229: A Co-Morbidity Adjusted Life Expectancy Tool for use in the Urology Clinic

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 77-77
Author(s):  
Patti Groome ◽  
D. Robert Siemens ◽  
William J. MacKillop ◽  
Michael Brundage ◽  
Jun Kawakami ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Albertsen ◽  
Dennis G. Fryback ◽  
Barry E. Storer ◽  
Thomas F. Kolon ◽  
Judith Fine

1996 ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Albertsen ◽  
Dennis G. Fryback ◽  
Barry E. Storer ◽  
Thomas F. Kolon ◽  
Judith Fine

Haemophilia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 853-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. MAUSER-BUNSCHOTEN ◽  
D. E. FRANSEN VAN DE PUTTE ◽  
R. E. G. SCHUTGENS
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-208
Author(s):  
D. Schiavone ◽  
A. D'Amico ◽  
V. Ficarra ◽  
S. Cicuto

An ageing population is mainly due to the reduction of births and the increase in life expectation. In Italy the percentage of people aged at least 65 years increased from 11.3% in 1971 to 15.3% in 1991. This increase mostly involved those aged 75 years and over. In the last four decades the average life span has extended by more than 11 years (from 65.5 to 76.9 years). The average life span in women is currently 80.2 years, almost 7 years longer than that of men. As age increases so does the incidence of various urological diseases requiring surgery, such as prostatic diseases (hyperplasia and carcinoma), urological tumours, urinary infections and incontinence. At the same time the probability of associated pathologies increases and consequently the risk of peri-operative complications, thus negatively influencing the prognosis. Surgery is only indicated in the elderly when it may increase life expectancy and/or improve the quality of life. A careful pre-operative evaluation of all the factors that may influence both life expectancy and quality of life is therefore indispensable, with particular reference to the actual disease and co-morbidity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4577-4577
Author(s):  
B. Konety ◽  
J. Cowan ◽  
J. Duchane ◽  
P. Carroll

4577 Background: It is generally acknowledged that men who are most likely to derive benefit from therapy for prostate cancer are those with a life expectancy of greater than 10 years. We examined the patterns of primary treatment for prostate cancer in men ≥75 years of age who would have a life expectancy of approximately 10 years. Methods: We examined data from the multi-institutional CaPSURE database on type of primary therapy received for prostate cancer in men < and ≥75 years. Primary therapy was defined as watchful waiting (WW), radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy (BT), BT plus external beam radiotherapy (BT+EBRT), EBRT or primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT). Chi square tests and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of type of primary therapy. Results: The median age of the entire population (n = 10,764) was 67 years and 18% of the dataset were patients ≥75 years. A greater proportion of patients ≥75 years were white, single, had multiple co-morbidities, had low income and low education levels and were classified as high risk (43% vs. 25%) compared to those <75 years. Men ≥75 years were more likely to have received EBRT, PADT or WW (all p < .01). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for socio-demographic factors, diagnostic risk category, and number of co-morbidities at diagnosis, patients ≥75 years were less likely to be managed with primary therapy than with WW regardless of risk category or level of co-morbidity: BT (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.15–0.31), BT/EBRT (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.16–0.28), EBRT (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.22–0.37), PADT (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.51–0.81), and RP (OR 0.01, 95%CI 0.01–0.02). Conclusions: Older patients are far more likely to received WW as primary therapy regardless of burden of co-morbidity or risk level of primary cancer. A more tailored approach to prostate cancer therapy taking into account co-morbidity and functional level to decide primary therapy may be more appropriate in elderly men. Well selected older patients with high risk disease, particularly those with low co-morbidity levels, may derive survival benefit from primary therapy other than WW. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Baumert ◽  
E von der Lippe ◽  
R Paprott ◽  
Y Du ◽  
L Reitzle ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While life expectancy (LE) is rising, years lived with severe health impairments especially due to chronic diseases also increase. Diabetes is one of the major chronic diseases with high potential for co-morbidity and premature deaths needing life-long care. Therefore, information about loss in LE and healthy life years (HLY) in people with diabetes compared to people without diabetes is essential for assessing the burden of diabetes. Methods Data on all-cause mortality rates for the general population of Germany in 2014 was drawn from the Federal Statistical Office; mortality rate ratios for people with diabetes compared to people without diabetes were based on claims data from about 70 million people covered by statutory health insurances in 2014. Data of three nationwide health telephone surveys conducted among adults in Germany 2009-2012 (n ∼ 60,000) were used to assess severe health impairments defined as self-reported limitations in daily activities due to diseases for at least six months in people with and without diabetes. Based on these figures, estimates on LE and HLY could be calculated by sex and 5-year age-groups for people with and without diabetes aged ≥ 30 years. Results In both sexes and in all 5-year age-groups, LE and HLY were substantially lower for people with than for people without diabetes. For example, among women in the age group 30-34 years, LE and HLY estimates were 48.0 and 36.4 years for those with diabetes compared to 54.9 and 47.6 years for those without diabetes; in men, these figures were estimated as 42.6 and 32.4 years for those with diabetes compared to 50.3 and 44.1 years for those without diabetes. Differences in LE and HLY between people with and without diabetes attenuated with increasing age. Conclusions The present study revealed substantial reductions in LE and HLY related to diabetes and underlines the importance of integrating both figures in a national diabetes surveillance. Key messages There are substantial differences in life expectancy and healthy life years between people with and without diabetes. Specific intervention and prevention activities should be implemented to tackle disability in persons with diabetes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Han ◽  
Blake Noennig ◽  
Jonathan Pavlinec ◽  
Liana Damiano ◽  
Sharon Lo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 131-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Wafz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Aldo M. Bocciardi ◽  
Sascha Ahyai ◽  
Paul Perrotta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document