A COMPARISON OF AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER PATHOLOGIC STAGE T2a VERSUS T2b UROTHELIAL CANCER: ANALYSIS OF PATIENT OUTCOMES IN ORGAN CONFINED BLADDER CANCER

2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 579-579
Author(s):  
Kelly J Boudreaux ◽  
Peter E Clark ◽  
William T Lowrance ◽  
Jon A Rumohr ◽  
Daniel A Barocas ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 546-546
Author(s):  
Kelly J Boudreaux ◽  
Sam S Chang ◽  
William T Lowrance ◽  
Jon A Rumohr ◽  
Daniel A Barocas ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 540-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly J. Boudreaux ◽  
Peter E. Clark ◽  
William T. Lowrance ◽  
Jon A. Rumohr ◽  
Daniel A. Barocas ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 770-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly J. Boudreaux ◽  
Sam S. Chang ◽  
William T. Lowrance ◽  
Jon A. Rumohr ◽  
Daniel A. Barocas ◽  
...  

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1169
Author(s):  
Hiroki Ide ◽  
Hiroshi Miyamoto

There have been critical problems in the non-surgical treatment for bladder cancer, especially residence to intravesical pharmacotherapy, including BCG immunotherapy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence has suggested a vital role of sex steroid hormone-mediated signaling in the progression of urothelial cancer. Moreover, activation of the androgen receptor and estrogen receptor pathways has been implicated in modulating sensitivity to conventional non-surgical therapy for bladder cancer. This may indicate the possibility of anti-androgenic and anti-estrogenic drugs, apart from their direct anti-tumor activity, to function as sensitizers of such conventional treatment. This article summarizes available data suggesting the involvement of sex hormone receptors, such as androgen receptor, estrogen receptor-α, and estrogen receptor-β, in the progression of urothelial cancer, focusing on their modulation for the efficacy of conventional therapy, and discusses their potential of overcoming therapeutic resistance.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110616
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Gianluca Perego ◽  
Ivano Vavassori ◽  
Andrea Luciani

In urothelial cancer of the bladder, the introduction of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors represents progress in the management of the disease’s early and advanced stages. In particular, recent studies have implemented these drugs in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In some studies, patients received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors alone (PURE and ABACUS) to treat muscle invasive bladder cancer, whereas other studies provided this therapy to cisplatin-ineligible patients. Furthermore, a large Phase III study (CheckMate 247) compared placebo with adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with high-risk urothelial cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or surgery alone. Despite some uncertain niches (nonbladder, PD-L1-negative tumors, and node-negative resected cancers), certain biological opportunities (exploring new targets, evaluating in vivo pathologic response, focusing on biomarkers for response) and clinical uses (avoiding chemotherapy at all or in frail patients, attaining similar pathologic complete response rates as in cisplatin-based chemotherapy) are valid reasons for incorporating these agents into the therapeutic armamentarium of medical uro-oncologists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document