327. Functional MRI of implicit learning in Huntington’s disease

2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. S98
Author(s):  
T. Brashers-Krug ◽  
G.D. Pearlson
2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Suh Kim ◽  
Sarah A.J Reading ◽  
Thomas Brashers-Krug ◽  
Vince D Calhoun ◽  
Christopher A Ross ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Papoutsi ◽  
Joerg Magerkurth ◽  
Oliver Josephs ◽  
Sophia E Pépés ◽  
Temi Ibitoye ◽  
...  

Abstract Non-invasive methods, such as neurofeedback training, could support cognitive symptom management in Huntington’s disease by targeting brain regions whose function is impaired. The aim of our single-blind, sham-controlled study was to collect rigorous evidence regarding the feasibility of neurofeedback training in Huntington’s disease by examining two different methods, activity and connectivity real-time functional MRI neurofeedback training. Thirty-two Huntington’s disease gene-carriers completed 16 runs of neurofeedback training, using an optimized real-time functional MRI protocol. Participants were randomized into four groups, two treatment groups, one receiving neurofeedback derived from the activity of the supplementary motor area, and another receiving neurofeedback based on the correlation of supplementary motor area and left striatum activity (connectivity neurofeedback training), and two sham control groups, matched to each of the treatment groups. We examined differences between the groups during neurofeedback training sessions and after training at follow-up sessions. Transfer of training was measured by measuring the participants’ ability to upregulate neurofeedback training target levels without feedback (near transfer), as well as by examining change in objective, a priori defined, behavioural measures of cognitive and psychomotor function (far transfer) before and at 2 months after training. We found that the treatment group had significantly higher neurofeedback training target levels during the training sessions compared to the control group. However, we did not find robust evidence of better transfer in the treatment group compared to controls, or a difference between the two neurofeedback training methods. We also did not find evidence in support of a relationship between change in cognitive and psychomotor function and learning success. We conclude that although there is evidence that neurofeedback training can be used to guide participants to regulate the activity and connectivity of specific regions in the brain, evidence regarding transfer of learning and clinical benefit was not robust.


1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1213-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Bylsma ◽  
George W. Rebok ◽  
Jason Brandt

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke van Asselen ◽  
Inês Almeida ◽  
Filipa Júlio ◽  
Cristina Januário ◽  
Elzbieta Bobrowicz Campos ◽  
...  

AbstractHuntington's disease (HD) is a genetic neurodegenerative disorder affecting the basal ganglia. These subcortical structures are particularly important for motor functions, response selection and implicit learning. In the current study, we have assessed prodromal and symptomatic HD participants with an implicit contextual learning task that is not based on motor learning, but on a purely visual implicit learning mechanism. We used an implicit contextual learning task in which subjects need to locate a target among several distractors. In half of the trials, the positions of the distractors and target stimuli were repeated. By memorizing this contextual information, attention can be guided faster to the target stimulus. Nine symptomatic HD participants, 16 prodromal HD participants and 22 control subjects were included. We found that the responses of the control subjects were faster for the repeated trials than for the new trials, indicating that their visual search was facilitated when repeated contextual information was present. In contrast, no difference in response times between the repeated and new trials was found for the symptomatic and prodromal HD participants. The results of the current study indicate that both prodromal and symptomatic HD participants are impaired on an implicit contextual learning task. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1–8)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document