Factors Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Anterior Circulation: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. e128-e134
Author(s):  
Yi-He Zhang ◽  
Ming-Chao Shi ◽  
Zhong-Xiu Wang ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Meng-Yao Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Poor Outcomes

scholarly journals Factors associated with prominent vessel sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging in acute ischemic stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-fei Jiang ◽  
Yi-qun Zhang ◽  
Jiang-xia Pang ◽  
Pei-ning Shao ◽  
Han-cheng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Susceptibility Weighted Imaging ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Univariate Analyses

AbstractThe prominent vessel sign (PVS) on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is not displayed in all cases of acute ischemia. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the presence of PVS in stroke patients. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted within 24 h from symptom onset underwent emergency multimodal MRI at admission. Associated factors for the presence of PVS were analyzed using univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A total of 218 patients were enrolled. The occurrence rate of PVS was 55.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences between PVS-positive group and PVS-negative group in age, history of coronary heart disease, baseline NIHSS scores, total cholesterol, hemoglobin, anterior circulation infarct, large vessel occlusion, and cardioembolism. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that the independent factors associated with PVS were anterior circulation infarct (odds ratio [OR] 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–53.3), large vessel occlusion (OR 123.3; 95% CI 33.7–451.5), and cardioembolism (OR 5.6; 95% CI 2.1–15.3). Anterior circulation infarct, large vessel occlusion, and cardioembolism are independently associated with the presence of PVS on SWI.

Abstract 3314: The Role of Bridging with Intravenous Thrombolysis in Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Kass-Hout ◽  
Tareq Kass-Hout ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
David Orion ◽  
Shadi Jahshan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
P Value ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Nihss Score

Background: Large vessel occlusions with a high clot burden are less likely to improve with the FDA-approved IV strategy. Endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke symptom onset provides an effective alternative treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion. It is not clear if combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular approach is superior to endovascular treatment alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated within the first 3 h stroke onset during the 2005-2010 period. First group received endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke onset. Second group consisted of patients who received IV thrombolysis within the first 3 h followed by endovascular therapy. We compared the following outcomes: revascularization rates, NIHSS score at discharge, mRS at discharge and 3months, symptomatic hemorrhage rates and mortality. Results: Among 104 patients identified, 42 received combined therapy, and 62 received endovascular therapy only. The two groups had similar demographic (age and sex distribution) and vascular risk factors distribution, as well as NIHSS score on admission (14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; p=0.23). We found no difference in TIMI recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) following combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.3% and 79.0%; p=0.59). A preferred outcome, defined as a mRS of 2 or less at 90 days also did not differ between the combined therapy group and the endovascular only group (37.5% and 34.5%; p=0.76). There was no difference in mortality rate (22.5% and 31.0%; p=0.36) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.5% and 8.1%; p=0.73). There was a significant difference in mean time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment between the combined group (227±88 min) and endovascular only group (125±40 min; p<0.0001).Patients with good TIMI recanalization rate of 2 or 3 showed a trend of having a better mRS at 90 days in both bridging (16.67% vs. 41.18%, p-value: 0.3813) and endovascular groups (25% vs. 34.78%, p-value: 0.7326).When analyzing the correlation of mRS at 90 days with the site of occlusion, patients in the bridging group showed a trend of a better outcome when the site of occlusion was ICA (33.3% vs 30%) and MCA (66.67% vs. 27.59%) and worse outcome when the site of occlusion was in the posterior circulation (26.32% vs. 50%), however, these results were not statistically significant (p-values: 0.1735& 0.5366). Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy achieves similar rates of clinical outcomes, revascularization rates, complications and mortality rates, when compared with endovascular treatment alone. The combined therapy, however, significantly delays initiation of endovascular treatment. A randomized prospective trial comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke is warranted

Abstract WP39: Mechanical Embolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond Six Hours From Symptom Onset Using Advanced MR Imaging

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan McTaggart ◽  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
Daniel C Sacchetti ◽  
Richard Haas ◽  
Shawna Cutting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Lesion Volume ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome

