Dual system theory of the biological clock

1985 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley D. Beck
2021 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 101945
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Katz ◽  
Hadar Naftalovich ◽  
Kathryn Matanky ◽  
Iftah Yovel

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 3050-3067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofir Turel ◽  
Hamed Qahri-Saremi

Unplanned (i.e. spontaneous) online behaviors such as impulsive use of social networking sites (SNS) and swearing on SNS are prevalent and can adversely affect users and society. Drawing on dual system theory, this article conceptualizes and empirically investigates the etiology of such behaviors. Results of two studies ( n1 = 295 SNS users, focuses on impulsive use; n2 = 336 SNS users, focuses on swearing) show that both of these online behaviors are driven, in part, by cognitive-emotional preoccupation with the SNS and inhibited, in part, by cognitive-behavioral control over using the SNS. The inhibition effect is both direct and indirect, through the suppression of the cognitive-emotional preoccupation effects. The findings provide a theoretical lens of analysis through which impulsive and unitneded media use behaviors can be explained.


Author(s):  
Andreas B. Eder ◽  
David Dignath

AbstractHundred years ago, Kurt Lewin published a series of articles in which he vehemently argued against the idea that associations between stimuli and responses motivate behavior. This article reviews his empirical work and theory and the cogency of Lewin’s conclusion according to modern standards. We conclude that Lewin’s criticism of the contiguity principle of associationism is still valid, and is now supported by a broad range of theories on learning, motivation, and action control. Implications for modern dual-system theory and modern theories on motivated action and (instructed) task sets are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHANG Hui ◽  
MA Hong-yu ◽  
XU Fu-ming ◽  
LIU Yanjun ◽  
Shi Yan-wei
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 241 (5) ◽  
pp. R322-R329 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Skopik ◽  
M. Takeda ◽  
C. W. Holyoke

Beck's dual system theory (DST) is examined theoretically and experimentally by investigating the oviposition rhythm of Ostrinia nubilalis and its entrainment by light cycles. Several well-known circadian phenomena are not accounted for by the DST. 1) It does not generate transient cycles when light pulses fall during the advance portion of the circadian cycle. This is also reflected in DST-predicted phase-response curves (PRC's) for both Drosophila pseudoobscura and O. nubilalis. Steady-state phase advances are predicted to occur on day 1 after the light pulses by the DST, not several cycles later as has been observed in many cases. 2) It does not account for the observation that the magnitude of a phase shift (delta phi) is often a function of pulse duration of both delays and advances. The DST predicts the same + delta phi, for example, for a 0.5-h and a 6.0-h light pulse beginning 5.0 h after dusk. 3) The DST does not accurately predict steady-state phase relationships between the light cycle and the gating oscillation (P-system) in non-24-h light cycles. 4) The driver (S-system) is given the property of being temperature sensitive whereas the driven rhythm (P-system) is temperature compensated. This is contrary to accumulated data suggesting that the circadian pacemaker is temperature compensated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document