Signaling inhibition with radiation in colorectal cancer: Clinical trials

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3 Suppl 6) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Gillies McKenna ◽  
Ruth J. Muschel ◽  
Anjali Gupta ◽  
Stephen Hahn ◽  
Eric J. Bernhard
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13522-13522
Author(s):  
R. B. Catalano ◽  
R. L. Comis ◽  
M. J. O’Connell

13522 Background: The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened the GI Scientific Leadership Council (GI SLC) to provide leadership in establishing and advancing national research priorities for colorectal cancer clinical trials. A key objective was to complement and enhance the scientific programs of the NCI-sponsored GI Intergroup. Methods: A multidisciplinary group of investigators representing the spectrum of diagnostic, therapeutic, and laboratory disciplines engaged in colorectal cancer clinical research was convened in December 2004 to address the most important research opportunities in colorectal cancer, and clinical trials to address those opportunities. In April 2005, the concepts evolved were discussed with representatives of the patient advocate community and the pharmaceutical industry. In December 2005 the GI SLC presented its core research recommendations to more than 100 members of the cancer community. Results: Seven principal cross-cutting themes emerged, as well as ten strategic recommendations to be addressed over the next three years. A portfolio of high priority clinical trials was identified. The GI SLC has prioritized support for three colon cancer surgical adjuvant trials; two rectal cancer surgical adjuvant trials; two colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver trials; two metastatic colorectal trials; and one colon polyp and cancer detection study trial. These will be detailed in our presentation. Conclusions:The GI Scientific Leadership Council represents a novel approach to strengthen colorectal cancer clinical trials and correlative science research in the United States by providing a platform to bring together clinical investigators and translational researchers, the patient advocate community, and the pharmaceutical industry. The GI SLC plans to convene a Cancer Prevention Advisory Group in the first quarter of 2006 and plans to initiate one or more innovative clinical trials in collaboration with industry in 2006. The GI SLC will meet throughout 2006 to develop action plans, review progress towards those plans, and facilitate adoption of the research priorities across the cancer community. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 104308
Author(s):  
Nansu Zong ◽  
Daniel J. Stone ◽  
Deepak K. Sharma ◽  
Andrew Wen ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Batist ◽  
S. Michaud ◽  
D. P. Richards ◽  
F. Servidio-Italiano ◽  
B. D. Stein

Background Colorectal Cancer Canada, in partnership with a Scientific Advisory Committee, is developing a Canadian Patient Group Pathway to Accessing Cancer Clinical Trials (“Pathway”). A central element of the Pathway is presented here—namely, a set of recommendations and tools aimed at each stakeholder group.Methods A summary of the peer-reviewed and grey literature informed discussions at a meeting, held in June 2017, in which a cross-section of stakeholders reached consensus on the potential roles of patient groups in the cancer clinical trials process, barriers to accessing cancer clinical trials, best practice models for patient-group integration, and a process for developing the Pathway. Canadian recommendations and tools were subsequently developed by a small working group and reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Committee.Results The major output of the consensus conference was agreement that the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (ctti) model, successfully applied in the United States, could be adapted to create a Canadian Pathway. Two main differences between the Canadian and American cancer clinical research environments were highlighted: the effects of global decision-making and systems of regulatory and funding approvals. The working group modified the ctti model to incorporate those aspects and to reflect Canadian stakeholder organizations and how they currently interact with patient groups.Conclusions Developing and implementing a Canadian Pathway that incorporates the concepts of multistakeholder collaboration and the inclusion of patient groups as equal partners is expected to generate significant benefits for all stakeholders. The next steps to bring forward a proposed Pathway will involve engaging the broader cancer research community. Clinical trial sponsors will be encouraged to adopt a Charter recognizing the importance of including patient groups, and to support the training of patient groups through an independent body to ensure quality research partners. Integration of patient groups into the process of developing “real world” evidence will be advanced by a further consensus meeting being organized by Colorectal Cancer Canada for 6–7 November 2018.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005-1013
Author(s):  
Doreen A. Ezeife ◽  
Sunil Parimi ◽  
Ellen R. Cusano ◽  
Matthew K. Smith ◽  
Tony H. Truong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nansu Zong ◽  
Andrew Wen ◽  
Daniel J. Stone ◽  
Deepak K. Sharma ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is emerging as a next-generation standards framework developed by HL7 for exchanging electronic health care data. The modeling capability of FHIR in standardizing cancer data has been gaining increasing attention by the cancer research informatics community. However, few studies have been conducted to examine the capability of FHIR in electronic data capture (EDC) applications for effective cancer clinical trials. The objective of this study was to design, develop, and evaluate an FHIR-based method that enables the automation of the case report forms (CRFs) population for cancer clinical trials using real-world electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed an FHIR-based computational pipeline of EDC with a case study for modeling colorectal cancer trials. We first leveraged an existing FHIR-based cancer profile to represent EHR data of patients with colorectal cancer, and then we used the FHIR Questionnaire and QuestionnaireResponse resources to represent the CRFs and their data population. To test the accuracy of and overall quality of the computational pipeline, we used synoptic reports of 287 Mayo Clinic patients with colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2019 with standard measures of precision, recall, and F1 score. RESULTS Using the computational pipeline, a total of 1,037 synoptic reports were successfully converted as the instances of the FHIR-based cancer profile. The average accuracy for converting all data elements (excluding tumor perforation) of the cancer profile was 0.99, using 200 randomly selected records. The average F1 score for populating nine questions of the CRFs in a real-world colorectal cancer trial was 0.95, using 100 randomly selected records. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that it is feasible to populate CRFs with EHR data in an automated manner with satisfactory performance. The outcome of the study provides helpful insight into future directions in implementing FHIR-based EDC applications for modern cancer clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Brett Traxler ◽  
Corbin Walters ◽  
Mopileola Tomi Adewumi ◽  
Chase Meyer ◽  
Madison Puckett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document