Background: There is very limited data on the use of advanced neuroimaging to select patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion for intraarterial therapy beyond 6 hours from onset. Our aim is to report the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion who presented beyond 6 hours from onset, had favorable MRI imaging profile, and underwent mechanical embolectomy. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study between December 1st, 2015, and July 30 th , 2016 with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) with ASPECTS of 6 or more and beyond 6 hours from symptoms onset. Favorable imaging profile was defined as 1) DWI lesion volume (as defined as apparent diffusion coefficient < 620 X 10-6 mm2/s) of 70 mL or less AND 2) Penumbra volume (as defined by volume of tissue with Tmax >6 sec) of 15 mL or greater AND 3) A mismatch ratio of 1.8 or more AND 4) Volume of tissue with perfusion lesion with Tmax > 10 sec is less than 100 mL. Good outcome was defined as a 90 day mRS≤2. Results: In the study period, 41 patients met the inclusion criteria; 22 (53.6%) had favorable imaging profile and underwent mechanical embolectomy. The median age was 75 years (59-92), 68.2% were females; the median time from last known normal to groin puncture was 684.5 minutes (range 363-1628) and the median admission NIHSS score was 17.5 (range 4-28). The rate of good outcomes in this series was similar to that in a patient level pooled meta-analysis of the recent endovascular trials (68.2% vs. 46.0%, p=0.07). The rate of good outcome matches that of the EXTEND-IA trial that selected patients using perfusion imaging (68.2% vs. 71.0%, p = 1.00). None of the patients in our cohort had symptomatic intracereberal hemorrhage. Conclusion: Advanced MR imaging may help select patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion for embolectomy beyond the treatment window used in most endovascular trials.

Abstract TP43: Is Unintended Hypothermia After Endovascular Therapy Associated With Improved Functional Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke?

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hartmann ◽  
Simon Winzer ◽  
Timo Siepmann ◽  
Lars-Peder Pallesen ◽  
Alexandra Prakapenia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Risk Ratios

Introduction: Hypothermia may be neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) who receive endovascular therapy (EVT) are frequently hypothermic after the procedure. We sought to analyze whether this unintended hypothermia was associated with improved functional outcome. Methods: We extracted data of consecutive patients (01/2016-04/2019) from our prospective EVT database that includes all patients screened for EVT at our center. We included patients with acLVO who received EVT and analyzed recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) and complications (i.e., pneumonia, bradyarrhythmia, venous thromboembolism) during the hospital course. We assessed functional outcome at 3 months and analyzed risk ratios (RR) for good outcome (mRS scores 0-2) and mortality of patients who were hypothermic (<36°C) compared to patients who were normothermic ( > 36°C) after EVT. We compared the frequency of complications and calculated RRs for good outcome and mortality in the subgroup with recanalization. Results: Among 674 patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke, 372 patients received EVT for acLVO (178 [47%] male, age 77 years [65-82], NIHSS score 16 [12 - 20]). Of these, 186 patients (50%) were hypothermic (median [IQR] temperature 35.2°C [34.7-35.6]) and 186 patients were normothermic (media temperature 36.4 [36.2-36.8]) after EVT. At 3 months, 54 of 186 (29.0%) hypothermic patients compared with 65 of 186 (35.0%) normothermic patients had a good outcome (RR, 0.83; 95%CI 0.62-1.12) and 52 of 186 (27.9%) hypothermic patients compared with 46 of 186 (24.7%) normothermic patients had died (RR, 1.13; 95%CI 0.8-1.59). This relation was consistent in 307 patients (82.5% of all EVTs) with successful recanalization (good outcome: RR, 0.85; 95%CI 0.63-1.14.; mortality: RR, 1.05; 95%CI 0.7-1.57). More hypothermic patients suffered pneumonia (37.8% vs. 24.7%; p=0.003) or bradyarrhythmia (55.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001). Venous thromboembolism was distributed similarly (5.4% vs. 6.5%; p=0.42). Conclusion: Unintended hypothermia following EVT for acLVO was not associated with improved functional outcome or reduced mortality but an increased complication rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals Workflow Intervals of Endovascular Acute Stroke Therapy During On- Versus Off-Hours

