenza vaccine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document