Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigations

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (9-12) ◽  
pp. 931-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A Hunter ◽  
B Benjumea ◽  
J.B Harris ◽  
R.D Miller ◽  
S.E Pullan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-71
Author(s):  
Yayat Kusumahadi ◽  
Suttisak Soralump ◽  
Montri Jinagoolwipat

Soil site investigations such as boring logs, basic soil properties, spectral analysis of surface wave, and the examinations of geologic and geomorphologic were performed in Mae Lao area to investigate the susceptibility of liquefaction after the 6.2 Mw Chiang Rai Earthquake 2014. The study area was found to lay on a complex geological formation and geotechnical behavior with a condition of the high groundwater table. Being located on a high seismicity area (intensity V-VII Mercalli) governs the study area as a concern for high liquefaction hazards. Liquefaction susceptibility-based compositional criteria, soil resistance, and geologic criteria have been established, and consequently, the character of liquefaction potential is defined.


2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 18-21
Author(s):  
Zhuo Shi Chen ◽  
Xiao Ming Yuan ◽  
Shang Jiu Meng

The main causes of the ground motion blind prediction bias are the variability of the adopted program, the shear-wave velocity of the site, and the soil nonlinear dynamic parameters. By considering the variability of shear-wave velocity and the dynamic parameters, this essay used LSSRLI-1 Codes and Mw6.0 seismic record of Parkfield earthquake to calculate ground responses of 9 different conditions at Turkey Flat site. The authors believe that the variability of shear-wave velocity caused the dominant impact to the blind prediction of this shallow stiff-soil site. That impact is much greater than that of the dynamic parameters. LSSRLI-1 program may either underestimate the ground response of the shallow stiff-soil site or may overestimate it, so we should combine the specific site conditions and a large amounts of data to do the further analysis.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ismail ◽  
Andrew Stumpf ◽  
Neil Anderson ◽  
William Dey

Geophysics ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. McGuinness ◽  
Walter C. Beckmann ◽  
Charles B. Officer

Sonic and seismic methods applied to marine and land civil engineering projects and several unique techniques applied to specialized problems encountered in engineering are described. The geophysical techniques discussed include Sparker and Gas Exploder surveys for marine site investigations, measurements of ground motion for quiet instrument facilities, undersea cable environmental studies, and in situ determination of pile lengths.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Motazedian ◽  
J. A. Hunter ◽  
A. Pugin ◽  
H. Crow

Four different seismic methods were used extensively to evaluate the shear wave velocity of soils and rock in the city of Ottawa, Canada, from which the travel-time weighted average shear wave velocity (Vs) from surface to 30 m in depth (Vs30) and the fundamental frequency (F0) were computed. Three main geological or geotechnical units were identified with distinct shear wave velocities: these consist of very loose thick post-glacial fine-grained sands, silts, and clays (Vs <150 m/s, thickness up to 110 m), firm glacial sediments (Vs ∼580 m/s, thickness ∼3 m), and very firm bedrock (Vs ∼1750–3550 m/s). The seismic methods applied were downhole interval Vs measurements at 15 borehole sites, seismic refraction–reflection profile measurements for 686 sites, high-resolution shear wave reflection “landstreamer” profiling for 25 km in total, and horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) of ambient seismic noise to evaluate the fundamental frequency for ∼400 sites. Most of these methods are able to distinguish the very high shear wave impedance of and depth to bedrock. Sparse earthquake recordings show that the soil amplification is large for weak motion when the soil behaves linearly.


Author(s):  
A. Pancha ◽  
R. A. Apperley

AbstractWe present three case studies from recent site investigations that have utilised geophysical data to supplement traditional geotechnical investigations. The refraction microtremor (ReMi) method, which measures the shear-wave velocity of the subsurface soil profile, is used to enhance our overall understanding of geotechnical site conditions. Interpolation of the closely spaced one-dimensional velocity-depth profiles along linear arrays allows two- or three-dimensional velocity-versus-depth representations to be produced, thereby mapping lateral variations and extending subsurface characterisations between more expensive spot borehole measurements. The ReMi technique provides a non-invasive and cost-effective way of estimating vertical soil/rock shear-wave versus depth profiles and therefore is an effective reconnaissance tool for targeting key areas for further, more expensive intrusive investigation method. This paper examines the contribution ReMi shear-wave velocity assessments can make towards enhancing subsurface geological and geotechnical models to mitigate risk from unforeseen ground conditions. Case studies demonstrate the benefits of incorporating the shear-wave velocity estimates from ReMi into the geotechnical investigations. These include identifying the thickness of basalt flows, identifying the location of buried stream channels, characterising palaeo-topographical features, identifying areas of low velocity which may be prone to liquefaction, and assessing the thickness and velocity variations within geological units between borehole and test pit locations. The objective is not to replace traditional geotechnical investigations but allow more meaningful ground models to be developed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ismail ◽  
F. Brett Denny ◽  
Mohamed Metwaly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document