Do serum pepsinogen and gastrin predict gastric intestinal metaplasia?

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A179
Author(s):  
Chiara Ricci ◽  
Massimo Rugge ◽  
Nimish Vakil ◽  
Luigi Gatta ◽  
Federico Perna ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A606
Author(s):  
Hubert Nietsch ◽  
Cyrus E. Rubin ◽  
Tsukasa Namekata ◽  
Kazumasa Miki ◽  
Michael B. Kimmey

2020 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-139183
Author(s):  
Deniz Ogutmen Koc ◽  
Sibel Bektas

BackgroundWe assessed the validity of using serum pepsinogen tests (sPGTs) to differentiate autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) from environmental atrophic gastritis (EAG). We also investigated the correlation and prognostic value between disease stage, according to Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)/Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM), and sPGT results in patients with gastric atrophy.MethodsWe enroled 115 patients in this prospective study: 95 with atrophic gastritis (16 with AAG and 79 with EAG) and 20 non-atrophic gastritis. These patients, along with 32 control patients, underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Atrophy and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric biopsy specimens were staged according to the OLGA/OLGIM staging systems.ResultsThe median (IQR) age of the patients (83 females (56.5%)) was 58 (46–67) years. Patients in the AAG group represented histologically advanced stages. The AAG group had lower pepsinogen (PG) I and II levels, as well as a lower PGI/PGII ratio, compared with the EAG group (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The optimal PGI/PGII ratio for predicting AAG was ≤1.9 (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and that for predicting EAG was ≤9.2 (47.5% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity). The OLGA/OLGIM stage was negatively correlated with the PGI level and PGI/PGII ratio. In the AAG group, four of five patients with low-grade dysplasia had OLGA/OLGIM stage III–IV disease.ConclusionssPGT may provide valuable information for differentiating advanced-stage AAG from EAG, and in patients with atrophic gastritis, use of sPGTs and OLGA/OLGIM staging together may predict gastric cancer risk.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Esposito ◽  
P Pimentel-Nunes ◽  
S Angeletti ◽  
R Castro ◽  
D Libânio ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Mesquita ◽  
Raquel Almeida ◽  
Nuno Lunet ◽  
Celso A. Reis ◽  
Luis Filipe Santos Silva ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052199049
Author(s):  
Xujuan Liu ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Riyu Luo ◽  
Keran Mo ◽  
Xingxiang He

Objective Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) relies on gastroscopy and histopathologic biopsy, but their application in screening for GIM is limited. We aimed to identify serological biomarkers of GIM via screening in Guangdong, China. Methods Cross-sectional field and questionnaire data, demographic information, past medical history, and other relevant data were collected. Blood samples were collected for pepsinogen (PG)I, PGII, gastrin-17, and Helicobacter pylori antibody testing, and gastroscopy and histopathologic biopsy were performed. Single factor and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between these indicators and GIM, and decision tree models were used to determine the cut-off points between indicators. Results Of 443 participants enrolled, 87 (19.6%) were diagnosed with GIM. Single factor analysis showed that pepsin indicators (PGI, PGII, and PGI/PGII ratio) and the factors Mandarin as native language, urban residency, hyperlipidemia, and age were associated with GIM. Logistic regression analysis showed that PGI and age were associated with GIM. Conclusions Age is an important factor for predicting GIM progression; age >60 years increased its risk. Detection of GIM was higher in individuals with PGI levels >127.20 ng/mL, which could be used as a threshold indicating the need to perform gastroscopy and histopathologic biopsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document