OP08 High dose (HD-AraC) vs standard dose cytosine arabinoside (SD-AraC) during induction in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): Impact on stem cell mobilization after consolidation and on autologous transplantation (AML-12 trial)

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S34-S35
Author(s):  
R. Willemze ◽  
S. Suciu ◽  
F. Mandelli ◽  
T. de Witte ◽  
B. Labar ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1583-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilmarie Rodriguez ◽  
Peter M. Anderson ◽  
Mark R. Litzow ◽  
Linda Erlandson ◽  
Barbara A. Trotz ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Capizzi ◽  
R Davis ◽  
B Powell ◽  
J Cuttner ◽  
R R Ellison ◽  
...  

One hundred ninety-five adult patients with refractory or first relapse acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were randomly assigned to receive high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC), 3 g/m2 as a three-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 12 hours for four doses, followed by 6,000 IU/m2 asparaginase (ASNase) administered at hour 42, or HiDAC without ASNase. Treatment was repeated on day 8. The median patient age was 52 years. There was an overall superior complete remission (CR) rate for HiDAC/ASNase (40%) v HiDAC (24%), P = .02. Subset analysis according to prior response and age showed the following CR rates: 54% from HiDAC/ASNase treatment of refractory AML in patients less than 60 years, and 31% in patients greater than 60 years; CR from HiDAC in the same refractory groups were 18% (less than 60) and 0% (greater than 60); 37% from HiDAC/ASNase treatment of relapsed AML in patients less than 60 years, and 43% in patients greater than 60 years; CRs from HiDAC in the same relapsed groups were 33% (less than 60) and 21% (greater than 60). Toxicity in the two treatment arms was comparable and consisted primarily of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mild hepatic dysfunction, diarrhea, conjunctivitis and serositis, and hyperglycemia. There was only one case of transient cerebellar toxicity and no cutaneous toxicity. Median time to full hematologic recovery was 5 weeks. There was an overall survival benefit for patients treated with HiDAC/ASNase (19.6 weeks) compared with HiDAC (15.9 weeks), P = .046, primarily attributable to effects in refractory patients. Median time to failure for refractory patients who achieved CR was 38.5 weeks with HiDAC/ASNase, and 13.3 weeks for those treated with HiDAC. For relapsed patients in CR from HiDAC/ASNase the median time to failure was 17.7 weeks and 18.3 weeks for HiDAC. The overall 42% CR rate from HiDAC/ASNase v 12% from HiDAC in patients with refractory AML indicates that HiDAC/ASNase is not cross-resistant with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) and anthracyclines. We conclude that HiDAC/ASNase has substantial activity in poor-prognosis AML and that this combination warrants further trials in earlier stage disease.


Cancer ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald S. Walters ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
William K. Plunkett ◽  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 609-609
Author(s):  
Roelof Willemze ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Franco Mandelli ◽  
T.M. de Witte ◽  
Boris Labar ◽  
...  

