Phase III Randomized Stem Cell Mobilization Trial Comparing Standard Vs Double-Dose G-CSF Vs Standard Doses of G-CSF Plus GM-CSF in Hard to Mobilize Patients Undergoing An Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Author(s):  
Jingyu Xiang ◽  
Min Shi ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Michael P Rettig ◽  
...  

Mobilized peripheral blood has become the primary source of hematopoietic stem cells for both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is currently the standard agent used in the allogeneic setting. Despite the high mobilization efficacy in most donors, G-CSF requires 4-5 days of daily administration, and a small percentage of the donors fail to mobilize an optimal number of stem cells necessary for a safe allogeneic stem cell transplant. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 1361 related allogeneic donors who underwent stem cell mobilization at Washington University. We compared the standard mobilization agent G-CSF with five alternative mobilization regimens, including GM-CSF, G-CSF+GM-CSF, GM-CSF + Plerixafor, Plerixafor and BL-8040. Cytokine-based mobilization strategies (G-CSF or in combination with GM-CSF) induce higher CD34 cell yield after 4-5 consecutive days of treatment, while CXCR4 antagonists (plerixafor and BL-8040) induce significantly less but rapid mobilization on the same day. Next, using a large dataset containing the demographic and baseline laboratory data from G-CSF-mobilized donors, we established machine learning (ML)-based scoring models that can be used to predict patients who may have less than optimal stem cell yields after a single leukapheresis session. To our knowledge, this is the first prediction model at the early donor screening stage, which may help identify allogeneic stem cell donors who may benefit from alternative approaches to enhance stem cell yields thus insuring safe and effective stem cell transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1174-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis F. Porrata ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
...  

Abstract We previously have reported that autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) is a possible prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) for myeloma (MM). Factors affecting A-ALC in MM are unknown. We hypothesize that method of stem cell mobilization, hematopoietic growth factor (HGF) vs. HGF+Cytoxan chemotherapy (C+HGF), directly affects A-ALC collection. 191 consecutive MM patients between 1994 and 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients generally were mobilized with C+HGF prior to 2003. Thereafter, C+HGF was reserved largely for those with ≥4% circulating peripheral blood plasma cells (PC), a negative prognostic indicator. No patients were transplanted in disease relapse or refractory disease. Patients also were matched for age, sex, β2-microglobulin, conventional cytogenetics, LDH, c-reactive protein, number of prior therapies, plasma cell labeling index (PCLI), pre-mobilization ALC, and % bone marrow (BM) PC. The groups HGF (n=80) and C+HGF (n=111) differed with respect to the conditioning regimen (p &lt; 0.0001), and presence of (≥4%) circulating peripheral blood PC (p&lt;0.005). The primary end-point of the study was to assess the correlation between HGF vs C+HGF, and A-ALC. The secondary endpoint was to determine if HGF vs C+HGF affected survival post-ASCT. Patients mobilized with HGF had a higher A-ALC compared to those mobilized with C+HGF [0.764 x 109 lymphocytes/kg (range: 0.146–1.803) vs. 0.212 (range: 0.016–1.26), p&lt;0.0001]. No association was identified between A-ALC and conditioning regimens (p = 0.19) and PC (p = 0.31). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were longer in those mobilized with HGF vs. C+HGF (not reached vs. 48 months, p&lt;0.0150; not reached vs. 21 months, p&lt;0.007, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥50 vs age ≤50 (p&lt;0.05) and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs &lt;0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p&lt;0.0397) were independent predictors of OS. Factors influencing PFS in the multivariate analysis included circulating PC ≥4% vs &lt;4% (p&lt;0.0157), PCLI ≥ 1% vs PCLI ≤ 1% (p&lt;0.0107), and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs &lt;0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p&lt;0.0042). On multivariate analysis, the method of stem cell mobilization and the conditioning regimen did not have a statistically significant effect on either OS or PFS. We hypothesize that the differences in PFS and OS seen between the HGF vs C+HGF mobilization groups are mediated through the A-ALC. These data suggest that mobilization regimens should not only collect CD34+ stem cells, but also be optimized to collect an A-ALC target which may impact on PFS and OS post-ASCT.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516
Author(s):  
Esha Kaul ◽  
Gunjan L Shah ◽  
Chakra P Chaulagain ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Hanna J. Khoury ◽  
Douglas R. Adkins ◽  
...  

