Trigger Finger in a Child as a Complication of Interphalangeal Dislocation

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. CASE ◽  
I. J. LESLIE
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
A2 Pulley

We describe stenosis of the A2 pulley in a 13-month-old infant following a dislocation of a proximal interphalangeal joint, resulting in triggering of the finger.

A proximal interphalangeal joint custom-made orthosis in trigger finger: Functional outcome

Hand Therapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 175899832110187
Author(s):  
Kawee Pataradool ◽  
Chayanin Lertmahandpueti
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Quick Dash

Introduction Trigger finger is a common and functionally limiting disorder. Finger immobilization using an orthotic device is one of the conservative treatment options for treating this condition. The most common orthosis previously described for trigger finger is metacarpophalangeal joint immobilization. There are limited studies describing the effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint orthosis for treatment of trigger finger. Methods This study was a single group pretest-posttest design. Adult patients with single digit idiopathic trigger finger were recruited and asked to wear a full-time orthoses for 6 weeks. The pre- and post-outcome measures included Quick-DASH score, the Stages of Stenosing Tenosynovitis (SST), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the number of triggering events in ten active fists, and participant satisfaction with symptom improvement. Orthotic devices were made with thermoplastic material fabricated with adjustable Velcro tape at dorsal side. All participants were given written handouts on this disease, orthotic care and gliding exercises. Paired t-tests were used to determine changes in outcome measures before and after wearing the orthosis. Results There were 30 participants included in this study. Evaluation after the use of PIP joint orthosis at 6 weeks revealed that there were statistically significant improvements in Quick-DASH score from enrolment (mean difference −29.0 (95%CI −34.5 to −23.4); p < 0.001), SST (mean difference −1.4 (95%CI −1.8 to −1.0); p < 0.001) and VAS (mean difference −3.4 (95%CI −4.3 to −2.5); p < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events and patient satisfaction with the treatment was high. Conclusions Despite our small study size, the use of proximal interphalangeal joint orthosis for 6 weeks resulted in statistically significant improvements in function, pain and triggering, and also high rates of acceptance in patients with isolated idiopathic trigger finger.

scholarly journals Comparative study of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release versus blinded percutaneous A1 pulley release

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901877236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Lee ◽  
Young Chae Choi ◽  
Hong Je Kang
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
A1 Pulley

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of blind versus ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release for treatment of trigger finger. Methods: This prospective study included 21 patients (25 fingers) who underwent blind release and 20 patients (23 fingers) who underwent ultrasonography-guided release. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, proximal interphalangeal joint contracture, complications, and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. Results: At the final follow-up, triggering had disappeared in all patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided release, whereas three patients who underwent blind release required revision surgery for postoperative triggering. No complications were observed. VAS score was significantly different between groups at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. All patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided release were satisfied, whereas three patients who underwent blind release were not satisfied. Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release for treatment of trigger finger reduces postoperative pain and complications, such as incomplete release, compared with a blind procedure.

Clinical significance of proximal interphalangeal joint pain in patients with trigger fingers

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-384
Author(s):  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Gook Jin Choi ◽  
Dong Mo Kang
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Pain Group ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Comparison Of The Results ◽  
A1 Pulley

We investigated incidence, clinical features and surgical outcomes of trigger finger accompanied by proximal interphalangeal joint pain. One-hundred and seventy-nine consecutive patients with trigger finger who had A1 pulley release were recruited. Forty-two patients (24%) complained of proximal interphalangeal joint pain at the time of surgery. Symptom duration was investigated, and tenderness at the proximal interphalangeal joint was palpated. Range of motion and pain score of the affected finger were measured pre- and post-operatively. Bone scan was performed to identify joint lesions. A comparison of the results between the proximal interphalangeal joint pain group and the non-proximal interphalangeal joint pain group shows that the proximal interphalangeal joint pain seemed to result from long symptom duration and consequent joint pathology. The proximal interphalangeal joint pain was incompletely resolved after A1 pulley release. Thus, the surgical outcomes might be worse than expected in spite of resolution of painful clicking, especially when there was additional joint tenderness on palpation. Level of evidence: IV

Congenital Triggering of The Index Finger at The A2 Pulley

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. HIRATA ◽  
K. FUJISAWA ◽  
H. SASAKI ◽  
A. MORITA ◽  
M. MATSUMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
A2 Pulley ◽  
Made In

A case of trigger index finger is reported. The diagnosis was made in the neonatal intensive care unit. The proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) was locked in a flexed position. A nodular thickening of the flexor tendon was felt at the A2 pulley level. Surgery revealed thickening of both the A2 pulley and the radial slip of the flexor superficialis tendon. Division of the A2 pulley released the PIP joint locking.

