Variation of nuclear DNA content during somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Coffea arabica L. using cytophotometry

Plant Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana E Zoriniants ◽  
Alexander V Nosov ◽  
Miriam Monforte-Gonzalez ◽  
Marcela Mendes-Zeel ◽  
Victor M Loyola-Vargas
Genome ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1053-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C Herrera ◽  
Marie C Combes ◽  
Hernando Cortina ◽  
Philippe Lashermes

Factors controlling gene introgression into cultivated arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) were investigated. Interspecific triploid hybrid plants between the tetraploid species C. arabica (2n = 44) and a diploid species (2n = 22), either Coffea canephora or Coffea eugenioides, were backcrossed to C. arabica (male parent). Flow cytometric analysis of the nuclear DNA content revealed that most of the BC1 individuals derived from triploid hybrids involving C. eugenioides were tetraploid or nearly tetraploid. Among the gametes produced by the interspecific triploid hybrids, those possessing approximately 22 chromosomes appeared strongly favored. The amount of introgression in BC1 individuals (21 and 43 for the BC1 progenies involving C. canephora and C. eugenioides, respectively) was estimated using species-specific microsatellite markers. A large number of introgressed markers was observed in all BC1 individuals. Nevertheless, while the frequency of introgressed markers seemed as expected, assuming random chromosome segregation and diploid gamete formation, in the BC1 derived from triploid hybrids involving C. canephora, this frequency appeared significantly lower in the BC1 derived from triploid hybrids involving C. eugenioides. Furthermore, the comparison of reciprocal progenies between C. arabica and triploid interspecific hybrids (C. arabica × C. canephora) used as male or female parent revealed a very strong effect of the backcross direction.Key words: irregular meiosis, coffee, reciprocal crosses, molecular marker, triploid hybrids.


HortScience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1004
Author(s):  
Josue Ortega-Ortega ◽  
Francisco Arturo Ramírez-Ortega ◽  
Roberto Ruiz-Medrano ◽  
Beatriz Xoconostle-Cázares

Coffee is an important crop worldwide, grown on about 10 million hectares in tropical regions including Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The genus Coffea includes more than 100 species; most are diploid, except for C. arabica, which is allotetraploid and autogamous. The genetic diversity of commercial coffee is low, likely due to it being self-pollinating, in addition, the widespread propagation of few selected cultivars, such as Caturra, Bourbon, and Typica. One approach is the analysis of genome size in these cultivars as a proxy to study its genetic variability. In the present work, genome size of 16 cultivars was assessed through high-resolution flow cytometry (FCM). Nuclear DNA was analyzed using a modified procedure that uses propidium iodide (PI) and 4′,6′-diamino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride hydrate (DAPI) staining. The C. arabica cultivars investigated possessed a nuclear DNA content ranging from 2.56 ± 0.016 pg for Typica, to 3.16 ± 0.033 pg for ICATU, which had the largest genome size. All cultivars measured using both fluorochromes had greater estimates with DAPI than PI. The proportion of the genome composed of guanosine and cytosine (GC%) among the cultivars evaluated in this study ranged from 37.03% to 39.22%. There are few studies of genome size by FCM of distinct important C. arabica cultivars, e.g., hybrids and artificial crosses. Thus, this work could be valuable for coffee breeding programs. The data presented here are intended to expand the genomic understanding of C. arabica and could link nuclear DNA content with evolutionary relationships such as diversification, hybridization and polyploidy.


1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap F. Hamming ◽  
Lodewijk J. D. M. Schelfhout ◽  
Cees J. Cornelisse ◽  
Cornelis J. H. van de Velde ◽  
Bernard M. Goslings ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Terrence R. Tiersch ◽  
Robert W. Chandler ◽  
Klaus D. Kallman ◽  
Stephen S. Wachtel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document