scholarly journals The impact of administration of conjugate vaccines containing cross reacting material on Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody responses in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Vaccine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (34) ◽  
pp. 3986-3992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merryn Voysey ◽  
Manish Sadarangani ◽  
Elizabeth Clutterbuck ◽  
Barbara Bolgiano ◽  
Andrew J. Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B ◽  
Type B ◽  
Conjugate Vaccines ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The impact of psychosocial interventions on condom and contraceptive use in LMICs: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1182-1199
Author(s):  
Elena M. C. Riedel ◽  
David T. Turner ◽  
Loulou Hassan Kobeissi ◽  
Eirini Karyotaki ◽  
Lale Say ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Contraceptive Use ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Effect of immunity to the carrier protein on antibody responses to Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines

Vaccine ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. S46-S51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan M. Granoff ◽  
Mobeen H. Rathore ◽  
Sandra J. Holmes ◽  
Paul D. Granoff ◽  
Alexander H. Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Haemophilus Influenzae ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type ◽  
Carrier Protein ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B ◽  
Type B ◽  
Conjugate Vaccines

scholarly journals Impact of social distancing measures for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Regmi ◽  
Cho Mar Lwin
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
List Type ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIntroductionSocial distancing measures (SDMs) protect public health from the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the impact of SDMs has been inconsistent and unclear. This study aims to assess the effects of SDMs (e.g. isolation, quarantine) for reducing the transmission of COVID-19.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic review meta-analysis research of both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, COVID-19 Research and WHO database on COVID-19 for primary studies assessing the effects of SDMs (e.g. isolation, quarantine) for reducing the transmission of COVID-19, and will be reported in accordance with PRISMA statement. The PRISMA-P checklist will be used while preparing this protocol. We will use Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines (JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists) to assess the methodological qualities and synthesised performing thematic analysis. Two reviewers will independently screen the papers and extracted data. If sufficient data are available, the random-effects model for meta-analysis will be performed to measure the effect size of SDMs or the strengths of relationships. To assess the heterogeneity of effects, I2 together with the observed effects (Q-value, with degrees of freedom) will be used to provide the true effects in the analysis.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval and consent will not be required for this systematic review of the literature as it does not involve human participation. We will be able to disseminate the study findings using the following strategies: we will be publishing at least one paper in peer-reviewed journals, and an abstract will be presented at suitable national/international conferences or workshops. We will also share important information with public health authorities as well as with the World Health Organization. In addition, we may post the submitted manuscript under review to bioRxiv, medRxiv, or other relevant pre-print servers.Strengths and limitations of this studyTo our knowledge, this study will be the first systematic review to examine the impact of social distancing measures to reduce transmission of COVID-19.This study will offer highest level of evidence for informed decisions, drawing a broader framework.This protocol reduces the possibility of duplication, provides transparency to the methods and procedures that will be used, minimise potential biases and allows peer-review.This research is not externally funded, and therefore time and resource will be constrained.If included studies will be variable in sample size, quality and population, which may open to bias, and the heterogeneity of data will preclude a meaningful meta-analysis to measure the impact of specific SDMs

Enhanced antibody responses in infants given different sequences of heterogeneous Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines

1995 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Greenberg ◽  
Jay M. Lieberman ◽  
S.Michael Marcy ◽  
Victor K. Wong ◽  
Susan Partridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Haemophilus Influenzae ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B ◽  
Type B ◽  
Conjugate Vaccines

scholarly journals The impact of antibiotics on growth in children in low and middle income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BMJ ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 348 (apr15 6) ◽  
pp. g2267-g2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Gough ◽  
E. E. M. Moodie ◽  
A. J. Prendergast ◽  
S. M. A. Johnson ◽  
J. H. Humphrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Low And Middle Income
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document