458 Poster Adjuvant radiotherapy and concomitant raltitrexed in radically resected stage II–III rectal cancer. A phase I–II prospective study

2002 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S149
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy L. Fitzgerald ◽  
Emmanuel Zervos ◽  
Jan H. Wong

High-level evidence supports adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. We examined the influence of sociodemographic factors on patterns of adjuvant radiotherapy for resected Stage II/III rectal cancer.Methods. Patients undergoing surgical resection for stage II/III rectal cancer were identified in SEER registry.Results. A total of 21,683 patients were identified. Majority of patients were male (58.8%), white (83%), and with stage III (54.9%) and received radiotherapy (66%). On univariate analysis, male gender, stage III, younger age, year of diagnosis, and higher socioeconomic status (SES) were associated with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered in 84.4% of patients<50; however, only 32.8% of those are>80 years. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant increase in the use of radiotherapy in younger patients who are<50 (OR, 10.3), with stage III (OR, 1.21), males (OR, 1.18), and with higher SES.Conclusions. There is a failure to conform to standard adjuvant radiotherapy in one-third of patients, and this is associated with older age, stage II, area-level of socioeconomic deprivation, and female sex.


Author(s):  
A.T. Berman ◽  
S. Singhal ◽  
J.C. Kucharczuk ◽  
J.D. Cooper ◽  
J.R. Friedberg ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Fujita ◽  
Seiichiro Yamamoto ◽  
Takayuki Akasu ◽  
Yoshihiro Moriya

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Ja Park ◽  
Hee Cheol Kim ◽  
Chang Sik Yu ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Se Jin Jang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3542-3542
Author(s):  
Catherine Delbaldo ◽  
Marc Ychou ◽  
Ayman Zawadi ◽  
Jean-Yves Douillard ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
...  

3542 Background: The goal of the study was to test whether adding Irinotecan to a 5-FU/LV adjuvant regimen improves disease free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in optimally resected stages II-III rectal cancers. Primary end-point was DFS. Methods: Six hundred patients were planned to be randomized between 5-FU/LV (control arm) or 5-FU/LV + irinotecan (experimental arm). As only 357 patients had been included from 03/1999 to 12/2005 (178 in control and 179 in experimental arm), the IDMC recommended to close accrual. The trial was stratified by control arm: Mayo-Clinic regimen (A: LV 20 mg/m², 5-FU 425 mg/m² bolus days (d) 1- 5 reapeted at d29,57,92,127 and 162) or LV5-FU2 regimen (A’: LV 200 mg/m², 5-FU 400 mg/m² bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m² 22-hours infusion d1-2, q 2 w for 12 cycles). The experimental arm (B) was LV5-FU2 + irinotecan 180 mg/m² d1. Results: All 357 randomized patients were evaluable for efficacy. Patient characteristics were well balanced (median age 62 years, stage II 31 %, stage III 69 %, N0 31 %, 68 % received preoperative radiotherapy, and 80 % had sphincter conservation). With follow-up of 156 months, DFS and OS are not statistically increase (81vs 92 events for DFS in experimental and control arm, hazard ratio (HR)=0.805, p=0.154;63 vs 72 events for OS, HR=0.874, p=0.433). Patients allocated to the experimental arm had more grade 3-4 neutropenia when compared with the LV5FU2 control (33 % vs 16 %, p=0.03), but not when compared with the Mayo Clinic arm (32% vs 36%, p=0.84). Grade 3-4 diarrhea tend to be higher in the experimental arm, but analyses stratified by control arm or by radiotherapy failed to show significant differences across strata (test for interaction p=0.44). Conclusions: In patients with resected stage II-III rectal cancer, adding irinotecan to 5FU/LV led to a non significant increase of DFS and OS. The analysis was planned to have a 60 % power to detect a significant difference with 220 events. With a long term follow up of 8 years only 173 events were observed in our trial. Lack of power and good patient prognosis (thirty one percent of node negative patients) may have impacted the results.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (17) ◽  
pp. 3712-3718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
Sarah E. Gelfand ◽  
Peter B. Bach ◽  
Jose Guillem ◽  
Bruce D. Minsky ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between patient characteristics and the use of adjuvant pelvic radiation with and without chemotherapy among patients aged 65 years and older with stage II and III rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked database identified 1,411 patients aged 65 and older with resected stage II and III rectal cancers diagnosed between 1992 and 1996. From claims submitted to Medicare, we measured the use of pelvic radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy and pre- or postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of patients received radiation, 42% received chemotherapy and radiation, and 7% had treatment delivered preoperatively. Age was the strongest determinant of treatment: 73% of patients aged 65 to 69, 66% aged 70 to 75, 52% aged 75 to 79, 39% aged 80 to 84, and 21% aged 85 to 89 received radiation. The age trend remained strong after adjusting for other factors that predict receipt of treatment and after exclusion of patients with any evident comorbidity (P < .001). Patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment if they had an abdominal perineal resection, stage III disease, or a T4 tumor. CONCLUSION: Because pelvic recurrences are a substantial cause of morbidity, further efforts are needed to ensure that elderly patients have the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding adjuvant treatment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S93
Author(s):  
Chang Geol Lee ◽  
Choong Bae Kim ◽  
Kyung Young Chung ◽  
Doo Yun Lee ◽  
Chang Ok Suh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. Reddy ◽  
N. Merchant ◽  
J. Berlin ◽  
J. Morrow ◽  
A. Herline ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document