Does lymph node dissection impact adjuvant treatment or survival outcomes in high-risk endometrial cancers?

Abstract Background We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. Results Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. Conclusion This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments.

Download Full-text

MRC SORCE trial: Analysis of patients' presenting characteristics, tumor staging, and surgical approach.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.496 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 496-496 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alastair W. S. Ritchie ◽

Angela M. Meade ◽

Louise Choo ◽

Ben Smith ◽

Andrew Welland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lymph Node ◽

High Risk ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Lymph Node Dissection ◽

Surgical Approach ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Node Dissection ◽

Laparoscopic Procedures ◽

Operative Complications ◽

Post Operative Complications

496 Background: SORCE is a randomised double blind trial of sorafenib, given for one or three years, versus placebo for patients at moderate or high risk of disease recurrence after surgical excision of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Between July 2007 and April 2013, 1,711 patients were recruited from the UK (78%), Australia, France, Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands and Spain. We describe the presenting characteristics, staging and surgical details of the randomised population. The surgical approach was at the surgeon’s discretion. Results: Baseline information is available for 1,681 patients (98%). Median age was 59 years (range 19 to 86): 1,195 (71%) were male. Histology was conventional/clear cell in 86%. T category was pT1a (<1%), pT1b (11%), pT2 (23%), pT3a-4 (65%). 47% were at high risk of recurrence with Leibovich scores of ≥6. Surgical data are available for 1,528 patients (89%). Total (radical) nephrectomy was performed for 97% of patients with 44% having laparoscopic surgery, of which 60% had a transperitoneal approach and 10% required conversion to open surgery. Some form of lymph node dissection was performed in 25% of patients (33% of open procedures and 15% of lap. procedures). The ipsi-lateral adrenal was removed in 47% and 11% had simultaneous resection of other structures/organs. Excision of venous extension was required in 19%. Laparoscopic procedures were performed for 58% of patients with maximum tumour diameter (MTD) <10cm and 17% of those with MTD ≥ 10 cm. Intra-operative complications were reported in 6% and post-operative complications reported in 12%. Hospital stay was median (IQR) 4 days (3-5) for patients having laparoscopic procedures and 7 days (5-8) for open surgery. Hospital stay was median (IQR) 8 days (6-11) for those having post-operative complications compared to 5 days (4-7) for uncomplicated recovery. Conclusions: These data reveal the varied surgical approaches to excision of primary RCC and will inform future adjuvant trials. The use of lymph node dissection appears arbitrary and evidence of benefit from randomised controlled trials is required. Analysis of the effect of sorafenib on disease free survival is likely to be performed in 2016. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN38934710.

Download Full-text

The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.e543 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. e543-e543

Author(s):

Takuya Koie ◽

Teppei Ookubo ◽

Koji Mitsuzuka ◽

Shintaro Narita ◽

Takamitsu Inoue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

High Risk ◽

Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽

Lymph Node Dissection ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Node Dissection ◽

Extended Lymph Node Dissection ◽

High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer

e543 Background: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in high-risk Pca patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) (LHRH+EMP) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to assess whether neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP confers an oncological benefit for high-risk Pca compared to extended lymph node dissection (e-PLND). Methods: The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained the data of 2403 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP at 4 institutes between March 2000 and December 2014. In the e-PLND group, we identified 238 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and e-PLND, with lymphatic tissue removal around the obturator and the external iliac regions, and hypogastric lymph node dissection. The neoadjuvant therapy with limited PLND (l-PLND) group included 280 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and removal of the obturator node chain between September 2005 and June 2014 at Hirosaki University. The neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy included the administration of 280 mg/day of LHRH and EMP for 6 months before RP. The outcome measure was BRFS. Results: The 5-year BRFS rates for the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group and e-PLND group were 84.9% and 54.7%, respectively ( P < 0.0001). The operative time was significantly longer in the e-PLND group compared to that of the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group. Grade 3/4 surgery-related complications were not identified in both groups. Conclusions: Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy followed by RP might reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence.

Download Full-text

Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: A multicenter prospective phase III imaging study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5502 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5502-5502 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Thomas A Hope ◽

Wesley R Armstrong ◽

Vishnu Murthy ◽

Courtney Lawhn Heath ◽

Spencer Behr ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lymph Node ◽

High Risk ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Lymph Node Dissection ◽

Predictive Value ◽

False Negative ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Nodal Metastases ◽

Node Dissection ◽

Node Size

5502 Background: To determine the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases (N1) compared to histopathology at time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: This is a prospective multicenter single-arm open-label phase 3 imaging trial. Patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer (PCa) considered for RP with lymph node dissection (PLND) were enrolled at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and at the San Francisco (UCSF) (NCT03368547, NCT02611882, NCT02919111), and underwent one 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for the N1 detection compared to PLND histopathology (reference-standard) on a per patient basis using nodal region-based correlation. Each scan was read by three blinded independent central readers (BICR). Consensus was based on majority rule. Results: From December 2015 to August 2019, 633 patients underwent one 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for primary staging, and 277/633 (44%) subsequently underwent RP and PLND. The median initial PSA was 11.1 [0.04-147]. 75/277 patients (27%) had N1 disease per histopathology. Using a regional based analysis, Se, Sp, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for N1 detection was 0.40 [0.34, 0.46], 0.95 [0.92, 0.97], 0.75 [0.70, 0.80], 0.81 [0.76, 0.85], respectively. Se was higher for patients with higher PSA: 0.29 [0.24, 0.35] for PSA < 11 ng/ml versus 0.48 [0.42, 0.54] for PSA > 11. Se was higher when the nodes were larger: 0.30 [0.25, 0.36] for nodes < 10 mm versus 0.68 [0.63, 0.74] for nodes > 10. The average node size in true positive patients was 10 mm versus 4 mm in false negative patients. Conclusions: In intermediate to high risk PCa patients who underwent RP and PLND, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected pelvic nodal metastases with a sensitivity of 0.40 and a specificity of 0.95. Higher PSAs and larger node size correlated with increased sensitivity. Clinical trial information: NCT03368547, NCT02611882, NCT02919111 .

Download Full-text