311 DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF CLINICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE BY PROBE-BASED CONFOCAL ENDOMICROSCOPY AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1509-S-1510
Author(s):  
Adriana V. Safatle-Ribeiro ◽  
Carlos F. Marques ◽  
Clelma Batista Pires ◽  
Lívia Arraes ◽  
Luciana Meirelles ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Fekete ◽  
Alina-Simona Muntean ◽  
Stefan Hica ◽  
Alin Rancea ◽  
Liliana Resiga ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the rate andthe prognostic factors for down-staging and complete response for rectal adenocarcinoma after inductionchemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, and to analyze the rate of sphinctersaving surgery.Methods: We included from March 2011 to October 2013 a number of 88 patients hospitalized with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma in the Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Cluj. The treatment schedule included 2-4 cycles of Oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine followed by concomitant chemoradiation with a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions combined with a fluoropyrimidine monotherapy.Results:The rate of T down-staging was 49.4% (40/81 evaluable patients). Independent prognostic factors for T down-staging were: age >57 years (p<0.01), cN0 (p<0.01), distance from anal verge >5 cm (p<0.01), initial CEA <6.2 ng/ml (p<0.01), higher number of chemotherapy cycles with Oxaliplatin (pROC=0.05) and protraction of radiotherapy of >35 days (p<0.01). Nine patients from 81 (11.1%) presented complete response (7 pathological and 2 clinical); the independent prognostic factors were stage cT2 versus cT3-4 (p<0.01), initial tumor size ≤3.5 cm and distance from anal verge >5 cm (p=0.03). Sixty-eight patients (79.1%) underwent radical surgery and among them 35 patients (51.5 %) had a sphincter saving procedure.Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation produced important down-staging in rectal adenocarcinoma. Independent prognostic factors for T down-staging were: age, cN0, distance from anal verge, initial CEA, the number of Oxaliplatin cycles and duration of radiotherapy; for complete response: cT2, initial tumor size and distance from the anal verge. Abbreviations: 5FU: 5-fluorouracil; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; AV: anal verge; CAPOX: Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin; CCR: clinical complete response; CRT: chemoradiation; CTC4.0: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0; ECOG: Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group; EUS: endorectal ultrasound; FOLFOX: 5-fluorouracil plus Oxaliplatin; LARC: locally advanced rectal cancer; PCR: pathological complete response; PS: performance status; PTV: planning target volume; R0: Resection, 0 (microscopically clear resection margin); ROC curve: receiver operating characteristic curve; TME: total mesorectal excision; TRG: tumor regression grade.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00158
Author(s):  
Ashray Gunjur ◽  
Grace Chazan ◽  
Genni Newnham ◽  
Sue-Anne McLachlan

PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients’ tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1721-1723
Author(s):  
Rajesh S. Shinde ◽  
Ninad Katdare ◽  
Naveena A. N. Kumar ◽  
Rahul Bhamre ◽  
Ashwin Desouza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document