An assessment of the clinical potential of ultra high speed ir echo-planar imaging of the brain

1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 636-637

Ultra-high-speed echo-planar imaging (EP1) allows acquisition of a complete twodimensional image in 64 to 128 ms devoid of movement artefact and without sacrifice of contrast due to relaxation time effects. In conventional whole-body MRI, however, obtrusive movement artefact and extended imaging time, resulting from the need to apply multiple sequences to facilitate lesion detection and pathological characterization, remain limitations. Reduced total examination time increases patient tolerance and throughput • furthermore optimization of contrast to achieve maximal conspicuity of particular features in liver or brain pathology is achieved simply and interactively by real time adjustment of the imaging parameters. The method provides the opportunity to study in real time dynamic events such as flow phenomena in the vascular and cerebrospinal fluid compartments of the brain as well as the kinetics of administered contrast agents, EPI is the only means of capturing the irregular motion of aperiodic cardiac events and bowel peristalsis.


1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 833-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ozdoba ◽  
L. Remonda ◽  
O. Heid ◽  
K.-O. L�vblad ◽  
G. Schroth

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Ordidge ◽  
P. Gibbs ◽  
B. Chapman ◽  
M. K. Stehling ◽  
P. Mansfield

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mansfield ◽  
Ronald Coxon ◽  
Paul Glover

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Worthington ◽  
P. Bullock ◽  
M. Stehlings ◽  
P. Gowlnad ◽  
J. L. Firth ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Seidel ◽  
Seth M. Levine ◽  
Marlene Tahedl ◽  
Jens V. Schwarzbach

Echo planar imaging (EPI) is the most common method of functional magnetic resonance imaging for acquiring the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast. One of the primary benefits of using EPI is that an entire volume of the brain can be acquired on the order of two seconds. However, this speed benefit comes with a cost. Because imaging protocols are limited by hardware (e.g., fast gradient switching), researchers are forced to compromise between spatial resolution, temporal resolution, or whole-brain coverage. Earlier attempts to circumvent this problem included developing protocols in which slices of a volume were acquired faster (i.e., slice (S) acceleration), while more recent protocols allow for multiple slices to be acquired simultaneously (i.e., multiband (MB) acceleration). However, applying such acceleration methods can lead to a reduction in the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), which is a critical measure of the stability of the signal over time. Here we show, in five healthy subjects, using a 20- and 64-channel receiver coil, that enabling S-acceleration consistently yielded, as expected, a substantial decrease in tSNR, regardless of the receiver coil employed, whereas tSNR decrease resulting from MB acceleration was less pronounced. Specifically, with the 20-channel coil, tSNR of upto 4-fold MB-acceleration is comparable to that of no acceleration, while up to 6-fold MB-acceleration with the 64-channel coil yields comparable tSNR to that of no acceleration. Moreover, observed tSNR losses tended to be localized to temporal, insular, and medial brain regions and were more noticeable in the 20-than in the 64-channel coil. Conversely, with the 64-channel coil, the tSNR in lateral frontoparietal regions remained relatively stable with increasing MB factors. Such methodological explorations can inform researchers and clinicians as to how they can optimize imaging protocols depending on the available hardware and the brain regions they want to investigate.


1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn S. Slavin ◽  
Kim Butts ◽  
John N. Rydberg ◽  
Clifford R. Jack ◽  
Stephen J. Riederer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document