Kinetics of anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in batch and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 194
2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Rodrı́guez-Martı́nez ◽  
Ivan Rodrı́guez-Garza ◽  
Estaban Pedraza-Flores ◽  
Nagamani Balagurusamy ◽  
Gerardo Sosa-Santillan ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert H. P. Fang ◽  
Chui Ho-Kwong ◽  
Li Yu-You

The microstructure of anaerobic biogranules treating a wide variety of wastewaters was investigated using light and scanning electron microscopies. Biogranules were sampled from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors treating wastewater individually containing formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, peptone, sucrose, starch, benzoate, brewery and monosodium glutamate. Results indicated that the microstructure of the biogranules was strongly dependent on the degradation kinetics of substrates. Anaerobic degradation is a multi-step process, involving fermentation/acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. For substrates, such as carbohydrates, of which the initial step of degradation was considerably faster than the subsequent degradation of intermediates, biogranules developed a layered microstructure. On the other hand, for substrates, such as proteins, of which the initial step of degradation was rate-limiting, a uniform microstructure would be developed. These findings are of significance for the development of kinetic models for biogranule and biofilm.


1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. P. Fang ◽  
D. Wai-Chung Chung

Experiments were conducted in two 2.8 liter UASB (upflow anaerobic sludge blanket) reactors treating proteinaceous wastewaters at 37° and 55°C with 9 hours of hydraulic retention. Results showed that the mesophilic reactor consistently removed 83.5-85.1% of COD (chemical oxygen demand) at loading rates ranging 8-22 g COD l−1 d−1 (corresponding to 3000-8250 mg l−1 of proteinaceous COD in wastewater), whereas the thermophilic reactor removed only 68.5-82.7%. At 32 g COD l−1 d−1 (i.e. 12000 mg COD l−1), the removal efficiencies were lowered to 75.7% in the mesophilic reactor and 65.1% in the thermophilic reactor. At 42 g COD l−1 d−1, severe sludge washout occurred in the mesophilic reactor; at the same loading rate, the thermophilic reactor removed only 53.8% of COD even though sludge washout was under control. The degradation rate in the both reactors was limited by the initial hydrolysis of proteins. However, batch tests showed that thermophilic sludge had slightly higher methanogenic activities than mesophilic sludge in treating proteins and intermediate acids, except propionate. The sludge yields in mesophilic and thermophilic reactors were 0.066 and 0.099 g VSS g COD−1, respectively. Observations by scanning electron microscopy indicated that both types of sludge granules were of irregular shape. There was little noticeable difference between the two granules; both had neither a layered microstructure nor a predominant bacterial species.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Makni ◽  
F. Bettaieb ◽  
H. Dhaouadi ◽  
F. M'Henni ◽  
A. Bakhrouf

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 877-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mijalova Nacheva ◽  
M. Reyes Pantoja ◽  
E. A. Lomelí Serrano

The performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor operated at ambient temperature (20.9–25.2°C) was analysed for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater previously pre-treated for solid separation. The experimental work was carried out in a reactor with 15 L effective volume. Four organic loads were applied and the process performance was evaluated. The COD removal rate increased with the load rise from 4 to 15 kg COD.m−3.d−1. Removal efficiencies of 90% were obtained with a load of 15 kg COD.m−3.d−1. The entrapment of suspended solids in the sludge blanket was greater in proportion during the first two stages due to the low upflow velocities used when loads of 4 and 7 kg COD.m−3.d−1 were evaluated. This phenomenon did not affect the structure of the biological grains or their methanogenic activity. More than 50% of the organic nitrogen was degraded, causing a 3% increase of ammonia concentration. The concentrations of the volatile fatty acids were not high and the wastewater alkalinity was enough to prevent acidification. The yield coefficient of methane production increased with the load rise, reaching 0.266 m3/kg CODremoved at 15 kg COD.m−3.d−1 organic load. The UASB reactor is a good option for the biological treatment of pre-treated slaughterhouse wastewater. However, additional treatment is required in order to accomplish the water quality requirements in discharges to water bodies.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 805-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siriuma Jawjit ◽  
Winai Liengcharernsit

This study aims to investigate treatment performance of the two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) applied to concentrated latex processing wastewater in Thailand. First, optimal conditions including the hydraulic retention time (HRT) in the acid tank and the UASB tank, pH, and temperature (mesophilic and thermophilic) were determined. It was found that the HRT at 24 h and 48 h were the optimal HRT for the acid tank and the UASB tank, respectively. The pH of the system should be controlled at 7 to prevent rubber coagulation and to achieve high treatment performance, and the mesophilic condition (35°C) was found to be the optimal temperature. Second, the two-stage UASB was applied with the optimal conditions mentioned earlier with real wastewater at a latex mill. It was found that methane production was about 0.116 L CH4/g COD removed (16.3–22.8 m3CH4/d), and average chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids (SS) removal efficiency were about 82% and 92%, respectively. In case of SS removal, the results revealed that the two-stage UASB was capable of overcoming the limitations of the single-stage UASB in treating concentrated latex effluent. The results indicated that application of the two-stage UASB to concentrated latex processing wastewater is feasible. Nevertheless, combination with other treatment systems (e.g., oxidation pond, aerated lagoon) is necessary to meet Thailand's industrial effluent standards (in the case of COD).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document