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2842-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter H. Hinsenveld ◽  
Inger R. de Ridder ◽  
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽  
Jan A. Vos ◽  
Adrien E. Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with acute ischemic stroke because of large vessel occlusion involves complicated logistics, which may cause a delay in treatment initiation during off-hours. This might lead to a worse functional outcome. We compared workflow intervals between endovascular treatment–treated patients presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods— We retrospectively analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study in the Netherlands and included patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who presented between March 2014 and June 2016. Off-hours were defined as presentation on Monday to Friday between 17:00 and 08:00 hours, weekends (Friday 17:00 to Monday 8:00) and national holidays. Primary end point was first door to groin time. Secondary end points were functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) and workflow time intervals. We stratified for transfer status, adjusted for prognostic factors, and used linear and ordinal regression models. Results— We included 1488 patients of which 936 (62.9%) presented during off-hours. Median first door to groin time was 140 minutes (95% CI, 110–182) during off-hours and 121 minutes (95% CI, 85–157) during on-hours. Adjusted first door to groin time was 14.6 minutes (95% CI, 9.3–20.0) longer during off-hours. Door to needle times for intravenous therapy were slightly longer (3.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.7–6.3) during off-hours. Groin puncture to reperfusion times did not differ between groups. For transferred patients, the delay within the intervention center was 5.0 minutes (95% CI, 0.5–9.6) longer. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients presenting during off- and on-hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14). Reperfusion rates and complication rates were similar. Conclusions— Presentation during off-hours is associated with a slight delay in start of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This treatment delay did not translate into worse functional outcome or increased complication rates.

Prestroke Disability and Outcome After Thrombectomy for Emergent Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012827
Author(s):  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Alicia Castonguay ◽  
Raul Nogueira ◽  
Thanh N. Nguyen ◽  
Joey English ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

ObjectiveTo determine the impact of endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion stroke in patients with pre-morbid disability versus those without.MethodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of the TREVO Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke (TRACK) Registry, which collected data on 634 consecutive stroke patients treated with the Trevo device as first-line EVT at 23 centers in the United States. We included patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral (M1/M2 segment) artery occlusions and the study exposure was patient- or caregiver-reported premorbid modified Rank Scale (mRS) ≥2 (premorbid disability, PD) versus premorbid mRS score 0-1 (no premorbid disability, NPD). The primary outcome was no accumulated disability, defined as no increase in 90-day mRS from the patient’s pre-morbid mRS.ResultsOf the 634 patients in TRACK, 407 patients were included in our cohort, of which 53/407 (13.0%) had PD. The primary outcome of no accumulated disability was achieved in 37.7% (20/53) of patients with PD and 16.7% (59/354) of patients with NPD (p<0.001), while death occurred in 39.6% (21/53) and 14.1% (50/354) (p<0.001), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of no accumulated disability for PD patients was 5.2 (95% CI 2.4-11.4, p<0.001) compared to patients with NPD. However, the adjusted odds ratio for death in PD patients was 2.90 (95% CI 1.38-6.09, p=0.005).ConclusionsIn this study of anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT, we found that premorbid disability was associated with a higher probability of not accumulating further disability compared to patients with no premorbid disability, but also with higher probability of death.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke treated with EVT, patients with premorbid disability compared to those without disability were more likely not to accumulate more disability but were more likely to die.


Abstract TMP5: The Smoking-Thrombolysis Paradox in Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Bouslama ◽  
Leticia C Rebello ◽  
Diogo C Haussen ◽  
Jonathan A Grossberg ◽  
Shannon Doppelheuer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose: The smoking-thrombolysis paradox has been well described in myocardial infarction. However, its existence in the stroke population remains elusive. In the past decade, several studies have investigated the phenomenon with mixed results. We sought to determine whether clinical outcomes differ between smokers and non-smokers with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy. Methods: We reviewed our prospectively collected endovascular database at a tertiary care academic institution. All patients who underwent endovascular therapy for acute large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke were categorized into current smokers and non-smokers. Baseline characteristics, procedural radiological as well as outcome parameters where compared. Results: A total of 968 patients qualified for the study of which 189 (19.5%) were current smokers. Smokers were younger (60.78±11.95 vs. 66.41±15.05 years, p<0.001), had higher rates of dyslipidemia (49.7% vs 31.7%, p<0.001) and posterior circulation strokes (13.2% vs 7.8%, p=0.02,) and lower rates of atrial fibrillation (21.1% vs 37.9%, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of stroke severity (as assessed by NIHSS), baseline CT perfusion core and hypoperfusion volumes, CT angiogram collateral scores as well as procedural variables. On univariate analysis, smokers had higher rates of good outcomes at 90 days (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-2: 53.8% vs 42.8%, p=0.01) and similar rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) (92.1% vs 87.7%, p=0.09), parenchymal hematomas (4.2% vs 4%, p=0.84) and mortality at 90 days (20.2% vs 25.7%, p=0.14). Multivariate analysis showed that smoking was not independently associated with good outcomes. Stratifying for (1) stroke etiology and (2) anterior vs. posterior circulation topology yielded similar results. Conclusion: In stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, smoking does not seem to be associated with outcomes regardless of stroke subtype or location.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document