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) remains the standard of care, there is considerable interest in incorporating bortezomib into the initial treatment of MM. However, the role of bortezomib in frontline therapy for MM will depend in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. We conducted a pilot study of bortezomib administered pretransplant followed by high-dose melphalan with AHSCT. Two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cell mobilization was initiated by administering filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously on consecutive days until stem cell harvest was completed. Stem cell collection began on day 5 of filgrastim via large volume apheresis (20 L/day) performed daily until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients were subsequently admitted to the hospital for high-dose melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2/day subcutaneously was administered starting day +1 post-transplant and continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. To date, 23 of a planned 40 patients have been enrolled in this study with 19 patients having completed their initial therapy with bortezomib followed by AHSCT. Patient population consists of 16 male and 7 female patients with the median age at diagnosis of 58 years (range 38–68). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (16), IgA (7) with stage II (9) or stage III (14) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 11 patients were treated with VAD (vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) or DVd (Doxil, vincristine and dexamethasone), 5 patients with thalidomide and 5 patients with both. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. All patients successfully achieved the target of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in either one (15/19 patients) or two (4/19 patients) collections with the first apheresis product containing a mean of 5.79 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Analysis of peripheral blood by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant differences in lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment with bortezomib. Following AHSCT, all patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (time to platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 12 days (range 9–30 days). Eleven patients were evaluable for response at 100 days post-transplant. Compared to pre-bortezomib paraprotein levels, 3 patients achieved a CR or near CR, 7 maintained a PR while 1 patient developed PD. We conclude that pretransplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment in patients with MM undergoing AHSCT. Updated results and detailed analysis will be available at the time of presentation.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3321-3321
Author(s):  
Olga Pokrovskaya ◽  
Larisa Mendeleeva ◽  
Irina Kaplanskaya ◽  
Elena Parovichnikova ◽  
Sergei Kulikov ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND. Angiogenesis is a constant hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) progression. It has also been reported that bone marrow angiogenesis is a predictive factor of poor survival in newly diagnosed myeloma. The aim of the current study was to investigate the dynamics of bone marrow (BM) microvessel density (MVD) in patients undergoing high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS. 36 patients with newly diagnosed MM (22 in stage II and 14 in stage III according to Salmon and Durie) were included in the study – 21 male and 15 female, median age – 51 ys (range 31–67). All patients underwent HDT that included 3–4 cycles of induction therapy (VAD), stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2 and G-CSF 5 mcg/kg, EDAP and single or tandem ASCT with melphalan 200 mg/ m2. The BM biopsies for histological and immunohistochemical analysis were performed at the time of diagnosis, after induction, after stem cell mobilization before the 1st ASCT and after the end of therapy (5 times during the treatment). The Control group consisted of normal BM donors (7 male and 3 female, median age 29, (17–59)) who underwent BM biopsy during BM harvesting for alloBMT. Blood vessels were highlighted by immunostaining of endothelial cells with a monoclonal antibody to CD34 (Novocastra Lab Ltd). The MVD was calculated in 10 fields using an 40x objective and 16x ocular lens. RESULTS. At diagnosis in all MM pts, MVD was extremely high compared to normal donors (152±8 vs 74±4). A significant decrease of BM MVD was observed after each phase of therapy: after the induction therapy the MVD was 124±6; before the 1st ASCT – 109±5 and at the end of treatment – 97±3. There was a statistically significant increase of MVD after stem cell mobilization due to G-CSF (143±4). Although there was a marked decrease of BM MVD in MM pts with CR or VGPR, it nevertheless stayed significantly higher compared with control group (p<0,001). The analysis of probability of CR or VGPR duration after ASCT according to MVD at different phases of therapy showed that MVD at diagnosis and before the 1-st ASCT are important prognostic factors. Probability of duration of CR or VGPR was 63% in group with low MVD before the 1st ASCT compared with 15% in group with high MVD (p<0,02). MVD was revealed to be more powerful prognostic factor for progression free survival (PFS) then CR or VGPR achievement. CONCLUSION. BM angiogenesis is increased in patients with MM. BM MVD is decreased during and after treatment however even after the completion of HDT and ASCT, the MVD is higher then in the normal control group. There is a statistically significant increase of MVD after stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. MVD at the time of diagnosis and before the 1-st ASCT are important prognostic factors for overall-survival and PFS after ASCT. MVD before the 1-st ASCT appears to be a more powerful prognostic factor for PFS then remission rate.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3328-3328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Gheorghe Doros ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
Anthony C Shelton ◽  
...  

