scholarly journals OC-0183: Independent validation of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy source localisation using an EPID

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S71-S72
Author(s):  
R.D. Franich ◽  
R.L. Smith ◽  
M.L. Taylor ◽  
A. Haworth ◽  
L.N. McDermott ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tania Afroz ◽  
Pretam K. Das ◽  
S. I. Chawdhury ◽  
Shudeb K. Roy

Aim of this work is to calibrate the high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy source 60Co. The radioactive source calibration is a very important part of the quality assurance program for dosimetry of brachytherapy source. The goal of this project is the calibration of HDR Brachytherapy source in radiation therapy is the measurement of the air kerma rate which required actual dose to deliver. The source calibration is an essential part of the quality assurance program for dosimetry of brachytherapy source. This research will help the patient who is involving brachytherapy treatment. HDR brachytherapy source 60Co is inserted directly or in close to the tumor. Most commonly using method for calibration of HDR brachytherapy source 60CO is well type ionization chamber. Calibration of the radioactive source 60Co brachytherapy source is very important for the treatment of cancer patient. We have got the variation between RAKR from TPS and measured Air Kerma Rate of 60Co brachytherapy source are 3.2% and 3.04% and which give very good agreement with the Air Kerma Rate (RAKR) is 5% (from BEBIG protocol, Germany). So, our results were satisfied for brachytherapy treatment. From these results, it must be concluded that, 60Co brachytherapy source is suitable for brachytherapy cancer treatment. It is very difficult to calculate treatment deliver dose without calibrating AKR of HDR brachytherapy source. It is very important to verify the calculated Air Kerma Rate by TPS Air Kerma Rate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akbar Sarabiasl ◽  
Navid Ayoobian ◽  
Hossein Poorbaygi ◽  
Iraj Jabbari ◽  
Mohammad Reza Javanshir

Brachytherapy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Michel I. Ghilezan ◽  
J. Vito Antonucci ◽  
Gary S. Gustafson ◽  
Peter Chen ◽  
Michelle Wallace ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
P.J. Anderson ◽  
R.J. Mark ◽  
R.S. Akins ◽  
T.R. Neumann ◽  
S. Gurley ◽  
...  

Brachytherapy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Matthew Biagioli ◽  
B-Chen Wen ◽  
Brandon Patton ◽  
Caroline Hoffman ◽  
Mark Harvey

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-106
Author(s):  
Amir Shahabaz ◽  
Muhammad Afzal

A technique of radiation therapy delivery in which the radioactive sources are placed very close or even inside the target volume is called Brachytherapy (BT). Brachytherapy is a type of radiation therapy. It destroys cancer cells by making it hard for them to multiply. In this technique, a radiation source is placed directly into or near a tumour. High dose-rate brachytherapy is also known as HDR brachytherapy, or temporary brachytherapy. It is a type of internal radiotherapy. HDR was developed to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence while shortening the amount of time it takes to get radiation treatment. HDR also limits the dose of radiation (associated side effects) to surrounding normal tissue. The important benefits of HDR brachytherapy include extremely precise radiation therapy delivered internally, used alone or after surgery to help prevent cancer recurrence, convenient treatments that are usually pain-free, and a reduction in the risk of common short- and long-term side effects. Currently, tumour dose, as well as doses of the surrounding normal structures, can be evaluated accurately, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy enables three-dimensional image guidance. The biological disadvantages of high-dose-rate were overcome by fractional irradiation. In the definitive radiation therapy of cervical cancer, high-dose-rate brachytherapy is most necessary. Most patients feel little discomfort during brachytherapy. There is no residual radioactivity when the treatment is completed. A patient may be able to go home shortly after the procedure, resuming his normal activities with few restrictions. An advantage of brachytherapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumour during treatment and save the surrounding normal tissues. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has great promise with respect to proper case selection and delivery technique because it eliminates radiation exposure, can be performed on an outpatient basis and allows short treatment times. Additionally, by varying the dwell time at each dwell position, the use of a single-stepping source allows optimization of dose distribution. As the short treatment times do not allow any time for correction of errors, and mistakes can result in harm to patients, so the treatments must be executed carefully by using HDR brachytherapy. Refinements will occur primarily in the integration of imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative ultrasonography) and optimization of dose distribution and it is expected that the use of HDR brachytherapy will greatly expand over the next decade. Various factors in the development of well-controlled randomized trials addressing issues of efficacy, quality of life, toxicity and costs-versus-benefits will ultimately define the role of HDR brachytherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium. Surrounding healthy tissues are not affected by the radiation due to the ability to target radiation therapy at high dose rates directly to the tumour. Treatment to be delivered as an outpatient in as few as one to five sessions is also allowed by this targeted high dose approach. HDR brachytherapy is the most precision radiation therapy, even better than carbon ion therapy. At the time of invasive placement of the radiation source into the tumour area, brachytherapy requires the skills and techniques of radiation oncologists.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish K. Goyal ◽  
T. S. Kehwar ◽  
Jayanand Manjhi ◽  
Jerry L. Barker ◽  
Bret H. Heintz ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeThis study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods.MethodsThis study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis).ResultsMean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519.ConclusionFor cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document