Case of Acromegaly Caused by Rathke Cleft Cyst Mimicking Plurihormonal Pituitary Adenoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 570-575
Author(s):  
Yusuke Morinaga ◽  
Kouhei Nii ◽  
Kimiya Sakamoto ◽  
Ritsurou Inoue ◽  
Takafumi Mitsutake ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Sang Ouk Chin ◽  
Jin-Kyung Hwang ◽  
Sang Youl Rhee ◽  
Suk Chon ◽  
Seungjoon Oh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chaoyue Chen ◽  
Zerong Tian ◽  
Yangfan Cheng ◽  
Jianguo Xu

Objectives. To differentiate pituitary adenoma from Rathke cleft cyst in magnetic resonance (MR) scan by combing MR image features with texture features. Methods. A total number of 133 patients were included in this study, 83 with pituitary adenoma and 50 with Rathke cleft cyst. Qualitative MR image features and quantitative texture features were evaluated by using the chi-square tests or Mann–Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate their ability as independent predictors. ROC analysis was conducted subsequently on the independent predictors to assess their practical value in discrimination and was used to investigate the association between two types of features. Results. Signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image was found to be the only significantly different MR image feature between the two lesions. Two texture features from the contrast-enhanced images (Histo-Skewness and GLCM-Correlation) were found to be the independent predictors in discrimination, of which AUC values were 0.80 and 0.75, respectively. Besides, the above two texture features (Histo-Skewness and GLCM-Contrast) were suggested to be associated with signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image. Conclusion. Signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image was the most significant MR image feature in differentiation between pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst, and texture features also showed promising and practical ability in discrimination. Moreover, two types of features could be coordinated with each other.


Author(s):  
Elżbieta Moszczyńska ◽  
Wiesława Grajkowska ◽  
Maria Maksymowicz ◽  
Joanna Malicka ◽  
Mieczysław Szalecki ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To describe the case of a 12-year-old girl with a rare plurihormonal pituitary macroadenoma secreting prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and alpha subunit (α-SU). Case presentation The patient experienced recurrent headaches and progressing loss of vision in one eye. During the examination, abnormalities such as tall stature, coarse facial features, enlarged feet and hands, tachycardia, hand tremor, hyperhidrosis, galactorrhea, and goiter were observed. Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a solid tumor in the anterior and middle cranial fossa, measuring 80 × 50 × 55 mm. A stereotactic biopsy revealed plurihormonal Pit-1 positive pituitary adenoma secreting PRL, GH, and TSH. A pituitary hyperfunction with PRL, GH, TSH, and α-SU excess was diagnosed. The patient was successfully treated pharmacologically with dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogue, and a decrease of tumor volume (30%) was achieved. Conclusions When neurosurgery is not possible, long-term pharmacological treatment of plurihormonal pituitary macroadenoma can be a safe and relatively effective alternative.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1887-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tang ◽  
Liang Qiao ◽  
Chunyu Zhong ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Junhao Zhu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shinsuke Uraki ◽  
Hiroyuki Ariyasu ◽  
Asako Doi ◽  
Hiroto Furuta ◽  
Masahiro Nishi ◽  
...  

Summary A 54-year-old man had gastrinoma, parathyroid hyperplasia and pituitary tumor. His family history indicated that he might have multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 gene analysis revealed a heterozygous germline mutation (Gly156Arg). Therefore, we diagnosed him with MEN1. Endocrinological tests revealed that his serum prolactin (PRL) and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels were elevated to 1699 ng/mL and 125 pg/mL respectively. Immunohistochemical analysis of the resected pancreatic tumors revealed that the tumors did not express ACTH. Overnight 0.5 and 8 mg dexamethasone suppression tests indicated that his pituitary tumor was a PRL-ACTH-producing plurihormonal tumor. Before transsphenoidal surgery, cabergoline was initiated. Despite no decrease in the volume of the pituitary tumor, PRL and ACTH levels decreased to 37.8 ng/mL and 57.6 pg/mL respectively. Owing to the emergence of metastatic gastrinoma in the liver, octreotide was initiated. After that, PRL and ACTH levels further decreased to 5.1 ng/mL and 19.7 pg/mL respectively. He died from liver dysfunction, and an autopsy of the pituitary tumor was performed. In the autopsy study, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis showed that the tumor was single adenoma and the cells were positive for ACTH, growth hormone (GH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and PRL. RT-PCR analysis showed that the tumor expressed mRNA encoding all anterior pituitary hormones, pituitary transcription factor excluding estrogen receptor (ER) β, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2, SSTR5 and dopamine receptor D (D2R). PRL-ACTH-producing tumor is a very rare type of pituitary tumor, and treatment with cabergoline and octreotide may be useful for controlling hormone levels secreted from a plurihormonal pituitary adenoma, as seen in this case of MEN1. Learning points: Although plurihormonal pituitary adenomas were reported to be more frequent in patients with MEN1 than in those without, the combination of PRL and ACTH is rare. RT-PCR analysis showed that the pituitary tumor expressed various pituitary transcription factors and IHC analysis revealed that the tumor was positive for PRL, ACTH, GH and LH. Generally, the effectiveness of dopamine agonist and somatostatin analog in corticotroph adenomas is low; however, if the plurihormonal pituitary adenoma producing ACTH expresses SSTR2, SSTR5 and D2R, medical therapy for the pituitary adenoma may be effective.


2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Man Yip ◽  
Hui-Hwa Tseng ◽  
Shu-Shong Hsu ◽  
Huang-I Hsu

2016 ◽  
Vol 0 (4(56)) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
О. Е. Третяк ◽  
Л. В. Щекатурова ◽  
Г. А. Кидалова ◽  
Д. Г. Когут

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document