Effects of added bioactive glass on the setting and mechanical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement

Biomaterials ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 3061-3067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ika Dewi Ana ◽  
Shigeki Matsuya ◽  
Michio Ohta ◽  
Kunio Ishikawa
2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 874-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne LAGARDE ◽  
Philippe FRANCOIS ◽  
Stéphane LE GOFF ◽  
Jean-Pierre ATTAL ◽  
Elisabeth DURSUN

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua E ◽  
Masao IRIE ◽  
Noriyuki NAGAOKA ◽  
Takashi YAMASHIRO ◽  
Kazuomi SUZUKI

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Diana Setya Ningsih

Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a material that can release fluoride to prevent caries especially in primary teeth. One of the developments of glass ionomer cement in the world of pediatry dentistry is resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). The resin-modified glass ionomer cement were still maintaining the clinical advantages oforiginal material, such as fluoride realease, good compatibility and aestehetically. The mechanical properties of rmgic is more higher than gic. These materials have a better adhesion, higher moisture resistance, and a longer shelft life. This paper review aims to know the ability RMGIC as alternative restorative material for primary teeth.


Author(s):  
Alireza Valanezhad ◽  
Tetsuro Odatsu ◽  
Koichi Udoh ◽  
Takanobu Shiraishi ◽  
Takashi Sawase ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ika Dewi Ana

AbstractHybridization of resin modified- glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and bioactive glass (BAG) may result higher mechanical strength and resistance to disintegration, while less contain of polyacrylic acid would lead to bioactivity of the cement. In the present study we investigated the effect of BAG from the CaSiO3-Ca3(PO4)2 system addition to the bioactivity of RMGIC. The BAG containing 10, 15, and 20% of P2O5 (denoted as CSP10, 15, and 20) were used in the study to modify the powder of RMGIC, with apatite wollastonite (AWG) was chosen for a comparison. The surface bioactivity was assessed using XRD, FT-IR, and SEM analysis after specimen immersion in the simulated body fluid (SBF). Measurement of Ca, P, F, Sr, and Al was conducted for the remaining SBF. Cells studies were done to evaluate cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation on the RMGIC containing BAG compared to the one without BAG. Results of Sr and Al analysis lead to the conclusion that addition of BAG may not influence stability of the matrix of the cement. It was also confirmed that addition of bioactive glass was positive factor indicating excellent ions exchange in SBF and spontaneous growth of apatite by consuming the Ca and P ions in the surrounding fluid. The ability of osteoblasts differentiation on the four types of bioactive cements were higher than that of RMGIC without BAG. These results might provide novel insights into the development of a new generation of osteoconductive biomedical materials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document