REPORT OF AN UNUSUAL CASE OF TRIGGER FINGER SECONDARY TO PHALANGEAL EXOSTOSIS

Hand Surgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 135-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Lee ◽  
R. W. H. Pho
Keyword(s):  
Physical Examination ◽  
Unusual Case ◽  
Middle Finger ◽  
Tendon Sheath ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Anomalous Muscle ◽  
Stenosing Tenosynovitis ◽  
Left Middle

Trigger finger is commonly secondary to stenosing tenosynovitis. Space occupying lesions in the tendon bed, although uncommon, may prevent smooth tendon gliding. These include lipoma, anomalous muscle insertions, tumours of the tendon sheath and haemangiomas. We describe a patient who had triggering of the left middle finger at the proximal interphalangeal joint due to an exostosis blocking the flexor tendons gliding. Removal of the exostosis relieved the problem. The clinician must be aware that there are other causes for triggering. These may be identified with pertinent findings in the history and physical examination.

Trigger Finger Treatment by Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection (U.S.S.R.)

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. LE VIET ◽  
I. TSIONOS ◽  
M. BOULOUEDNINE ◽  
D. HANNOUCHE
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Flexion Deformity ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
History Of ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Fixed Flexion Deformity ◽  
A1 Pulley

Surgical release of the A1 pulley for treatment of trigger finger normally produces excellent results. However, in patients with long-standing disease, there may be a persistent fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint. This is sometimes due to a degenerative thickening of the flexor tendons and may be treated by resection of the ulnar slip of flexor digitorum superficialis tendon. One hundred seventy-two patients (228 fingers) who had undergone this procedure were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 66 months. Mean pre-operative fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 33°. All but eight fingers were improved by surgery and there was an average gain of 26° in passive extension (7° residual fixed flexion deformity) of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Full extension was attained in 141 of the 228 fingers, and in all 101 fingers with a pre-operative loss of passive extension of 30° or less. This technique is indicated for patients with loss of passive extension in the proximal interphalangeal joint and a long history of triggering.

Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release Combined with Finger Splint for Trigger Finger with Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 270-275
Author(s):  
Tzu-Cheng Yang ◽  
Duretti Fufa ◽  
Hui-Kuang Huang ◽  
Yi-Chao Huang ◽  
Ming-Chau Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Group I ◽  
Percutaneous Release ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
A1 Pulley

Background: Long-standing trigger finger can lead to proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion contracture. In the present study, we present the clinical outcome of percutaneous release with finger splinting for trigger finger with PIP joint flexion contracture prospectively. Methods: We compared outcomes in patients with trigger fingers combined with proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture treated by percutaneous release therapy regimen alone (group I) or percutaneous trigger finger release combined with finger splint (group II) during January 2011 and May 2016 with 6 months follow up. Results: Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to group I (35 patients) or group II (30 patients). Symptoms of locking sensation and pain over the A1 pulley were improved in all patients. The patients in group II showed significantly greater improvements in the flexion contracture angles of proximal interphalangeal joint at post-operative 3 months later (group I, 9.4° ± 4.1°; group II, 27.8° ± 4.6°) and at 6 months later (group I, 15.1° ± 5.2°; group II, 35.7° ± 5.3°) relative to group I. In group II, 25 fingers achieved near full extension (< 10° contracture) after 6 months. Conclusions: Percutaneous release combined with finger splint is regarded as a useful therapy to speed recovery of trigger finger with proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture.

Arthroplasty in the hand: what works and what doesn’t?

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110177
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Herren ◽  
Hajime Ishikawa ◽  
Marco Rizzo ◽  
Mark Ross ◽  
Michael Solomons
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Distal Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Radioulnar Joint ◽  
What Works ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal

This review describes the different possibilities for arthroplasties at the proximal interphalangeal joint, thumb carpometacarpal joint, distal radioulnar joint, metacarpophalangeal joint and the wrist. For each joint, the indication for arthroplasty is explained, the surgical technique with the suitable implant is described and a brief summary of the outcomes reported in the literature is given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document