Abstract Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic and clinical remissions associated with prolonged survival. We have performed 593 transplants from July 1994 to December 2012 in the Amyloidosis Center at Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine. Patients were enrolled in several sequential institutional review board–approved protocols during the 19-year study period. Eligibility criteria for all protocols required biopsy proof of amyloid disease; evidence of a plasma cell dyscrasia and exclusion of other types as appropriate; at least one major affected organ; and adequate measures of cardiac and pulmonary function, and performance status. Functional measures included cardiac ejection fraction 40% or greater, absence of symptomatic pleural effusions, absence of heart failure or arrhythmias resistant to medical management, oxygen saturation of 95% or greater on room air, lung diffusion capacity of 50% or more of predicted, supine systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater, and Southwest Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less unless limited by peripheral neuropathy. Age, renal function, time from diagnosis, prior therapy, and details of the conditioning regimen varied among the trials. Overall, the median age of patients treated with HDM/SCT was 57 years (range, 28-80). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) defined as death occurring within 100 days after SCT occurred in 51 patients, leading to overall TRM of 9% (n=51/593). Additionally, there were 11 deaths during stem cell mobilization and collection phase. No death has occurred since 2005 during stem cell mobilization and collection and TRM has improved to 5% (n=11/235). Total of 324 patients (55%) received full dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 and 269 (45%) received modified dose melphalan at 100-140 mg/m2 per protocol, based upon age and organ function. Hematologic CR, as defined by international consensus criteria, occurred in 40% (n=202/508) of evaluable patients measured at 6-12 months post SCT; by intention-to-treat the CR rate was 34%. Hematologic CR occurred in 44% (n=129/291) patients who received 200 mg/m2 of HDM compared to 34% (n=73/217) patients who received 100-140 mg/m2 of HDM (chi square p=0.015). Hematologic relapse occurred in 40 patients (20%) with CR at a median of 3.9 years (range, 1.6-12.4). The median overall survival (OS) is 6.7 years with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The median OS has not been reached for patients achieving a hematologic CR but exceeds 12.4 years, compared to 5.9 years for those not achieving CR (log-rank p<0.001). The median OS for patients following hematologic relapse is 3.5 years. Twenty-five % of patients are alive, up to 19 years after undergoing HDM/SCT. These data highlight the remarkable long-term survival results that can be obtained in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with HDM/SCT. While survival is strongly dependent upon achieving a hematologic CR, the survival of patients who do not achieve a CR and of those who relapse after CR also is notable, suggesting a benefit of treatment. Strategies to improve risk-stratification of patients and reduce TRM, as well as using sequential or combination therapies to increase the CR rate, will likely improve outcomes in the future for patients who just a few years ago were considered to have a rapidly fatal diagnosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5433-5433
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Jiri Hanousek ◽  
Katerina Machalkova ◽  
...  

Abstract Stem cell mobilization after various induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma Introduction: Rapid development of novel therapies for multiple myeloma has led to a significant improvement in response to the treatment. Stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation is a source of considerable costs of transplant procedure. Whether modern induction regimens affect outcome of stem cell mobilization has not been extensively studied. Aim: The goal of this study was to compare efficacy of stem cell mobilization after different induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma. The primary goal was to compare CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone), CVD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) and regimens in terms of succesful stem cell collection. Methods: All patients with multiple myeloma who have been planned for stem cell collection and were treated with one of the above mentioned regimens were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic data, amount of stem cells collected, number of days needed to reach the target collection were recorded. All patients received high dose cyclophosphamide 2,5 g/m2 prior to stem cell collection and were primed with G-CSF twice daily from day 5. The collection was started at day 10. Collection goal was 8x106/kg CD34+ cells. Results: 15 patients received CTD, 25 patients CVD and 16 patients VTD regimen before stem cell collection. Groups were comparable according to age, gender and myeloma stages. Mean collected cells at the end of collection were 9.2 (SD 2.8) for CTD, 12.3 (SD 5.6) for CVD and 10.1 (SD 2.1) for VTD (p=0.066). Mean daily harvest was 3.4, 8.0 and 7.6 x106/kg respectively (p=0.01). Mean days needed to reach desired harvest were 3, 2.25 and 1.6 days (p=0.001). No collection failure was observed. Conclusion: The best collection results were seen in patients after induction with CVD or VTD regimen. VTD regimen also required the least days for collection and seems to be most beneficial for cost of collection. CTD regimen shows the least efficacy in stem cell collection before autologous transplantation. All patients managed to harvest for at least one stem cell transplant. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3288-3288
