Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Lumbar Synovial Cysts

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 555-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierluigi Vergara ◽  
Christopher Yusuf Akhunbay-Fudge ◽  
Mark Robert Kotter ◽  
Rodney John Charles Laing
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Synovial Cysts

scholarly journals Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Borgfeldt ◽  
Erik Holmberg ◽  
Janusz Marcickiewicz ◽  
Karin Stålberg ◽  
Bengt Tholander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Figo Stage

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to analyze overall survival in endometrial cancer patients’ FIGO stages I-III in relation to surgical approach; minimally invasive (MIS) or open surgery (laparotomy). Methods A population-based retrospective study of 7275 endometrial cancer patients included in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were used in univariable and multivariable survival analyses. Results In univariable analysis open surgery was associated with worse overall survival compared with MIS hazard ratio, HR, 1.39 (95% CI 1.18–1.63) while in the multivariable analysis, surgical approach (MIS vs open surgery) was not associated with overall survival after adjustment for known risk factors (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95–1.32). Higher FIGO stage, non-endometrioid histology, non-diploid tumors, lymphovascular space invasion and increasing age were independent risk factors for overall survival. Conclusion The minimal invasive or open surgical approach did not show any impact on survival for patients with endometrial cancer stages I-III when known prognostic risk factors were included in the multivariable analyses.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of Robotic Lobectomy in Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC after Induction Treatment: A Case Control Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3465
Author(s):  
Monica Casiraghi ◽  
Francesco Petrella ◽  
Giulia Sedda ◽  
Antonio Mazzella ◽  
Juliana Guarize ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Control Study

Despite there already being many studies on robotic surgery as a minimally invasive approach for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the use of this technique for stage III disease is still poorly described. These are the preliminary results of our prospective study on the safety and effectiveness of robotic approaches in patients with locally advanced NSCLC in terms of postoperative complications and oncological outcomes. Since 2016, we prospectively investigated 19 consecutive patients with NSCLC stage IIIA-pN2 (diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA) who underwent lobectomy and radical lymph node dissection with robotic approaches after induction treatment. Furthermore, we matched a case-control study with 46 patients treated with open surgery during the same period of time, with similar age, comorbidities, clinical stage and tumor size. The individual matched population was composed of 16 robot-assisted thoracic surgeries and 16 patients who underwent open surgery. The median time range of resection was inferior in the open group compared to robotic lobectomy (243 vs. 161 min; p < 0.001). Lymph node resection and positivity were not significantly different (p = 0.96 and p = 0.57, respectively). Moreover, no difference was observed for PFS (p = 0.16) or OS (p = 0.41). In conclusion, we demonstrated that the early outcomes and oncological results of N2-patients after robotic lobectomy were similar to those who had open surgery. Considering the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, robot-assisted lobectomy appears to be a safe approach to patients with locally advanced diseases.

Comparing oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive and open surgery for pediatric neuroblastoma and Wilms tumor

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. e26755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Ezekian ◽  
Brian R. Englum ◽  
Brian C. Gulack ◽  
Kristy L. Rialon ◽  
Jina Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes

scholarly journals Impact of SupervIsed TraInIng on the AcquIsItIon of SImulated LaparoscopIc SkIlls

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
NA Healy ◽  
KH Chang ◽  
JB Conneely ◽  
C Malone ◽  
MJ Kerin
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Time Constraints ◽  
Laparoscopic Skills ◽  
Supervised Training ◽  
Initial Learning ◽  
Safety Considerations

Laparoscopy or minimally invasive surgery requires surgeons to attain proficiency in skills that are fundamentally different to those required for open surgery. As a result, it both challenges junior trainees and surgeons who are experienced in open surgery. Not surprisingly, the initial learning phase of laparoscopy has been associated with an increased incidence of serious complications. Owing to time constraints and the ethical and safety considerations of allowing novices to perform laparoscopic surgery on patients, alternative methods have been sought to train junior surgeons on the basics of laparoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy vs Conventional Open Hemithyroidectomy in Asian Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
Reyaz M Singaporewalla ◽  
Anil D Rao ◽  
Arunesh Majumder
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Incision Length ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery

ABSTRACT Introduction Although the technique of minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is well established in continental Europe, data on it's role in Asian patients is limited. We compared the results of MIVAT with conventional open hemithyroidectomy in Asian patients. Materials and methods Over a 1-year period, patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy for benign symptomatic goiters were selected. Inclusion criteria for MIVAT were benign colloid goiters, recurrent cysts or follicular lesions and neoplasms with lobe volume of less than 40 cc or nodule diameter less than 35 mm. Larger goiters underwent conventional open surgery. Patients with previous neck surgery and proven malignancy were excluded. Operative time, complications, postoperative pain score, incision length and cosmetic satisfaction at 6 months were recorded. Results Thirty-six patients (MIVAT-21, Conventional-15) were included. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic profile and co-morbidities. The mean operating time for both groups showed no significant difference (MIVAT = 111.67 ± 19.4 min, Conventional = 112.40 ± 25.06 min; p = 0.925). Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy patients had significantly less pain in the immediate postoperative period (mean pain score 2.38 vs 4.8, p < 0.001). Mean incision length at end of surgery was significantly smaller in the MIVAT group (2.58 vs 6.3 cm; p < 0.001). Neck scar satisfaction at 6 months was excellent in 71.4% of MIVAT cases vs 26.6% of conventional hemithyroidectomy cases. There were no complications in any of the treatment groups. Conclusion In selected cases, MIVAT is as safe as conventional open surgery with distinct advantages of better postoperative pain control and cosmesis. How to cite this article Rao AD, Singaporewalla RM, Majumder A. Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy vs Conventional Open Hemithyroidectomy in Asian Patients. World J Endoc Surg 2016;8(3):189-192.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document