Mo1159 - Difference Between the Upper and the Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-692
Author(s):  
Kyohei Maruyama ◽  
Takatsugu Yamamoto ◽  
Shun Osumi ◽  
Daisuke Yanagisawa ◽  
Hiroshi Yamato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

scholarly journals Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology

Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 776-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Oakland ◽  
Georgina Chadwick ◽  
James E East ◽  
Richard Guy ◽  
Adam Humphries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
British Society ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Guidelines Development

This is the first UK national guideline to concentrate on acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) and has been commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). The Guidelines Development Group consisted of representatives from the BSG Endoscopy Committee, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Society of Interventional Radiology, the Royal College of Radiologists, NHS Blood and Transplant and a patient representative. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken and the quality of evidence and grading of recommendations appraised according to the GRADE(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. These guidelines focus on the diagnosis and management of acute LGIB in adults, including methods of risk assessment and interventions to diagnose and treat bleeding (colonoscopy, computed tomography, mesenteric angiography, endoscopic therapy, embolisation and surgery). Recommendations are included on the management of patients who develop LGIB while receiving anticoagulants (including direct oral anticoagulants) or antiplatelet drugs. The appropriate use of blood transfusion is also discussed, including haemoglobin triggers and targets.

A Review on the Use of Reversal Agents of Direct Oral Anticogulant Drugs in Case of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Ojetti ◽  
Angela Saviano ◽  
Mattia Brigida ◽  
Luisa Saviano ◽  
Alessio Migneco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Reversal Agents ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Andexanet Alfa

Background : Major bleeding is a life-threatening condition and a medical emergency with high mortality risk. It is often the complication of anticoagulant’s intake. Anticoagulants are commonly used for the prevention and the treatment of thrombotic events. The standard therapy with vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) has been frequently replaced by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The latter agents (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, betrixaban) showed a better efficacy and safety compared to standard warfarin treatment and they are recommended for the reduction of ischemic stroke. Literature data reported a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with DOACs, in particular with dabigatran and rivaroxaban. In case of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding, these patients could benefit from the use of reversal agents. Methods: We performed an electronic search on PUBMED of the literature concerning reversal agents for DOACs and gastrointestinal bleeding in the Emergency Department from 2004 to 2020. AIM: This review summarizes the current evidences about three reversal agents idarucizumab, andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, and the use of the first two in the emergency setting in patients with an active major bleeding or who need urgent surgery to offer physicians indications for a better management approach in order to increase patient’s safety. Conclusion: Although these agents have been marketed for five years (idarucizumab) and two years (andexanet alfa) respectively, and despite guidelines considering antidotes as first-line agents in treating life-threatening hemorrhage when available, these antidotes seem to gain access very slowly in the clinical practice. Cost, logistical aspects and need for plasma level determination of DOAC for an accurate therapeutic use probably have an impact on this phenomenon.. An expert multidisciplinary bleeding team should be established so as to implement international guidelines based on local resources and organization.

Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy After Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Whether to, When to, and How to Restart an Anticoagulation Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1000-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Kido ◽  
Michael J. Scalese
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

Objective: To evaluate current clinical evidence for management of oral anticoagulation therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with an emphasis on whether to, when to, and how to resume an anticoagulation therapy. Data Sources: Relevant articles from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were identified from 1946 through May 20, 2017, using the keywords: gastrointestinal hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding and antithrombotic therapy or anticoagulation therapy or warfarin or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or apixaban or edoxaban.Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language studies assessing management of oral anticoagulation therapy after GIB were evaluated. Data Synthesis: A total of 9 studies were identified. Four retrospective cohort studies showed that resuming anticoagulation therapy was associated with significantly lower rate of thromboembolism (TE) in the general population. Meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies also supported this finding. Two retrospective cohort studies indicated an increase in GIB when anticoagulation reinitiation occurred in less than 7 days without a decrease in TE. Resuming therapy between 7 and 15 days did not demonstrate a significant increase in GIB or TE. A large retrospective study showed that apixaban was associated with the significantly lowest risk of GIB compared with both rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Conclusion: Anticoagulation therapy resumption is recommended, with resumption being considered between 7 and 14 days following GIB regardless of the therapy chosen. Data for warfarin management after GIB should be applied with caution to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the quicker onset and experimental nature of reversal agents. Apixaban may be a preferred option when restarting a DOAC therapy.

Tu1125 DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS OF GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING AMONG DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB570
Author(s):  
Muneaki Miyake ◽  
Yuichi Shimodate ◽  
Motowo Mizuno ◽  
Hiroshi Takayama ◽  
Tomohiko Sunami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Different Characteristics

scholarly journals Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1757-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph JY Sung ◽  
Philip WY Chiu ◽  
Francis K L Chan ◽  
James YW Lau ◽  
Khean-lee Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains an important emergency condition, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. As endoscopic therapy is the ’gold standard' of management, treatment of these patients can be considered in three stages: pre-endoscopic treatment, endoscopic haemostasis and post-endoscopic management. Since publication of the Asia-Pacific consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) 7 years ago, there have been significant advancements in the clinical management of patients in all three stages. These include pre-endoscopy risk stratification scores, blood and platelet transfusion, use of proton pump inhibitors; during endoscopy new haemostasis techniques (haemostatic powder spray and over-the-scope clips); and post-endoscopy management by second-look endoscopy and medication strategies. Emerging techniques, including capsule endoscopy and Doppler endoscopic probe in assessing adequacy of endoscopic therapy, and the pre-emptive use of angiographic embolisation, are attracting new attention. An emerging problem is the increasing use of dual antiplatelet agents and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases. Guidelines on the discontinuation and then resumption of these agents in patients presenting with NVUGIB are very much needed. The Asia-Pacific Working Group examined recent evidence and recommends practical management guidelines in this updated consensus statement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document