Author(s):  
Adriana I. Colovai ◽  
Joseph Schwartz ◽  
Ronit Slotky ◽  
Zhouru Liu ◽  
Jianshe Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract Various regimens used for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization have been optimized to mobilize a maximum number of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) into the peripheral blood. However, the effects of mobilization regimens on other bone marrow derived cell populations have not been carefully examined. Since T cells from HSC grafts play an important role in anti-tumor responses, we studied T cell function in 11 adult patients with hematological malignancies undergoing mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Mobilization regimens consisted of G-CSF alone (3 patients) or in combination with: GM-CSF (1 patient), chemotherapy (2), GM-CSF and chemotherapy (3), or AMD3100 (2). T cell function was determined using ImmuKnow (Cylex) assay, an FDA approved test, which measures immune cell function in whole blood by quantifying the amount of ATP released by PHA-stimulated CD4+ T helper (Th) cells. Prior to mobilization treatment, average Th reactivity was 242±128 ng ATP/ml (normal range: 200–525 ng ATP/ml). With mobilization, Th reactivity increased gradually in all patients, reaching peak reactivity values (>525 ng ATP/ml) on day 4–6 of treatment. Efficient stem cell mobilization (≥10 CD34+ cells/ul of blood) was accomplished in 8 out of 11 patients. These 8 patients exhibited an average Th peak reactivity level of 701±126 ng ATP/ml. Stem cell mobilization failed in the remaining 3 patients (<10 CD34+ cells/ul). Two of these patients had received AMD3100 (a CXCR4 inhibitor) and G-CSF, and showed unusually high ATP levels (>1000 ng/ml). Chi-Square analysis indicated that there was an inverse correlation between CD34 stem cell counts and peak ATP levels (p=0.01). However, there was no direct relationship between the number of CD3+ or CD3+CD4+ T cells and Th reactivity. Immunophenotypic studies performed in 4 patients with CD34 counts ≥10 cells/ul and 2 patients with CD34 counts <10 cells/ul indicated that the agents used for stem cell mobilization triggered the expansion of CD4+CD25+ T cell population. However, the vast majority of these T cells did not co-express FoxP3, the characteristic marker of regulatory T cells, consistent with the enhanced T cell reactivity detected in these patients. It, therefore, results that mobilization agents have a “priming” effect on CD4+ T helper cells, inducing their robust activation. This effect may lead to improved anti-tumor surveillance and might contribute to the higher rate of complete remission and overall survival observed in patients with hematological malignancies, who have received autologous SCT in addition to chemotherapy. Thus, monitoring of T cell reactivity by Immuknow assay might help tailor therapy to maximize the patient’s potential to mount an immune response against the tumor and, at the same time, obtain efficient stem cell mobilization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19000-e19000
Author(s):  
Klodiana Neme ◽  
David Henkin ◽  
Nancy Mikulandric ◽  
Meredith Grycki ◽  
Angela Michael ◽  
...  

e19000 Background: Studies have reported that use of filgrastim (G) or any biosimilar result in similar stem cell yield during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, but little is known on the effect of these biosimilars on length of hospitalization for the transplant procedure, engraftment, and long term survival of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Beginning January 2017, the Henry Ford Cancer Institute (HFCI) began utilizing tbo-filgrastim (TBO) and filgrastim-sndz (SNDZ) as part of mobilization. This study was conducted to evaluate transplant specific outcomes in HSCT patients comparing biosimilar and reference filgrastim products. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at HFCI who received G-CSF based mobilization for HSCT between 1/2017 and 11/2018. Patient-, mobilization- and transplant specific variables were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 113 patients underwent stem cell mobilization followed by collection and autologous HSCT. Of the 73 patients analyzed, 62% had a diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma (MM), 22% had Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Approximately 45% of patients received TBO, 44% received G and remainder received SNDZ. The percentage of patients who proceeded to HSCT was 86%. There was no difference in adequate CD34+ yield among the three G-CSF products (P = 0.074). There was no difference in mobilization associated complications including bone pain and thrombocytopenia. Plerixafor use was similar among the groups (P = 0.55). Actual CD34+ (P = 0.31) and the number of apheresis sessions required to collect an adequate CD34+ yield (P = 0.30) were not different among the groups. No significant differences were noted in time to neutrophil (P = 0.96) or platelet engraftment (P = 0.91) and hospital length of stay (P = 0.78). We found similar rates of infection, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis among the three groups. Relapse rates were also similar among the groups. Conclusions: In our institution transplant related outcomes were similar among patients who received TBO, SNDZ, and G as part of their pre-transplant mobilization protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document