Abstract The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of EORTC-LG and GIMEMA assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/m2/12 hrs for 4 days) with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm for 10 days) with the same drugs. Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) received consolidation (Co) consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin. Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization was performed after Co in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2. From 9 1999 till 7 2006, 1675 AML pts (APL excluded), age <61 years, from 67 centers (23 EORTC-LG and 44 GIMEMA) entered. Currently 1571 pts have been randomized for induction and 429 pts post-Co. During the induction toxicity was similar in the 2 arms except for conjunctivitis: 6% (HD-AraC) vs 0% (SD-AraC). HD-AraC given in the induction had no impact on the organ toxicity during Co but platelet recovery (> 50x109/l) was longer (median 4.0 vs 3.3 weeks; P=0.01). Among 886 pts randomized until 7 2005 by EORTC centers and 6 large GIMEMA centers, median follow-up of 2.5 years, 815 were evaluable for response. Out of 643 pts who reached CR, 57 went off study (toxicity, early progression). Among the remaining 586 who received Co, 37 could not be evaluated (early death/relapse, too early) and 549 were still CR after Co: 297 pts had no donor/no sibling, 197 had a donor and 55 were not typed. In these 3 groups the present estimates of the SCT rates are: 63% (auto-SCT), 71% (allo-SCT) and 69% (auto-SCT), resp. The 2.5-yr DFS rates (SE%) were 45% (3%), 61% (4%), and 67% (7%), resp. In pts < 50 yrs, 216 pts had no donor/no sibling, 135 had a donor and 14 have not been typed. For the first 2 groups, the 2.5 yr DFS rates (SE%) were 50% (4%) vs 68% (4.5%), hazard ratio=0.64, 95% CI (0.44, 0.93), P=0.02. In pts without a donor/a sibling successful mobilization of blood stem cells (b-SC) after Co was in HD-Ara-C vs SD-Ara-C arm 53 vs 69%, of failure/postponement 37 vs 24%, and other 9.5 vs 7%. The rate of auto-SCT was similar (65 vs 64%), but harvest of BM cells was more often required in the HD-AraC group (15 vs 4.5%). Pts with an insufficient/delayed b-SC harvest had a longer (P<0.001) platelet recovery (> 50x109/l) after Co than those with a successful harvest: median = 6.7 vs 3.3 wks. Among 393 pts with information on cytogenetics, 14% had good risk, 50% normal, 23% other and 13% poor risk (-5/5q-, -7/7q-, complex). The 2.5-year EFS (no CR, time to relapse or death in CR) rates (SE%) were 68% (7%), 42% (4%), 32% (5%) and 14% (5%), resp. So far: toxicity of HD-Ara-C was acceptable; in those who received HD-AraC in induction platelet recovery after Co was longer and the rate of successful b-SC collection was lower; SCT rates are high and similar in the 2 randomized arms; pts <50 yrs with a donor do have a longer DFS; pts with poor risk cytogenetics continue to have a poor prognosis.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5433-5433
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Jiri Hanousek ◽  
Katerina Machalkova ◽  
...  

Abstract Stem cell mobilization after various induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma Introduction: Rapid development of novel therapies for multiple myeloma has led to a significant improvement in response to the treatment. Stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation is a source of considerable costs of transplant procedure. Whether modern induction regimens affect outcome of stem cell mobilization has not been extensively studied. Aim: The goal of this study was to compare efficacy of stem cell mobilization after different induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma. The primary goal was to compare CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone), CVD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) and regimens in terms of succesful stem cell collection. Methods: All patients with multiple myeloma who have been planned for stem cell collection and were treated with one of the above mentioned regimens were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic data, amount of stem cells collected, number of days needed to reach the target collection were recorded. All patients received high dose cyclophosphamide 2,5 g/m2 prior to stem cell collection and were primed with G-CSF twice daily from day 5. The collection was started at day 10. Collection goal was 8x106/kg CD34+ cells. Results: 15 patients received CTD, 25 patients CVD and 16 patients VTD regimen before stem cell collection. Groups were comparable according to age, gender and myeloma stages. Mean collected cells at the end of collection were 9.2 (SD 2.8) for CTD, 12.3 (SD 5.6) for CVD and 10.1 (SD 2.1) for VTD (p=0.066). Mean daily harvest was 3.4, 8.0 and 7.6 x106/kg respectively (p=0.01). Mean days needed to reach desired harvest were 3, 2.25 and 1.6 days (p=0.001). No collection failure was observed. Conclusion: The best collection results were seen in patients after induction with CVD or VTD regimen. VTD regimen also required the least days for collection and seems to be most beneficial for cost of collection. CTD regimen shows the least efficacy in stem cell collection before autologous transplantation. All patients managed to harvest for at least one stem cell transplant. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib M. Ghaddar ◽  
Sherry Pierce ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Emil J. Freireich ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document