Exercising professional judgment in such areas as counseling drug product selection raises new liability issues for pharmacists

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Lynn ◽  
Robert E. Kamm
1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
G J Vuturo ◽  
J P Krischer ◽  
W C McCormick

1973 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 444-450
Author(s):  
George Kennedy Cawthorne ◽  
Fred M. Eckel

One hundred fifty-six U.S. drug companies were surveyed to determine whether or not they would supply bioavailability data on 147 drugs marketed as 1894 drug products. The submitted data were analyzed for completeness, validity and potential usefulness to the pharmacist in making drug product selection decisions. Ninety (57.7 percent) companies responded to the survey. Thirty-eight (24.4 percent) sent data of which that from 29 (18.6 percent) was judged acceptable for use in drug product selection. Acceptable data were submitted on 59 drugs. Data on 46 drugs were considered blood-level bioavailability data while the data on 13 drugs were considered clinical bioavailability data. The results, though relatively limited in number of drugs, represented drugs in a number of different pharmacologic classes, so were judged to be of relatively wide applicability.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
David L. Rosen

This article provides pharmacists and other health professionals with a practical guide to using FDA's Orange Book, the authoritative source for FDA approved products and their respective therapeutic equivalence ratings. Copyright © 1995 by W.B. Saunders Company


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Carrier

One of the most pressing issues in antitrust law involves “product hopping.” A brand-name pharmaceutical company switches from one version of a drug (say, capsule) to another (say, tablet). The concern with this conduct is that some of these switches offer only a trivial medical benefit but significantly impair generic competition.The antitrust analysis of product hopping is nuanced. In the U.S., it implicates the intersection of antitrust law, patent law, the Hatch-Waxman Act, and state drug product selection laws. In fact, the behavior is even more complex because it involves uniquely complicated markets characterized by buyers (insurance companies, patients) who are different from the decision-makers (physicians).This article introduces the relevant U.S. laws and regulatory frameworks before exploring the five litigated cases.


1974 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 931-931
Author(s):  
William A. Zellmer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document