Role of the parasympathetic pupillomotor system in classically conditioned pupillary dilation of the cat

1978 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Ashe ◽  
Carol L. Cooper ◽  
Norman M. Weinberger
2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Aksenov ◽  
N. A. Serdyukova ◽  
J. R. Bloedel ◽  
V. Bracha

The cerebellar interposed nuclei (IN) are critical components of a neural network that controls the expression of classically conditioned eyeblinks. The IN receive 2 major inputs: the massive, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–mediated input from the Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex and the relatively weaker, glutamate-mediated input from collaterals of mossy and climbing fiber cerebellar afferent systems. To elucidate the role of IN glutamate neurotransmission in conditioned response (CR) expression, effects of blocking fast glutamatergic neurotransmission in the IN with γ-d-glutamylglycine (DGG) on the expression of conditioned eyeblinks and on cerebellar nuclear neuronal activity were examined. Surprisingly, blocking fast glutamate receptors in the IN did not abolish CRs. DGG decreased CR incidence and slightly increased CR latency. In contrast, identical amounts of DGG applied to the cerebellar cortex abolished CRs. Similar to the behavioral effects, DGG had unexpectedly mild effects on IN neurons. At the population level, the baseline firing frequency of IN cells was not affected. After DGG injections, the incidence of excitatory modulation of cell activity in the interstimulus interval decreased but was not abolished. A combined block of fast glutamate and GABAA neurotransmission using a mixture of DGG and picrotoxin dramatically reduced CR incidence, increased the firing frequency of all cell types, and virtually abolished all modulation of neuronal activity. These results indicate that fast glutamate neurotransmission in the IN plays only an accessory role both in the expression of behavioral CRs and in the generation of associated neuronal activity in the IN.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Katharina Franke ◽  
Stephan F Miedl ◽  
Sarah K. Danböck ◽  
Michael Liedlgruber ◽  
Markus Grill ◽  
...  

Psychological trauma is typically accompanied by physical pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often co-occurs with chronic pain. Clinical reports suggest that pain in the aftermath of trauma may be part of a re-experiencing symptomatology. Previously, we demonstrated that classical conditioning can underlie visual re-experiencing since intrusions appear to occur as conditioned responses (CRs) to trauma-related cues. Possibly, classical conditioning also plays a role in re-experiencing of pain. However, this hypothesis has so far remained untested. Sixty-five participants underwent classical conditioning, where painful electrical stimulation and highly aversive film-clips served as unconditioned stimuli (USs) in a 2 (pain/no pain) x 2 (aversive/neutral film) design. Conditioned stimuli (CSs) were neutral pictures depicting contextual details from the films. One day later, participants were re-exposed to CSs during a memory-triggering-task (MTT). Pain-CRs were assessed by self-report and an fMRI-based marker of nociceptive pain, the neurologic pain signature (NPS).During conditioning, pain-signaling CSs elicited more self-reported pain and NPS responses than no-pain-signaling CSs. Self-reported pain-CRs but not NPS CRs recurred 24h later when participants were re-exposed to CSs during MTT. Both during acquisition and MTT, the aversive affective film-context blurred the difference in participants´ pain-reports to pain-signaling and no-pain-signaling CSs.Our data support the hypothesis that pain can emerge as a classically conditioned response. Pain as a CR to pain-signaling cues could represent an instance of pain re-experiencing in PTSD. Possibly, this mechanism may perpetuate pain beyond tissue healing and thereby explain the comorbidity between chronic pain and PTSD.


1989 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaylan Sheila Turkkan

AbstractConverging data from different disciplines are showing the role of classical conditioning processes in the elaboration of human and animal behavior to be larger than previously supposed. Restricted views of classically conditioned responses as merely secretory, reflexive, or emotional are giving way to a broader conception that includes problem-solving, and other rule-governed behavior thought to be the exclusive province of either operant conditiońing or cognitive psychology. These new views have been accompanied by changes in the way conditioning is conducted and evaluated. Data from a number of seemingly unrelated phenomena such as relapse to drug abuse by postaddicts, the placebo effect, and the immune response appear to involve classical conditioning processes. Classical conditioning, moreover, has been found to occur in simpler and simpler organisms and recently even demonstrated in brain slices and in utero. This target article will integrate the several research areas that have used the classical conditioning process as an explanatory model; it will challenge teleological interpretations of the classically conditioned CR and offer some basic principles for testing conditioning in diverse areas.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document