scholarly journals TATA box-mediated in vitro transcription by RNA polymerase III. Evidence for TATA-binding protein in a polymerase III type complex.

1993 ◽  
Vol 268 (2) ◽  
pp. 1141-1150
Author(s):  
M.T. Mitchell ◽  
P.A. Benfield
2013 ◽  
Vol 288 (38) ◽  
pp. 27564-27570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Verma ◽  
Ko-Hsuan Hung ◽  
Jin Joo Kang ◽  
Nermeen H. Barakat ◽  
William E. Stumph

In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, RNA polymerase III transcription was found to be dependent not upon the canonical TATA box-binding protein (TBP) but instead upon the TBP-related factor 1 (TRF1) (Takada, S., Lis, J. T., Zhou, S., and Tjian, R. (2000) Cell 101, 459–469). Here we confirm that transcription of fly tRNA genes requires TRF1. However, we unexpectedly find that U6 snRNA gene promoters are occupied primarily by TBP in cells and that knockdown of TBP, but not TRF1, inhibits U6 transcription in cells. Moreover, U6 transcription in vitro effectively utilizes TBP, whereas TBP cannot substitute for TRF1 to promote tRNA transcription in vitro. Thus, in fruit flies, different classes of RNA polymerase III promoters differentially utilize TBP and TRF1 for the initiation of transcription.


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2655-2665 ◽  
Author(s):  
J G Howe ◽  
M D Shu

The Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER) genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase III, but their transcription unit appears to contain both class II and class III promoter elements. One of these promoter element, a TATA-like box which we call the EBER TATA box, or ETAB, is located in a position typical for a class II TATA box but contains G/C residues in the normal T/A motif and a conserved thymidine doublet. Experiments using chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs and mutations in the TATA box of the adenovirus major late promoter showed that the ETAB promoter element does not substitute for a class II TATA box. However, when the ETAB promoter element sequence was changed to a class II TATA box consensus sequence, the EBER 2 gene was transcribed in vitro by both RNA polymerases II and III. From these results, we conclude that the ETAB promoter element is important for the exclusive transcription of the EBER 2 gene by RNA polymerase III.


2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (31) ◽  
pp. 32401-32406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane E. Alexander ◽  
David J. Kaczorowski ◽  
Amy J. Jackson-Fisher ◽  
Drew M. Lowery ◽  
Sara J. Zanton ◽  
...  

Transcription ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e27526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Dumay-Odelot ◽  
Stéphanie Durrieu-Gaillard ◽  
Leyla El Ayoubi ◽  
Camila Parrot ◽  
Martin Teichmann

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3278-3282
Author(s):  
D P Carlson ◽  
J Ross

A base substitution in the 5'-flanking region of a human fetal globin gene is associated with abnormal fetal hemoglobin production. It also reduces by 5- to 10-fold in vitro transcription of the gene by RNA polymerase III. We discuss potential links between polymerase III transcription and abnormal hemoglobin production.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
S A Shaaban ◽  
B M Krupp ◽  
B D Hall

In order to identify catalytically important amino acid changes within the second-largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerase III, we mutagenized selected regions of its gene (RET1) and devised in vivo assays for both increased and decreased transcription termination by this enzyme. Using as the reporter gene a mutant SUP4-o tRNA gene that in one case terminates prematurely and in the other case fails to terminate, we screened mutagenized RET1 libraries for reduced and increased transcription termination, respectively. The gain in suppression phenotype was in both cases scored as a reduction in the accumulation of red pigment in yeast strains harboring the ade2-1 ochre mutation. Termination-altering mutations were obtained in regions of the RET1 gene encoding amino acids 300 to 325, 455 to 486, 487 to 521, and 1061 to 1082 of the protein. In degree of amino acid sequence conservation, these range from highly variable in the first to highly conserved in the last two regions. Residues 300 to 325 yielded mainly reduced-termination mutants, while in region 1061 to 1082, increased-termination mutants were obtained exclusively. All mutants recovered, while causing gain of suppression with one SUP4 allele, brought about a reduction in suppression with the other allele, thus confirming that the phenotype is due to altered termination rather than an elevated level of transcription initiation. In vitro transcription reactions performed with extracts from several strong mutants demonstrated that the mutant polymerases respond to RNA terminator sequences in a manner that matches their in vivo termination phenotypes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3771-3781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Li ◽  
James L. Manley

ABSTRACT The Drosophila homeodomain protein Even-skipped (Eve) is a transcriptional repressor, and previous studies have suggested that it functions by interfering with the basal transcription machinery. Here we describe experiments indicating that the mechanism of Eve repression involves a direct interaction with the TATA binding protein (TBP) that blocks binding of TBP-TFIID to the promoter. We first compared Eve activities in in vitro transcription systems reconstituted with either all the general transcription factors or only TBP, TFIIB, TFIIF30, and RNA polymerase II. In each case, equivalent and very efficient levels of repression were observed, indicating that no factors other than those in the minimal system are required for repression. We then show that Eve can function efficiently when its recognition sites are far from the promoter and that the same regions of Eve required for repression in vivo are necessary and sufficient for in vitro repression. This includes, in addition to an Ala-Pro-rich region, residues within the homeodomain. Using GAL4-Eve fusion proteins, we demonstrate that the homeodomain plays a role in repression in addition to DNA binding, which is to facilitate interaction with TBP. Single-round transcription experiments indicate that Eve must function prior to TBP binding to the promoter, suggesting a mechanism whereby Eve represses by competing with the TATA box for TBP binding. Consistent with this, excess TATA box-containing oligonucleotide is shown to specifically and efficiently disrupt the TBP-Eve interaction. Importantly, we show that Eve binds directly to TFIID and that this interaction can also be disrupted by the TATA oligonucleotide. We conclude that Eve represses transcription via a direct interaction with TBP that blocks TFIID binding to the promoter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document