scholarly journals 124: Electronic cigarette use and risk perception in a Stop Smoking Service in England

Lung Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
F. Sherratt ◽  
M. Marcus ◽  
J. Robinson ◽  
L. Newson ◽  
J. Field
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances C. Sherratt ◽  
Michael W. Marcus ◽  
Jude Robinson ◽  
Lisa Newson ◽  
John K. Field

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Hiscock ◽  
Deborah Arnott ◽  
Martin Dockrell ◽  
Louise Ross ◽  
Andy McEwen

Introduction: We have undertaken four online surveys of Stop Smoking Service (SSS) practitioners in England, between 2011 and 2016, in order to enhance our understanding of e-cigarettes: a fast moving new phenomenon. It is important to understand whether e-cigarettes can ameliorate or exacerbate health inequalities given that smoking is one of the most serious causes of excessive mortality and morbidity among disadvantaged groups globally.Aims: To update findings of previous surveys and examine socioeconomic status differences in e-cigarette use and efficacy.Methods: Analysis was undertaken of electronic surveys, particularly, the most recent 2016 survey (n = 514) and 2015/16 SSS client routine monitoring data.Results: SSS practitioners were becoming more positive about e-cigarettes: 42% agreed that e-cigarettes were a good thing compared with 15% in 2011. Reported use of e-cigarettes among SSS clients was low (about 3%) despite higher quit rates (63% of clients reported being quit at four week follow-up, compared with 51% overall). Where socioeconomic differences in e-cigarettes’ efficacy for quitting were identified, affluent and working smokers were advantaged.Conclusions: Low use of e-cigarettes by clients and practitioner opinions suggest that further education of SSS staff is needed if they are to adopt the current service recommendations about e-cigarettes.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Pulvers ◽  
R.B. Hayes ◽  
T.S. Scheuermann ◽  
D.R. Romero ◽  
A.S. Emami ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison N. Baker ◽  
Stephen J. Wilson ◽  
John E. Hayes

AbstractElectronic cigarette use—vaping—is increasingly popular. Various product factors may influence an individual’s choice of e-cigarette. To provide an evidence base for e-cigarette regulation, a better understanding of the role different product attributes play in product preferences is needed. Here, we used conjoint analysis to quantify different factors that influence e-cigarettes choices, including flavors, nicotine level, customizability, or use of e-cigarettes to manage appetite/food craving. Young adults completed a set of choice-based conjoint tasks online. Choice Based Conjoint analysis (CBC) was used to determine utility scores for each attribute. Young adults (n = 587) who vaped at least once per week were included in analyses; gender differences were explored. Flavor was the most important attribute (48.1%), followed by product messaging (21.0%) and nicotine level (15.3%). Within flavor, confectionery and fruit flavors had the highest utility scores, while classic menthol and tobacco flavors had the lowest. Men and women differed in flavors, nicotine levels, and product messaging that appealed most. Among young adults who vape weekly, flavor is the most important factor in e-cigarette preferences. Gender also factors into e-cigarette preferences, especially for preferred nicotine level. Understanding why individuals choose particular e-cigarette products will help inform public health efforts and policy making.


Midwifery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 102917
Author(s):  
Suzanne Froggatt ◽  
Nadja Reissland ◽  
Judith Covey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document