A randomized comparison of 4 courses of standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy versus 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine alone in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: the JALSG AML201 Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
R.J. Arceci
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Multiagent Chemotherapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Double Induction Containing Either Two Courses or One Course of High-Dose Cytarabine Plus Mitoxantrone and Postremission Therapy by Either Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation or by Prolonged Maintenance for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2480-2489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Büchner ◽  
Wolfgang E. Berdel ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Hubert L. Serve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose Intensification by high-dose cytarabine in postremission or induction therapy and prolonged maintenance are established strategies to improve the outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Whether additional intensification can add to this effect has not yet been determined. Patients and Methods A total of 1,770 patients (age 16 to 85 years) with de novo or secondary AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were randomly assigned upfront for induction therapy containing one course with standard dose and one course with high-dose cytarabine, or two courses with high-dose cytarabine, and in the same step received postremission prolonged maintenance or busulfan/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. Results The complete remission rate in patients younger than 60 and ≥ 60 years of age was 70% and 53%, respectively. The overall survival at 3 years in the two age groups was 42% and 19%, the relapse-free survival was 40% and 19%, and the ongoing remission duration was 48% and 22%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these results between the two randomized induction arms or between the two postremission therapy arms. There was no significant difference in any prognostic subgroup according to secondary AML/MDS, cytogenetics, WBC, lactate dehydrogenase, and early blast clearance. Conclusion The regimen of one course with standard-dose cytarabine and one course with high-dose cytarabine for induction, and prolonged maintenance for postremission chemotherapy in patients with AML is not improved by additional escalation in cytotoxic treatment.

A randomized comparison of 4 courses of standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy versus 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine alone in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: the JALSG AML201 Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 2366-2372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Miyawaki ◽  
Shigeki Ohtake ◽  
Shin Fujisawa ◽  
Hitoshi Kiyoi ◽  
Katsuji Shinagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Multiagent Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract We conducted a prospective randomized study to assess the optimal postremission therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia in patients younger than 65 years in the first complete remission. A total of 781 patients in complete remission were randomly assigned to receive consolidation chemotherapy of either 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC, 2 g/m2 twice daily for 5 days) alone or 4 courses of conventional standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy (CT) established in the previous JALSG AML97 study. Five-year disease-free survival was 43% for the HiDAC group and 39% for the multiagent CT group (P = .724), and 5-year overall survival was 58% and 56%, respectively (P = .954). Among the favorable cytogenetic risk group (n = 218), 5-year disease-free survival was 57% for HiDAC and 39% for multiagent CT (P = .050), and 5-year overall survival was 75% and 66%, respectively (P = .174). In the HiDAC group, the nadir of leukocyte counts was lower, and the duration of leukocyte less than 1.0 × 109/L longer, and the frequency of documented infections higher. The present study demonstrated that the multiagent CT regimen is as effective as our HiDAC regimen for consolidation. Our HiDAC regimen resulted in a beneficial effect on disease-free survival only in the favorable cytogenetic leukemia group. This trial was registered at www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as #C000000157.

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation With or Without Additional Amsacrine and Mitoxantrone in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of the Prospective Randomized AML2003 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (17) ◽  
pp. 2094-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Schaich ◽  
Stefani Parmentier ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Thomas Illmer ◽  
Friedrich Stölzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To assess the treatment outcome benefit of multiagent consolidation in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients and Methods Between December 2003 and November 2009, 1,179 patients (median age, 48 years; range, 16 to 60 years) with untreated AML were randomly assigned at diagnosis to receive either standard high-dose cytarabine consolidation with three cycles of 18 g/m2 (3× HD-AraC) or multiagent consolidation with two cycles of mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) plus cytarabine (12 g/m2) and one cycle of amsacrine (500 mg/m2) plus cytarabine (10 g/m2; MAC/MAMAC/MAC). Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations were performed in a risk-adapted and priority-based manner. Results After double induction therapy using a 3 + 7 regimen including standard-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin, complete remission was achieved in 65% of patients. In the primary efficacy population of patients evaluable for consolidation outcomes, consolidation with either 3× HD-AraC or MAC/MAMC/MAC did not result in any significant difference in 3-year overall (69% v 64%; P = .18) or disease-free survival (46% v 48%; P = .99) according to the intention-to-treat analysis. Furthermore, MAC/MAMAC/MAC led to additional GI and hepatic toxicity and a higher rate of infection and bleeding, resulting in significantly shorter 3-year overall survival in the per-protocol analysis compared with 3× HD-AraC (63% v 72%; P = .04). Conclusion In younger adults with AML, multiagent consolidation using mitoxantrone and amsacrine in combination with high-dose cytarabine does not improve treatment outcome and confers additional toxicity.

Prognostic significance of activating FLT3 mutations in younger adults (16 to 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: a study of the AML Study Group Ulm

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (13) ◽  
pp. 4372-4380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Fröhling ◽  
Richard F. Schlenk ◽  
Jochen Breitruck ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Sylvia Kreitmeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Normal Cytogenetics ◽  
Acute Myeloid

To assess the prognostic relevance of activating mutations of theFLT3 gene in homogeneously treated adults 16 to 60 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and normal cytogenetics, pretreatment samples from 224 patients entered into 2 consecutive multicenter treatment trials were analyzed for FLT3internal tandem duplications (ITDs) and Asp835 mutations. Treatment included intensive double-induction therapy and postremission therapy with high cumulative doses of high-dose cytarabine. ITDs were detected in 32% of the patients and were related to de novo AML and to high white blood cell (WBC) counts, percentages of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) blasts, and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. Asp835 mutations were present in 14% of the patients and were associated with WBC counts and percentages of PB and BM blasts that were higher than those of patients without FLT3mutations. With a median follow-up of 34 months, remission duration and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter for patients with Asp835 mutations or an ITD than for those without FLT3 mutations (P = .03 and P = .0004, respectively). These results were attributable mainly to the negative prognostic effect of FLT3 ITDs. On multivariate analysis, mutantFLT3 was an independent marker affecting remission duration and OS (hazard ratio, 2.35 and 2.11, respectively). Fluorescence in situ hybridization did not detect monoallelicFLT3 deletions in ITD-positive patients. FLT3mutations identify a subset of young AML patients with normal cytogenetics who do not benefit from intensive chemotherapy, including double-induction and postremission therapy with high-dose cytarabine.

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document