scholarly journals Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1143-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Backus ◽  
Martin S. Banks ◽  
Raymond van Ee ◽  
James A. Crowell
Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3440 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1323-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M Berends ◽  
Raymond van Ee ◽  
Casper J Erkelens

It has been well established that vertical disparity is involved in perception of the three-dimensional layout of a visual scene. The goal of this paper was to examine whether vertical disparities can alter perceived direction. We dissociated the common relationship between vertical disparity and the stimulus direction by applying a vertical magnification to the image presented to one eye. We used a staircase paradigm to measure whether perceived straight-ahead depended on the amount of vertical magnification in the stimulus. Subjects judged whether a test dot was flashed to either the left or the right side of straight-ahead. We found that perceived straight-ahead did indeed depend on the amount of vertical magnification but only after subjects adapted (for 5 min) to vertical scale (and only in five out of nine subjects). We argue that vertical disparity is a factor in the calibration of the relationship between eye-position signals and perceived direction.


Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
B T Backus ◽  
R van Ee ◽  
M S Banks

Vertical magnification in one eye causes a frontoparallel surface to appear slanted about a vertical axis. Stenton, Frisby, and Mayhew [1984 Nature (London)309 622 – 623] showed using a dot display that, for mixtures of dots drawn from two populations of vertical magnification, the amount of horizontal magnification needed to null the perceive slant varies monotonically and nearly linearly with the mixture. We find a similar, but weaker, relationship for mixtures of horizontal magnification. In one experiment, a horizontal row of dots (containing no vertical disparity) was used to measure the local horizontal magnification needed to null the slant-biasing effect of a background which consisted of a pair of transparent planes made up of dots from two populations of horizontal magnification. The nulling magnification for the dot row was generally a monotonic function of the ratio of the number of dots from the two populations. In a second experiment, observers added horizontal disparity to the biplanar display itself until one plane appeared frontoparallel. The nulling horizontal magnification was again a monotonic function of the ratio of the number of dots from the two populations. We conclude that stereoscopic slant perception is influenced by pooling both of vertical and of horizontal magnifications within a stereoscopic image.


Author(s):  
Myron L. Braunstein ◽  
John W. Payne
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1910-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Salvaggio ◽  
Nicolas Masson ◽  
Michael Andres

Author(s):  
Seok Lee ◽  
Juyong Park ◽  
Dongkyung Nam

In this article, the authors present an image processing method to reduce three-dimensional (3D) crosstalk for eye-tracking-based 3D display. Specifically, they considered 3D pixel crosstalk and offset crosstalk and applied different approaches based on its characteristics. For 3D pixel crosstalk which depends on the viewer’s relative location, they proposed output pixel value weighting scheme based on viewer’s eye position, and for offset crosstalk they subtracted luminance of crosstalk components according to the measured display crosstalk level in advance. By simulations and experiments using the 3D display prototypes, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of proposed method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document